Building a Complete NFT Launchpad: Part 1 - Smart Contracts
Hey NFT enthusiasts! ๐ Ever wondered how platforms like OpenSea and Rarible allow creators to launch their NFT collections without spending a fortune on gas? In this first part of our NFT Launchpad series, we'll dive deep into creating a gas-optimized smart contract foundation for your platform.
What is an NFT Launchpad? ๐
Think of an NFT Launchpad as a factory that creates and manages NFT collections. Instead of creators having to deploy their own smart contracts (which can be risky and expensive), they use your platform to launch their collections securely and cost-effectively.
Here's the architecture we'll build:
graph TD
A[Launchpad Factory Contract] -->|Clones| B[Implementation Contract]
B -->|Minimal Proxy| C[Collection 1]
B -->|Minimal Proxy| D[Collection 2]
B -->|Minimal Proxy| E[Collection 3]
C -->|Mints| F[NFTs]
D -->|Mints| G[NFTs]
E -->|Mints| H[NFTs]
style B fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:4px
Understanding the Imports ๐
Before we dive into the code, let's understand the key OpenZeppelin contracts we'll be using:
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/proxy/Clones.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/ERC721.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol";
Let's break down why we need each import:
Ownable.sol
Provides basic access control
Enables owner-only functions like fee withdrawal
Includes safe ownership transfer mechanisms
ReentrancyGuard.sol
Prevents reentrancy attacks
Essential for functions handling ETH transfers
Uses a simple mutex pattern
Clones.sol
Implements EIP-1167 minimal proxy pattern
Reduces deployment costs by ~95%
Enables cheap collection creation
ERC721.sol
Base implementation for NFT standard
Includes core NFT functions
Handles ownership and transfers
Counters.sol
Safe counter for token IDs
Prevents overflow errors
Simple increment/decrement operations
The Factory Contract ๐ญ
Let's implement our gas-optimized Factory Contract:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/proxy/Clones.sol";
contract NFTLaunchpadFactory is Ownable, ReentrancyGuard {
using Clones for address;
// Implementation contract address that will be cloned
address public immutable implementationContract;
// Fee structure
uint256 public creationFee = 0.1 ether;
uint256 public platformFeePercentage = 5; // 5% of mint price
// Collection tracking
struct Collection {
address contractAddress;
address creator;
uint256 mintPrice;
uint256 maxSupply;
bool isActive;
}
mapping(address => Collection) public collections;
address[] public allCollections;
event CollectionCreated(
address indexed collectionAddress,
address indexed creator,
uint256 mintPrice,
uint256 maxSupply
);
constructor() {
// Deploy the implementation contract once
implementationContract = address(new NFTCollection());
}
// Create new collection using minimal proxy clone
function createCollection(
string memory name,
string memory symbol,
uint256 mintPrice,
uint256 maxSupply
) external payable nonReentrant {
require(msg.value >= creationFee, "Insufficient creation fee");
// Clone the implementation contract
address clone = implementationContract.clone();
// Initialize the clone
NFTCollection(clone).initialize(
name,
symbol,
mintPrice,
maxSupply,
msg.sender,
address(this)
);
// Store collection details
collections[clone] = Collection({
contractAddress: clone,
creator: msg.sender,
mintPrice: mintPrice,
maxSupply: maxSupply,
isActive: true
});
allCollections.push(clone);
emit CollectionCreated(
clone,
msg.sender,
mintPrice,
maxSupply
);
}
// Withdraw platform fees
function withdrawFees() external onlyOwner {
payable(owner()).transfer(address(this).balance);
}
}
The NFT Collection Contract Template ๐จ
Here's our optimized NFT Collection contract that will be cloned:
contract NFTCollection is ERC721, ReentrancyGuard {
using Counters for Counters.Counter;
Counters.Counter private _tokenIds;
uint256 public mintPrice;
uint256 public maxSupply;
address public creator;
address public launchpad;
string public baseURI;
bool private initialized;
// Remove constructor and add initializer
function initialize(
string memory name,
string memory symbol,
uint256 _mintPrice,
uint256 _maxSupply,
address _creator,
address _launchpad
) external {
require(!initialized, "Already initialized");
initialized = true;
// Initialize ERC721
_initialize(name, symbol);
mintPrice = _mintPrice;
maxSupply = _maxSupply;
creator = _creator;
launchpad = _launchpad;
}
function mint() external payable nonReentrant {
require(initialized, "Not initialized");
require(msg.value >= mintPrice, "Insufficient payment");
