Selecting the appropriate load balancer in AWS

Introduction:

Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides multiple options for load balancing solutions, including Elastic Load Balancer (ELB), Application Load Balancer (ALB), and Network Load Balancer (NLB). Each load balancer type serves specific use cases and offers distinct functionalities, catering to diverse application architectures and traffic distribution requirements.

Comparison in Tabular Format:

Criteria	Elastic Load Balancer (ELB)	Application Load Balancer (ALB)	Network Load Balancer (NLB)
Layer of Operation	Transport and Application	Application	Transport
Protocols Supported	HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, SSL	HTTP, HTTPS, WebSockets	TCP, UDP, TLS
Content-Based Routing	No	Yes	No
Path-Based Routing	No	Yes	No
Target Type Supported	EC2 instances, IP addresses, ECS	EC2 instances, IP addresses, ECS	EC2 instances, IP addresses, ECS
SSL/TLS Offloading	Yes	Yes	Yes
Health Checks	Layer 4 and Layer 7	Layer 7	Layer 4 and Layer 7
Use Cases	General load balancing, SSL/TLS offloading, traffic distribution among various target types	Web applications, microservices, content-based routing, container-based applications	High-throughput, low-latency, TCP/UDP-based applications, IoT, gaming, streaming
Scalability	Auto-scaling and dynamic scaling based on traffic	Auto-scaling and dynamic scaling based on traffic	Auto-scaling and dynamic scaling based on traffic
Monitoring and Logging	CloudWatch metrics, Access logs	CloudWatch metrics, Access logs	CloudWatch metrics, Access logs
IP Preservation	No	Yes	Yes
Connection Draining	No	Yes	Yes
Cost Efficiency	Typically cost-effective for basic load balancing requirements	Suitable for complex routing needs, might incur additional costs for advanced features	Ideal for high-throughput, low-latency applications, may have higher costs for smaller-scale deployments
Use Case Recommendations	When simplicity is desired, basic HTTP/HTTPS/TCP load balancing	Web applications, container-based environments, microservices requiring advanced routing and traffic handling	High-throughput, low-latency applications, TCP/UDP-based services, IoT, gaming, streaming platforms

Elastic Load Balancer (ELB):

Overview: ELB is the traditional load balancer from AWS, providing basic load-balancing functionalities across multiple target types.
Use Cases: Suitable for general load balancing needs, SSL/TLS offloading, and distributing traffic among various target types.

Application Load Balancer (ALB):

Overview: ALB operates at the application layer, supporting advanced routing features like path-based and content-based routing.
Use Cases: Ideal for web applications, microservices architectures, content-based routing, and container-based environments.

Network Load Balancer (NLB):

Overview: NLB operates at the transport layer, providing high-throughput, low-latency load balancing for TCP/UDP-based applications.
Use Cases: Best suited for applications requiring high-throughput, low-latency, TCP/UDP-based services, such as IoT, gaming, and streaming platforms.

Conclusion:

Selecting the appropriate load balancer in AWS depends on the specific requirements of your application architecture and traffic distribution needs. ELB serves basic load balancing needs, ALB caters to more advanced routing and application-specific requirements, while NLB excels in handling high-throughput, low-latency applications.

Consider factors like the layer of operation, protocol support, routing capabilities, target types, SSL/TLS offloading, and scalability when choosing between ELB, ALB, and NLB. Evaluating the use case scenarios and understanding the features of each load balancer type is crucial for optimizing application performance and ensuring efficient traffic distribution within AWS environments.

I hope this helps, you!!

More such articles:

https://medium.com/techwasti

https://www.youtube.com/@maheshwarligade

https://techwasti.com/series/spring-boot-tutorials

https://techwasti.com/series/go-language

AWS Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) vs Application Load Balancer (ALB) vs Network Load Balancer (NLB): Detailed Comparison and Use Cases.

Table of contents