Static Analysis Vs Dynamic Analysis in Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Vishal SharmaVishal Sharma
4 min read

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a formidable asset in the engineer's toolbox, revolutionizing how we model and understand complex engineering problems. The two pillars of FEA are static and dynamic analysis, each shedding light on the system's response under varying conditions. Here, we delve into the key characteristics of each, providing concrete examples to clarify the concepts.


Understanding Dynamic Simulation and Explicit-Implicit Integration Methods


Static Analysis

In static analysis, the forces exerted on the system are time-invariant, making them constant for the duration of the analysis. This type of analysis is often applied in situations where loads are steady and slow-changing. For example, when analyzing a bridge, a static load could be the weight of the cars and trucks that it carries daily. These forces induce stress and deformation in the structure. However, since the load remains unchanging, the stress and deformation levels also stay constant.

FEA Consulting services in India | Finite Element Analysis Services India

Simplifying the equation of motion to Stiffness x Deformation = External Force, static analysis overlooks acceleration and velocity as they are always zero. This simplification leads to less computational resource requirements, translating to quicker solution times and minimal memory or disk space usage.

Interestingly, some dynamic problems can be treated as static if certain conditions are met. For instance, a single DOF system vibrating at a frequency that's one-third of its natural frequency can be analyzed using static analysis.

Nevertheless, the inability of static analysis to account for time-varying effects limits its application, especially in scenarios where structures are subjected to both static and dynamic loads.

Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic analysis provides a more comprehensive analysis, accommodating loads that vary with time. This methodology is crucial for systems subjected to forces like impulses, shocks, or even cyclic loads. A typical example is a skyscraper subjected to wind forces, which fluctuate with time. Similarly, a car's suspension system experiences varying forces as it moves on uneven terrain.

FEA 19: Dynamic Analysis - Intro - YouTube

Unlike static analysis, dynamic analysis predicts the system's response (stress, displacement, etc.) at any time point. As the structure has mass and is subjected to dynamic loading, it encounters the inertia effect. This necessitates the application of the full equation of motion: Mass x Acceleration + Damping x Velocity + Stiffness x Deformation = External Force.

However, the added detail comes with a cost. Dynamic analysis tends to be more computationally intensive, leading to longer solution times and greater memory or disk space consumption.

Despite these challenges, dynamic analysis offers a richer understanding of real-world scenarios, making it invaluable in numerous engineering applications.

Wrapping Up

criteria for dynamic analyses infographic

While structures are often studied under static loading, real-world scenarios frequently involve dynamic loading as well. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of both static and dynamic analysis methodologies is imperative to accurately predict a system's behavior under various conditions.

  • In a dynamic analysis, the inertial loads developed by the system due to acceleration are taken into account. Static analyses don’t consider inertia.

  • Mathematically, the difference between static and dynamic analysis is that in a static analysis, only the stiffness matrix of the FEA model is solved.

  • In a dynamic analysis, in addition to the stiffness matrix, the mass matrix (and damping matrix, if not zero) is solved as well. That is one of the reasons why dynamic analyses require more computational time than static analyses, for the same structure.

  • For dynamic analysis, the loads can be in either the time domain or in the frequency domain.

Our team of experts specializes in providing design and FEA solutions for industrial projects, covering all types of nonlinearity. Should you require our expertise, please reach out via sharmavishal929@gmail.com.

Additionally, if you're interested in the day-to-day workings of a professional CAE/FEA Analyst and how they manage client projects independently, stay tuned for more insightful content.

In the vast world of FEA, understanding when to deploy static and dynamic analysis is a key competency. Leveraging these methods effectively can significantly enhance the accuracy and efficiency of your engineering projects.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Vishal Sharma directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Vishal Sharma
Vishal Sharma

I hold a Master's degree in Mechanical Design from BITS Pilani, a prestigious institution renowned for engineering. Over the years, my journey has taken me through various pivotal roles that enriched my technical expertise and broadened my perspective on the industry. I started with New Product Development, delving deep into the intricate nuances of product creation from scratch. As an FEA engineer, I had the privilege to leverage software tools like Ansys and Hypermesh, allowing me to comprehend the depths of Finite Element Analysis and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Beyond these roles, my passion for teaching led me to become an Associate Instructor at Skill Vertex, and since 2018, I've been actively educating a growing audience on YouTube. My proficiency doesn't just lie in theoretical knowledge but extends to practical software skills as well, with hands-on experience in CATIA, SolidWorks, and Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis. One of my notable achievements includes the research and design of differential assembly and driveline components, which was a testament to my dedication and knack for mechanical designing. But at the core of it all, my true desire is to share. I want to bridge the gap between academia and industry by spreading professional knowledge on FEA, 3D modeling software, and tolerance stack-up analysis. I believe in empowering the next generation of engineers with not just knowledge but the wisdom of experience.