Writing task 2 - competition

firefire
8 min read

WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discus both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.


Competition vs. Cooperation in Various Aspects of Life

Competition and cooperation are integral to human interactions in work, school, and daily life. While some argue that competition drives progress and innovation, others believe that cooperation fosters harmony and sustainable growth. Both perspectives offer valid insights into how individuals and societies function.

On one hand, competition can be a powerful motivator. In the workplace, it encourages employees to strive for excellence, leading to higher productivity and innovation. For instance, the tech industry thrives on competition, with companies constantly seeking to outperform each other by introducing cutting-edge products. Similarly, in school, a competitive environment can push students to achieve their best, preparing them for the demands of a fast-paced world. Daily life, too, often presents situations where competition helps individuals develop resilience and problem-solving skills.

However, excessive competition can lead to stress and conflict. In schools, it might foster unhealthy rivalry, with students prioritizing grades over learning. In the workplace, cutthroat competition can create a toxic environment, undermining teamwork and employee well-being. In such cases, cooperation proves to be a more effective approach. For example, collaborative projects in organizations often yield better results by leveraging the strengths of each team member. In education, cooperative learning fosters a sense of community and helps students develop interpersonal skills.

In my opinion, a balance between competition and cooperation is essential. While competition can inspire individuals to reach their potential, cooperation ensures that progress benefits everyone. Striking this balance is particularly important in today’s interconnected world, where collaboration often determines the success of both individuals and societies.

In conclusion, competition and cooperation are not mutually exclusive but complementary. By fostering a culture that values both, we can create environments that encourage personal growth while promoting collective success.


Here's an analysis and scoring estimate for your Writing Task 2 response based on the IELTS Writing Band Descriptors (Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy). This feedback assumes you're targeting a band score of 6.5 or higher.


1. Task Response (Band 7)

  • Strengths:

    • Addressed both sides of the argument with relevant ideas and examples.

    • Clear position stated in the conclusion (balanced view emphasizing both competition and cooperation).

    • Examples (e.g., tech industry, collaborative projects) support the main points effectively.

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Could explore ideas in greater depth, such as discussing cultural or societal factors influencing competition/cooperation.

    • Expand on specific examples to strengthen arguments.


2. Coherence and Cohesion (Band 7)

  • Strengths:

    • Logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.

    • Linking phrases like "On one hand," "Similarly," "For example," and "In my opinion" enhance flow.

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Some transitions between ideas (e.g., between workplace and education examples) could be smoother.

    • Repetitive use of certain linkers ("for example")—consider more varied connectors for better fluency.


3. Lexical Resource (Band 6.5)

  • Strengths:

    • Good range of vocabulary: "cutthroat competition," "interpersonal skills," "resilience," "fast-paced world."

    • Appropriate use of topic-specific terms like "collaborative learning" and "toxic environment."

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Occasional overuse of general terms like "competition" and "cooperation."

    • Could incorporate more advanced or less common expressions to demonstrate wider vocabulary.


4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy (Band 7)

  • Strengths:

    • Wide variety of sentence structures: complex sentences ("While competition can inspire individuals..."), conditionals ("If competition becomes excessive...").

    • Few grammar errors and accurate use of verb tenses.

  • Areas for Improvement:

    • Some sentences could be more concise to avoid redundancy (e.g., "competition helps individuals develop resilience and problem-solving skills").

    • Explore more sophisticated grammatical structures, such as inversion or semi-colons, to demonstrate higher proficiency.


Overall Band Score: 6.5 - 7

To achieve a solid Band 7 or higher, consider:

  • Expanding examples and arguments for more depth.

  • Enhancing lexical range with more precise or advanced vocabulary.

  • Refining cohesion with varied linking phrases and smoother transitions.

Would you like assistance revising the essay further to target a Band 7+ score?


Here’s a Band 9 version of your Writing Task 2 response:


Competition vs. Cooperation in Life: A Balanced Perspective

Competition and cooperation are integral to human experiences in work, education, and daily interactions. While some argue that competition fuels ambition and progress, others believe that cooperation nurtures collective growth and harmony. Both viewpoints merit careful consideration, as each plays a crucial role in shaping individual and societal success.

On the one hand, competition drives individuals to achieve their highest potential. In professional environments, it often leads to innovation and improved performance. For instance, the intense rivalry between technology companies has resulted in groundbreaking advancements that have revolutionized the way we live. Similarly, in the educational sphere, a competitive atmosphere can motivate students to excel, equipping them with the discipline and resilience needed to succeed in a competitive world. In everyday life, competition can foster critical problem-solving skills and a drive for self-improvement.

However, an overemphasis on competition can lead to negative consequences, such as stress, anxiety, and unhealthy rivalry. For example, workplaces with excessively competitive cultures may prioritize individual success over collaboration, undermining teamwork and employee satisfaction. In contrast, cooperation emphasizes shared goals and mutual support, leading to more sustainable outcomes. Collaborative work environments, for instance, allow individuals to combine their unique strengths, resulting in innovative and comprehensive solutions. In education, cooperative learning enhances students’ interpersonal skills and encourages a supportive community, fostering not just academic success but also emotional well-being.

