TCP vs. UDP: Making the Right Choice for Applications
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d0a5/5d0a5f8bc8a17c5592788d94295a4849e44b98bd" alt="Ribal Raza"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87c39/87c392dc60e221efe88155badd987311d1d3ede5" alt=""
Imagine you’re in the middle of an intense online game, lining up the perfect shot, when suddenly everything lags. Meanwhile, your friend in the next room has been downloading a huge file for hours without a single hiccup. Why the discrepancy? It often comes down to the underlying transport protocol—TCP or UDP—and the decisions these protocols make about reliability and speed.
In simpler terms,
TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is like the punctual courier who confirms every delivery and won’t leave until the recipient signs. If something’s lost along the way, it goes back and tries again, ensuring each package arrives exactly how it was sent.
UDP (User Datagram Protocol), on the other hand, is more like a quick messenger service that tosses your data packets out the door as soon as possible, trusting they’ll reach their destination. No signature, no confirmations, no waiting around.
Both protocols are described in official documents called RFCs (Request for Comments). For instance, RFC 793 says TCP is a reliable, ordered stream protocol—which, in plain English, means it uses acknowledgments and sequence numbers to guarantee data arrives intact and in the correct sequence. On the flip side, RFC 768 defines UDP as a minimal, connectionless protocol, sending data without guarantees of arrival or order.
Why do we even bother with UDP when we can get bulletproof reliability from TCP? Sometimes, raw speed and low latency matter more than perfect accuracy. In live video calls, streaming, or fast-paced gaming, a missing packet or two might cause a momentary glitch, but that’s better than buffering every few seconds. In other words, reliability is great for, say, your bank transactions, but speed is critical when your entire team’s victory depends on that split-second reaction.
How TCP Works?
TCP starts with a “3-Way Handshake”: your device sends a SYN packet, the server responds with SYN+ACK, and your device replies with ACK. After these quick handshakes, both sides know they’re ready to talk. As data flows, TCP numbers each byte and expects acknowledgments in return. If those acknowledgments don’t arrive, TCP automatically retransmits the missing data. This means everything arrives in perfect order—or it keeps trying until it does.
This reliability comes at a cost. TCP’s handshake introduces a slight delay before sending data, and the extra checks (including congestion control) add overhead to each connection. If there’s even a small packet loss on a high-latency network, the throughput can take a big hit, because TCP reacts by slowing down and retrying.
How UDP Works?
UDP is the “send first, ask questions never” protocol. The moment your application hands it data, UDP just forwards that data (known as a datagram) without checking if the receiver is listening, or if it got there at all. It’s a stripped-down approach that reduces overhead and latency—perfect for real-time streaming, VoIP calls, and online gaming.
However, if your network is flaky, UDP won’t magically fix dropped packets. It also doesn’t reorder anything that arrives out of place. If your app truly needs reliability on top of UDP, you have to build that logic yourself (like some streaming apps do with custom buffering or error correction).
Zoom, Netflix, and Fortnite: Three Giants, Three Different Views
Zoom often prefers UDP for live video conferences, because that fraction-of-a-second advantage can mean the difference between a smooth meeting and awkward silences. But what if you’re on a strict corporate network that blocks UDP? Zoom will cleverly switch to TCP over port 443 (the same port used for HTTPS) so the call can still go on—just with a little extra overhead.
Netflix takes almost the opposite approach. Since it’s streaming large video files and can buffer ahead, reliability is key to ensuring your movie or series never has major corruption. It invests heavily in TCP, advanced congestion control, and its own content delivery network called Open Connect. Sure, you might wait a second or two before the video starts, but once it’s rolling, you’ll see crisp quality with fewer interruptions.
Fortnite straddles both worlds. It needs lightning-fast actions and position updates—“shoot first, never lag behind!”—so UDP is critical for real-time gameplay. But Fortnite also relies on certain TCP-based connections for things like authentication, purchases, or text chat, because you really don’t want your V-Bucks purchase to vanish into the nether.
Performance: Why Protocol Choice Matters
Studies have shown that even a 1% packet loss can drastically reduce TCP throughput on long-distance or high-latency links, because TCP slows down to avoid congesting the network. Tools like iPerf can measure how your bandwidth holds up under TCP vs. UDP. On the other hand, if you’re streaming real-time video with UDP, you might not even notice a 1% loss except for a minor blip in video quality—no big buffer animation popping up.
So, Which One Should You Use?
A simple mental flowchart helps:
If it’s absolutely critical to get every piece of data without error—like transferring money, receiving medical data, or sending important logs—TCP is usually safer.
If you care more about fast updates, minimal latency, and can handle small losses—like gaming, live video chat, or real-time sensor data—UDP might be your best friend.
If you need something in between, modern technologies like QUIC (used by HTTP/3) run on UDP but add built-in reliability, congestion control, and encryption. You could say QUIC is the “future” blend of speed and reliability.
A Quick Peek at the Future
More and more services are shifting to HTTP/3 and QUIC, which bypass some of TCP’s legacy limitations while still providing robust encryption and multi-stream capabilities. Meanwhile, research in data centers focuses on how to push TCP to new performance heights (like the “PowerTCP” approach). So, it’s not just about picking TCP or UDP anymore—it’s about choosing the best tool (or hybrid approach) for the job at hand.
Wrapping It All Up
In the end, there’s no universal “right” answer—just the right choice for your context. Do you want absolute certainty that every packet arrives come what may? Or do you want blazing speed with the occasional dropped data? Real-world applications like Zoom, Netflix, and Fortnite show that a hybrid or flexible approach is often ideal: rely on UDP when every millisecond counts, and let TCP’s reliability shine when data integrity is paramount.
Pick the protocol that aligns with your project’s needs, keep an eye on your network conditions, and always test in the environment you expect your users to be in. That way, whether you’re blasting aliens in an online arena or binging the latest show, your data arrives exactly when—or how—you need it to.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Ribal Raza directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d0a5/5d0a5f8bc8a17c5592788d94295a4849e44b98bd" alt="Ribal Raza"