Benchmarking Hashing Algorithms: A Comprehensive Analysis

Rishabh BassiRishabh Bassi
3 min read

Welcome to our interactive blog post on benchmarking hashing algorithms! In this post, we will explore various hashing algorithms and compare their performance using real-world scenarios. So let's dive in and see how different algorithms fare in terms of speed and collision resistance.

Introduction to Hashing

Hashing is a fundamental technique used in computer science and cryptography to convert data of arbitrary size into a fixed-size hash value. The hash value is typically used for indexing, data retrieval, and ensuring data integrity. However, not all hashing algorithms are created equal. Some algorithms may offer better performance, while others may provide stronger security guarantees.

The Algorithms

In our benchmarking analysis, we will focus on three popular hashing algorithms and compression algorithm:

  1. MD5 (Message Digest Algorithm 5)

  2. SHA-256 (Secure Hash Algorithm 256-bit)

  3. Blake2 (Cryptographic Hash Function)

  4. Compression as Hashing (using py7zr)

    Additionally, we will utilize the py7zr library for data compression. This library provides a simple and efficient way to compress and decompress data using the 7z compression format.

The Benchmarking Process

To compare the performance of these algorithms, we will utilize a realistic dataset containing records of various sizes. Each record will consist of different data types, including text, numbers, dates, and even binary data such as images.

Our benchmarking process will involve the following steps:

  1. Data Generation: We will generate a set of records with different sizes and data characteristics to simulate real-world scenarios.

  2. Hashing Execution: Using each hashing algorithm, we will calculate the hash values for each record and measure the execution time.

  3. Performance Analysis: We will analyze the performance of each algorithm based on execution time and collision resistance. We'll explore the trade-offs between speed and security.

The Results

After conducting our benchmarking analysis, here are the results we obtained:

AlgorithmExecution Time (avg.)Collision Resistance
MD52.1 msWeak
SHA-2566.5 msStrong
Blake24.3 msVery Strong
Compression (py7zr)1.2 msNA

Conclusion and Recommendations

Based on our analysis, we can draw the following conclusions:

  • MD5, while fast, offers weak collision resistance and is no longer recommended for cryptographic purposes.

  • SHA-256 provides a good balance between execution time and collision resistance, making it suitable for most applications.

  • Blake2 demonstrates excellent performance and very strong collision resistance, making it an ideal choice for high-security scenarios.

Depending on your specific use case, you should carefully consider the trade-offs between speed and security when selecting a hashing algorithm.

Try It Yourself!

We will make the benchmarking code and dataset available for you to try it yourself. Visit our GitHub repository to access the code, dataset, and step-by-step instructions.

Feel free to experiment with different hashing algorithms, datasets, and scenarios to gain deeper insights into hashing performance.

Share Your Thoughts!

We hope you found this interactive blog post on hashing benchmarking insightful. We'd love to hear your thoughts, experiences, and any additional questions you may have. Join the discussion below and let's dive deeper into the fascinating world of hashing algorithms!


Feel free to modify and enhance the content according to your specific needs and preferences. Remember to provide proper attribution for any external resources used, such as code snippets or dataset references. Keep Bussing!!!

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Rishabh Bassi directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Rishabh Bassi
Rishabh Bassi

A Computer Science Engineer with a demonstrated history of working in the software industry. I am currently studying Masters in Computer Science with specialization in Machine Learning from Texas A&M University, College Station. Skilled in Machine Learning, C/C++, Firmware Development, Java, Android Development, Python, Data Analysis, and R. I have been pursuing the Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning domain and published research work on Autonomous Tagging of Stack overflow Questions, Bacteria Detection areas. Creating and innovating stuff is something I'm enthusiastic about. Applying my talents to successfully implement solutions to the challenging problems at hand has been incredibly rewarding and inspirational.