ChatGPT Image Analysis Issues: Solving Problems with Prompt and Temperature Adjustments #NLPLog
For the past three days, I have been stuck with the ChatGPT vision task: I asked the model to analyze the content of an image encoded in base64 format using the chat completion API. Despite following the documentation, the API consistently returned the message: “I am unable to analyze the provided image.”
This response led me to believe there was a problem with the image encoding. I spent several hours troubleshooting, convinced that the issue might be related to how the base64 image was formatted or perhaps an error in the API call.
But...
The Discovery: Temperature and Prompt Restrictions
First, I realized that my prompt was overly restrictive. I included a condition instructing the model to avoid analyzing images if it had any additional questions about them instead of trying to clarify the image's content.
Then, I took a closer look at the prompt and API settings. It turned out that I had set the temperature to 0, aiming for a highly deterministic response. However, the low temperature caused the model to repeat the same unhelpful response: "I am unable to analyze the provided image."
This combination of a cautious model and a restrictive prompt effectively boxed the model into a corner, preventing it from performing the task.
The Solution: Adjusting the Prompt and Temperature
After identifying the root causes, I made two key adjustments:
Loosening the Prompt Restrictions: I revised the prompt to be less restrictive, removing the condition that instructed the model to skip the analysis if there were any doubts. Instead, it should seek clarification from the user. This change allowed the model to engage with the image more freely.
Increasing the Temperature to 0.7: I encouraged the model to be more explorative and less conservative in its responses by raising the temperature. This adjustment allowed the model to consider different possibilities rather than defaulting to a repetitive response.
With these adjustments, the API finally analyzed the image as intended.
Key Takeaways
This whole experience highlights how small changes in prompt engineering and API settings can significantly impact the performance of AI models. It also shows how the combination of different parameters can unexpectedly impact LLMs' responses. Therefore:
Be Mindful of Temperature Settings: The temperature setting controls the randomness of the model’s outputs. A lower temperature (close to 0) makes the model more deterministic, often leading to it consistently choosing the most likely response and appearing more conservative. This might result in the model avoiding creative or uncertain tasks. A higher temperature (closer to 1) introduces more variability, allowing the model to generate a broader range of responses, which can help it engage more creatively and effectively.
Avoid Overly Restrictive Prompts: While it's important to guide the model, being too restrictive can prevent it from performing effectively. Allowing some degree of flexibility can lead to better outcomes.
Consider All Variables: When troubleshooting AI issues, consider how various factors—such as prompt structure, temperature, and token length —might influence the model’s behavior, not just technical aspects like image encoding.
It took me three days to realize the unexpected interactions between fine-tuning prompt engineering and API settings. This highlights the need for a balanced approach in guiding AI models—ensuring they have enough flexibility to explore possibilities while maintaining a degree of control.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Wilame Lima directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
Wilame Lima
Wilame Lima
Former journalist, data scientist, and, why not, photographer. Always happy to connect. Drop me a message on one of my social media profiles.