AI Business Model #3: Token-Based Models
Anix Lynch1. Business Model Overview
Description: Token-based models leverage blockchain technology to provide AI services through tokenized ecosystems. Users purchase or earn tokens to access services, contribute to the network, or incentivize participation in decentralized AI marketplaces.
Companies: SingularityNET, Ocean Protocol, Fetch.AI.
2. Key Metrics and Benchmarks
| Metric | Definition | Target Value (Benchmark) | Comments |
| Token Circulation | Total tokens actively used in transactions. | >70% of total supply | High circulation reflects active usage and demand. |
| Transaction Volume | Total value of transactions on the platform (monthly). | $10M–$50M+ | High volume indicates strong platform activity and token utility. |
| Token Price Volatility | Measure of token price fluctuations over time. | <20% monthly | Lower volatility increases token trustworthiness for business use. |
| Platform Adoption Rate | Growth in active users or developers using the platform. | >20% annual | Indicates the success of onboarding strategies and utility demand. |
| Revenue from Transactions | Platform revenue from transaction fees or token sales. | 1%–5% of transaction value | Reflects the ability to monetize network activity. |
3. Unit Economics
Sample Inputs:
Token price: $5
Monthly active transactions: 100,000
Average transaction size: $100
Platform fee: 2%
Development cost: $1M/year
Retention rate: 80%
Sample Outputs:
Monthly Revenue:
Formula:
Transactions × Average Transaction Size × Platform FeeCalculation:
100,000 × $100 × 2% = $200,000
Annual Revenue:
Formula:
Monthly Revenue × 12Calculation:
$200,000 × 12 = $2,400,000
Gross Profit:
Formula:
Revenue - Development CostCalculation:
$2,400,000 - $1,000,000 = $1,400,000
Gross Margin:
Formula:
(Gross Profit ÷ Revenue) × 100Calculation:
($1,400,000 ÷ $2,400,000) × 100 = 58.33%
Token Demand:
Formula:
Transactions × Token PriceCalculation:
100,000 × $5 = $500,000
Payback Period:
Formula:
Development Cost ÷ Annual RevenueCalculation:
$1,000,000 ÷ $2,400,000 = 0.42 years (~5 months)
4. Sample Business Projection (Annualized)
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
| Token Price ($) | 5 | 5.50 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 7.00 |
| Monthly Transactions (K) | 100 | 150 | 225 | 300 | 400 |
| Average Transaction Size ($) | 100 | 110 | 120 | 130 | 140 |
| Annual Revenue ($M) | 2.40 | 4.95 | 8.10 | 12.87 | 20.16 |
| Development Costs ($M) | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.50 | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Gross Profit ($M) | 1.40 | 3.75 | 6.60 | 11.07 | 18.16 |
| Gross Margin (%) | 58.33 | 75.76 | 81.48 | 86.02 | 90.10 |
| Retention Rate (%) | 80 | 82 | 85 | 87 | 90 |
| Payback Period (Months) | 5 | 2.91 | 2.22 | 1.68 | 1.19 |
5. Key Insights from the Model
Strengths:
Decentralized Scalability: Tokenized models scale with network effects and community participation.
Recurring Revenue: Transaction fees create a steady revenue stream proportional to platform usage.
Low Marginal Costs: Once developed, decentralized platforms require minimal ongoing costs.
Challenges:
Volatility Risks: Token price volatility can discourage enterprise adoption.
Regulatory Compliance: Navigating global regulations on blockchain and AI can be complex.
Opportunities:
Enterprise Integration: Providing stablecoins or hedging mechanisms for enterprises can drive adoption.
Network Growth Incentives: Rewarding developers or users for participation increases utility and demand.
6. Evaluation Criteria Table
| Criterion | Weight (%) | Score (1-5) | Weighted Score | Evaluation | Checklist Questions |
| Market Opportunity | 20% | 5 | 1.00 | Token-based models address a growing intersection of AI and blockchain markets. | - Is the total addressable market large and growing? - Are industries underserved by tokenized AI platforms? |
| Scalability | 15% | 4 | 0.60 | Tokenized ecosystems scale well with network growth but require strong node incentives. | - Can the ecosystem support rapid transaction growth? - Are tokens incentivizing network participation? |
| Revenue Potential | 20% | 4 | 0.80 | Strong revenue potential through transaction fees and token appreciation, though token volatility poses challenges. | - Does token demand align with platform usage? - Is there a mechanism to stabilize token prices? |
| Differentiation | 15% | 4 | 0.60 | Unique decentralized architectures and proprietary AI tools differentiate tokenized models. | - Does the platform combine AI and decentralized technology uniquely? - Are services proprietary? |
| Adoption Barriers | 10% | 3 | 0.30 | Adoption barriers include the need for blockchain expertise and regulatory compliance. | - How easy is onboarding for users? - Are regulatory risks manageable? |
| Customer Stickiness | 10% | 5 | 0.50 | High stickiness due to token integration and workflow dependency. | - How dependent are users on tokens for services? - Are token rewards driving continued usage? |
| Competitive Landscape | 10% | 4 | 0.40 | Competition exists from centralized alternatives, but decentralized platforms offer unique advantages. | - How many competitors target the same niche? - Does the platform have network effects? |
| Ethical Considerations | 10% | 5 | 0.50 | Tokenized models enhance transparency and traceability but require safeguards against misuse. | - Are safeguards against token speculation in place? - Does the platform address ethical AI concerns? |
Total Weighted Score: 4.40 / 5
7. Pricing Variants Table
| Pricing Model | Description | Examples | Sample Numbers (Pricing) |
| Pay-Per-Transaction | Users pay a small fee for each transaction or service usage. | Fetch.AI, SingularityNET | 1%–5% of transaction value. |
| Subscription + Token Access | Subscription for base services plus token use for advanced features or services. | SingularityNET, Ocean Protocol | $100–$1,000/year subscription. |
| Freemium + Token Upsells | Free base access with tokens required for premium features or usage. | Fetch.AI, Ocean Protocol | Free; tokens priced at $5–$10 each. |
| Staking Rewards | Users stake tokens for discounts, access, or ecosystem rewards. | Fetch.AI, SingularityNET | 5%–15% annual staking rewards. |
8. Key Insights from Pricing Models
Transaction-Based Revenue Scales: Directly proportional to platform usage, transaction fees drive predictable growth.
Token Price Sensitivity: Stability in token pricing is crucial for enterprise adoption.
Incentivized Growth: Staking rewards and token-based participation increase user engagement and ecosystem health.
8. Monetization Trends
Tokenized AI Ecosystems: Platforms like Ocean Protocol and Fetch.AI use token models exclusively.
Incentivized Growth through Staking: This is a variant of the Token-Based Model for ecosystem participation.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Anix Lynch directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by