require(_tokenIds.current() < maxSupply, "Max supply reached");
uint256 platformFee = (msg.value * 5) / 100; // 5% platform fee
uint256 creatorPayment = msg.value - platformFee;
// Send platform fee to launchpad
payable(launchpad).transfer(platformFee);
// Send remaining amount to creator
payable(creator).transfer(creatorPayment);
_tokenIds.increment();
_safeMint(msg.sender, _tokenIds.current());
}
function setBaseURI(string memory _newBaseURI) external {
require(msg.sender == creator, "Only creator can set URI");
baseURI = _newBaseURI;
}
function _baseURI() internal view override returns (string memory) {
return baseURI;
}
}
Gas Optimization Deep Dive โฝ
Our implementation uses several gas optimization techniques:
Minimal Proxy Pattern (EIP-1167)
Traditional deployment: ~2M gas
Clone deployment: ~45k gas
Savings: ~97% gas reduction
Immutable Variables
implementationContract
marked as immutableSaves gas by avoiding storage reads
Efficient Storage Layout
Grouped similar-sized variables
Uses packing where possible
Minimizes storage slots
Let's verify these savings with a test:
const { expect } = require("chai");
describe("NFT Launchpad Gas Comparison", function () {
let factory;
let creator;
beforeEach(async function () {
[owner, creator] = await ethers.getSigners();
const Factory = await ethers.getContractFactory("NFTLaunchpadFactory");
factory = await Factory.deploy();
await factory.deployed();
});
it("Should show gas savings with clones", async function () {
const creationFee = ethers.utils.parseEther("0.1");
// Create first collection
const tx1 = await factory.connect(creator).createCollection(
"Test Collection 1",
"TEST1",
ethers.utils.parseEther("0.1"),
100,
{ value: creationFee }
);
const receipt1 = await tx1.wait();
// Create second collection
const tx2 = await factory.connect(creator).createCollection(
"Test Collection 2",
"TEST2",
ethers.utils.parseEther("0.1"),
100,
{ value: creationFee }
);
const receipt2 = await tx2.wait();
// Second deployment should use significantly less gas
expect(receipt2.gasUsed).to.be.lt(receipt1.gasUsed.div(10));
});
});
Revenue Streams for the Launchpad ๐ฐ
Creation Fees: 0.1 ETH per collection
Platform Fees: 5% of each mint
Future Features:
Premium listing spots
Marketing services
Custom features
Security Features ๐ก๏ธ
Our implementation includes several security measures:
Initialization Guard
Prevents double initialization
Secures proxy pattern
Access Control
Owner-only fee withdrawal
Creator-only URI updates
Reentrancy Protection
Guards all external calls
Secures ETH transfers
Event Emissions
Tracks all important actions
Enables off-chain indexing
What's Next? ๐ฏ
In Part 2, we'll cover:
Building the React frontend
Web3 integration
Collection management
Minting interface
Conclusion ๐
We've built a gas-efficient NFT launchpad that saves creators significant deployment costs while maintaining security and functionality. The minimal proxy pattern makes our platform competitive by reducing entry barriers for creators.
Remember to:
Test thoroughly
Consider a security audit
Monitor gas costs
Keep implementation contract immutable
Stay tuned for Part 2, where we'll build the frontend! Drop your questions below.
This is Part 1 of the "Building a Complete NFT Launchpad" series. Follow me to get notified when Part 2 is published!
#NFT #Web3 #Blockchain #Solidity #Programming
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Diluk Angelo directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
Diluk Angelo
Diluk Angelo
Hey there! I'm Diluk Angelo, a Tech Lead and Web3 developer passionate about bridging the gap between traditional web solutions and the decentralized future. With years of leadership experience under my belt, I've guided teams and mentored developers in their technical journey. What really drives me is the art of transformation โ taking proven Web2 solutions and reimagining them for the Web3 ecosystem while ensuring they remain scalable and efficient. Through this blog, I share practical insights from my experience in architecting decentralized solutions, leading technical teams, and navigating the exciting challenges of Web3 development. Whether you're a seasoned developer looking to pivot to Web3 or a curious mind exploring the possibilities of decentralized technology, you'll find actionable knowledge and real-world perspectives here. Expect deep dives into Web3 architecture, scalability solutions, team leadership in blockchain projects, and practical guides on transitioning from Web2 to Web3. I believe in making complex concepts accessible and sharing lessons learned from the trenches. Join me as we explore the future of the web, one block at a time!