Best Electron Alternatives for Desktop Development
Kist
If Electron feels too heavy or problematic, alternatives like NW.js, Neutralino.js, Tauri, or even a lightweight Python or C# solution might suit your needs. Here’s a breakdown of these options:
NW.js
Advantages: Similar to Electron but with a lighter setup and better integration with native OS APIs. NW.js can directly use Node.js modules without extra configuration.
Performance: Faster startup than Electron, though still Chromium-based, so memory usage is comparable.
Ease of Use: Similar to Electron in terms of JavaScript/Node familiarity, with fewer complexities. NW.js might work well if you’re comfortable with web technologies but want less configuration hassle than Electron.
Neutralino.js
Advantages: Much lighter than Electron and NW.js, since it doesn’t bundle Chromium. It uses the system’s webview (WebView2 on Windows, WebKit on macOS, WebKitGTK on Linux).
Performance: Low memory and disk footprint, and often much faster to load since it avoids bundling Chromium. Startup and runtime performance are typically better than Electron or NW.js.
Ease of Use: Easier than Electron if you’re comfortable with JavaScript/HTML/CSS, and it requires less boilerplate. However, its capabilities are more limited (no advanced Node.js features).
Tauri
Advantages: Designed for small and fast desktop applications, Tauri uses the system’s native webview (like Neutralino) and Rust for the backend, which leads to low memory and CPU usage.
Performance: Often the best performance in terms of resource efficiency and startup time.
Ease of Use: Tauri has a steeper learning curve if you’re not familiar with Rust, though it’s lightweight and secure. Good documentation makes it manageable for JavaScript developers who want a minimalistic desktop app framework.
Python with PyQt or PySide
Advantages: Python is beginner-friendly and has mature libraries like PyQt or PySide for creating GUI applications.
Performance: Generally faster startup and lighter on resources than Electron, but possibly slower than Tauri or Neutralino due to Python’s overhead.
Ease of Use: Easy if you’re familiar with Python. PyQt and PySide have extensive documentation, though UI building may feel less streamlined than web technologies.
C# with WinForms or WPF (Windows Only)
Advantages: Native to Windows, integrates well with Windows OS features, and provides good performance for desktop applications.
Performance: Fast, as it’s compiled and optimized for Windows.
Ease of Use: If you’re comfortable with C#, developing a Windows-specific app is straightforward with Visual Studio. WinForms is simple but less modern; WPF offers more control over UI but has a steeper learning curve.
Conclusion
A Neutralino.js or Tauri app may be ideal. Both have low resource usage and fast startup.
Neutralino.js: Easy and simple to set up, very lightweight and easy to maintain. Great for simple GUIs with minimal configuration.
Tauri: Offers the best performance and control if you’re open to learning a bit of Rust.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Kist directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by