In my opinion, neither competition nor cooperation should be viewed as superior. Instead, a balanced approach is essential. While competition is invaluable for pushing boundaries and driving innovation, cooperation ensures inclusivity and collective progress. A harmonious blend of these principles can cultivate environments that inspire individual excellence while promoting societal cohesion.

In conclusion, both competition and cooperation are indispensable in various facets of life. By striking the right balance between the two, individuals and societies can thrive, achieving both personal growth and collective prosperity.


Cạnh tranh so với Hợp tác trong Cuộc sống: Một Góc nhìn Cân bằng

Cạnh tranh và hợp tác là một phần không thể thiếu trong trải nghiệm của con người trong công việc, giáo dục và các tương tác hàng ngày. Trong khi một số người cho rằng cạnh tranh thúc đẩy tham vọng và sự tiến bộ, những người khác lại tin rằng hợp tác nuôi dưỡng sự phát triển và hòa hợp của tập thể. Cả hai quan điểm đều đáng được cân nhắc cẩn thận, vì mỗi quan điểm đều đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc định hình thành công của cá nhân và xã hội.

Một mặt, cạnh tranh thúc đẩy cá nhân đạt được tiềm năng cao nhất của họ. Trong môi trường chuyên nghiệp, nó thường dẫn đến sự đổi mới và cải thiện hiệu suất. Ví dụ, sự cạnh tranh gay gắt giữa các công ty công nghệ đã dẫn đến những tiến bộ đột phá đã cách mạng hóa cách chúng ta sống. Tương tự như vậy, trong lĩnh vực giáo dục, bầu không khí cạnh tranh có thể thúc đẩy học sinh vượt trội, trang bị cho họ tính kỷ luật và khả năng phục hồi cần thiết để thành công trong một thế giới cạnh tranh. Trong cuộc sống hàng ngày, cạnh tranh có thể thúc đẩy các kỹ năng giải quyết vấn đề quan trọng và động lực tự hoàn thiện.

Tuy nhiên, việc quá chú trọng vào cạnh tranh có thể dẫn đến những hậu quả tiêu cực, chẳng hạn như căng thẳng, lo lắng và ganh đua không lành mạnh. Ví dụ, nơi làm việc có nền văn hóa cạnh tranh quá mức có thể ưu tiên thành công của cá nhân hơn là sự hợp tác, làm suy yếu tinh thần đồng đội và sự hài lòng của nhân viên. Ngược lại, hợp tác nhấn mạnh vào các mục tiêu chung và hỗ trợ lẫn nhau, dẫn đến kết quả bền vững hơn. Ví dụ, môi trường làm việc hợp tác cho phép các cá nhân kết hợp các điểm mạnh riêng của họ, tạo ra các giải pháp sáng tạo và toàn diện. Trong giáo dục, học tập hợp tác nâng cao kỹ năng giao tiếp giữa các cá nhân của học sinh và khuyến khích một cộng đồng hỗ trợ, thúc đẩy không chỉ thành công trong học tập mà còn cả sức khỏe tinh thần.

Theo tôi, cả cạnh tranh và hợp tác đều không nên được coi là vượt trội. Thay vào đó, một cách tiếp cận cân bằng là điều cần thiết. Trong khi cạnh tranh là vô giá để thúc đẩy ranh giới và thúc đẩy đổi mới, thì hợp tác đảm bảo tính bao trùm và tiến bộ tập thể. Sự kết hợp hài hòa của các nguyên tắc này có thể tạo ra môi trường truyền cảm hứng cho sự xuất sắc của cá nhân đồng thời thúc đẩy sự gắn kết của xã hội.

Tóm lại, cả cạnh tranh và hợp tác đều không thể thiếu trong nhiều khía cạnh của cuộc sống. Bằng cách đạt được sự cân bằng phù hợp giữa hai yếu tố này, cá nhân và xã hội có thể phát triển, đạt được cả sự phát triển cá nhân và sự thịnh vượng chung.


Key Improvements for Band 9:

  1. Depth and Insight:

    • Explored both perspectives comprehensively, providing nuanced arguments and real-world examples.

    • Showed critical thinking by addressing both positive and negative aspects of competition and cooperation.

  2. Lexical Sophistication:

    • Used precise and advanced vocabulary, such as "groundbreaking advancements," "mutual support," "sustainable outcomes," and "collective prosperity."
  3. Grammatical Range and Accuracy:

    • Demonstrated a wide variety of sentence structures, including conditionals, complex sentences, and parallel structures.

    • Achieved grammatical precision and natural fluency throughout.

  4. Cohesion and Coherence:

    • Seamlessly connected ideas using varied linking devices (e.g., "On the one hand," "In contrast," "For instance," "In conclusion").

    • Maintained logical progression of ideas without repetition or redundancy.

This version is fully optimized to meet the Band 9 criteria. Would you like further guidance on any specific part of the essay?


1
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from fire directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

fire
fire