EBS vs EFS vs Instance Store
Gedion Daniel
2 min read
When choosing between EBS, EFS, and Instance Store in AWS, it's essential to understand how each type of storage is unique. Here’s a quick comparison to help you decide:
Feature | EBS (Elastic Block Store) | EFS (Elastic File System) | Instance Store |
Type of Storage | Block-level | File-level | Local disk (attached directly) |
Data Persistence | Yes (Data is persistent even if instance is stopped) | Yes (Data persists with automatic replication) | No (Data is lost if instance stops or is terminated) |
Shared Access | No (Only one instance can access at a time) | Yes (Multiple instances can access the same data) | No (Only available to the instance it's attached to) |
Ideal Use Case | Databases, applications needing fast I/O | Shared files for web servers, analytics, shared storage | Temporary data like cache, buffers, and logs |
Scalability | Fixed size (requires resizing to scale) | Automatic scaling based on usage | Fixed size (defined by instance type) |
Backup Options | Snapshots for backup and recovery | Automatic backups and data replication | None (data is temporary) |
Performance | High IOPS, low latency for database tasks | Scalable, but not as high-speed as EBS | High speed for temporary use cases |
Summary
EBS is best for applications that need reliable, block-level storage with persistent data, such as databases.
EFS is ideal if you need a shared file system accessible by multiple instances, perfect for shared data storage across instances.
Instance Store offers temporary, high-speed storage directly connected to the instance, best for data that doesn’t need to persist after the instance stops.
0
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Gedion Daniel directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
ebsEFSAWSAWS Certified Solutions Architect Associateaws-cdkaws lambdaAWS Amplifyec2EC2 instanceec2 instance typesEFS Securityinstancestorage
Written by
Gedion Daniel
Gedion Daniel
I am a Software Developer from Italy.