Network engineers often pride themselves on their mastery of real-time tools and command-line interfaces (CLI). The CLI is seen as a badge of honor, a "kewl" toolset that allows engineers to diagnose immediate network issues with surgical precision. While this approach may indeed provide a rapid diagnosis in the heat of the moment, it often falls short when it comes to resolving the underlying problems that cause network instability, poor performance, or recurring issues. The primary reason? A lack of historical trending and deep analysis.

CLIs Are In My Way – Abstract All The Things

The Limitations of Real-Time Tools & the CLI

The CLI, despite its reputation for providing quick answers, is fundamentally a real-time diagnostic tool. It’s designed to help engineers react to live events, such as diagnosing a downed interface or identifying a device that is overburdened with traffic. While this is useful for immediate troubleshooting, it doesn’t lend itself to identifying causation, the underlying root of chronic or recurring issues.

Over-Reliance on the CLI | A "Nerdy" Problem

Many engineers have an over-reliance on the CLI, often viewing it as a technologically advanced, hands-on tool that shows their proficiency in network engineering. However, relying solely on real-time data from the CLI is like trying to diagnose a long-term illness by checking your blood pressure once. You might get a snapshot of the immediate issue, but without the context of historical data, you'll never understand why the problem is recurring.

CLI provides a fragmented view: It can tell you the current status, but it can’t easily tell you how long the problem has existed, whether it’s getting worse, or whether it’s part of a larger, more complex issue that has been slowly developing over time. In other words, the CLI can highlight symptoms but rarely reveals the disease itself.

The Power of Historical Data & Trend Analysis

The real insights come from historical data. By trending performance metrics over time, you can discover patterns, predict future problems, and, most importantly, uncover the root causes of recurring issues. Network anomalies rarely happen in isolation; they are often the culmination of smaller, compounding factors that only become clear through long-term analysis.

Here’s where performance management and advanced traffic statistics tools come into play. These tools gather metrics over time, allowing engineers to visualize how network performance changes, where bottlenecks form, and how traffic patterns shift. With historical data, you can answer the following critical questions:

Has this issue happened before?
Is the problem happening at a specific time or after a specific event?
Is there a trend of increasing errors, latency, or packet loss?
Is the network infrastructure degrading over time?

Without these insights, an engineer can only react to the problem of the moment, leaving the underlying causes to fester until they escalate into more significant failures.

Visual & Graphic Tools | The Domain of Proactive Network Management

Performance management tools provide visual, graphic representations of the network. Instead of seeing a single device’s interface status in real-time (as the CLI does), these tools show traffic flows, error trends, utilization peaks, and latency over days, weeks, or months. This visual context is invaluable when determining root cause because it highlights patterns that the CLI simply cannot show.

For example, a device might experience high CPU usage every day at a certain time, but without historical data, an engineer using CLI would only ever see the device during its low-load period or after it crashes. With visual performance tools, they can correlate this spike with a specific traffic event, policy change, or even external factors like user behavior.

Solving Problems with High Risk & Financial Consequences

The most significant network issues—the ones with the highest risk and financial consequences—are rarely caused by single, isolated events. They are typically the result of long-term degradation: oversubscribed bandwidth, slowly increasing error rates, or devices that are being pushed beyond their capacity. By using visual tools to continuously monitor these metrics, engineers can resolve issues before they escalate, preventing expensive downtime or performance degradation that can disrupt business operations.

The combination of trending data and visual analysis is critical because it allows for predictive problem-solving. Instead of waiting for something to break, engineers can proactively identify the signs of trouble and take action before it impacts the business. This is where CLI falls short. It’s reactive by nature, showing only what is happening at the current moment but offering little help in predicting what’s coming next.

The Transition to Telemetry & Advanced Analytics

Modern networks, especially those employing SD-WAN and other intelligent technologies like Fusion’s platform, have moved beyond the limitations of real-time tools like the CLI. These systems employ telemetry and advanced analytics to provide continuous data collection and trend analysis in real-time, but also with a long-term view. Telemetry streaming gathers data continuously from all points of the network, ensuring that engineers have a full picture of both real-time status and historical performance.

This holistic approach allows for:

Root cause analysis: Historical data reveals patterns and trends that lead to underlying causes of network problems.
Proactive maintenance: Engineers can address performance degradations or impending failures before they impact end-users.
Cost savings: By identifying and fixing problems early, businesses can avoid the financial consequences of outages, performance hits, and unnecessary hardware replacements.

Wrap | CLI Is Not Enough—Proactive Tools Are Essential

The CLI may still be useful for resolving immediate issues, but it is no longer sufficient for addressing the underlying causes of network problems. Engineers who rely solely on real-time tools are doomed to perpetuate a cycle of reactive problem-solving, missing the deeper trends that truly affect network reliability and performance.

By embracing visual and graphic tools for historical trending and performance management, engineers can shift from putting out fires to preventing them in the first place. The future of network troubleshooting isn’t just about seeing what’s happening now—it’s about understanding what has been happening, why it’s happening, and what’s likely to happen next. And for that, only advanced telemetry, analytics, and historical data can provide the complete picture.

Ronald Bartels ensures that Internet inhabiting things are connected reliably online at Fusion Broadband South Africa - the leading specialized SD-WAN provider in South Africa. Learn more about the best SD-WAN in the world: 👉Contact Fusion🚀

https://hubandspoke.amastelek.com/cappuccino-a-day

👴Why Network Engineers Who Rely Only on Real-Time Tools Fail to Resolve Underlying Problems ⛐