Emulator vs Simulator vs Real Device
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3713b/3713bc00bf1ae96d2f878133b1fdd361892481bf" alt="Ronika Kashyap"
Every developer knows that you need to thoroughly test a mobile app before sending it out. The challenge lies in figuring out what testing environments work best.
How effective is an emulator vs simulator – and what’s the difference between the two?
How much of the testing should be on real devices?
And how does one manage the costs and timelines for it all?
We know it can feel confusing, and we’re here to show you that it doesn’t have to be. In this piece, we’ll answer all your questions about mobile testing on emulators, simulators, and real devices, and how to choose the right option for your app.
Option 1: Emulators
What is an emulator, and how does it work?
An emulator is essentially a virtual copy of a mobile device on your computer. It replicates hardware behaviors such as CPU, device storage, and memory, along with the software environment.
It’s a great way for you to test how your app interacts with the device hardware, OS, and existing apps without needing an actual mobile unit.
Ideal use cases for emulator testing include:
Testing across different OS versions
Testing across different screen sizes and resolutions
Testing your app’s basic features and screen layout/navigation during the early stages of development
Debugging your app in a controlled environment without worrying about things like battery or network issues
Pros of using an emulator
In-built debugging tools to help you easily find and fix issues
Can mimic a device’s hardware and software on a workstation
Ability to simulate different OS versions with high configurability
Ability to try out risky experiments without the worry of damaging your device
Budget-friendly way to test across multiple devices without actually buying them
Cons of using an emulator
Slower performance than a real device, especially for resource-intensive apps
Limited ability to simulate hardware features such as cameras, GPS, or biometric sensors
Difficulty with replicating real-world conditions like touch responsiveness or behavior under edge cases
Tips to get started with emulator testing
Choose the right emulator for the job. Android Studio and Xcode provide reliable options for Android and iOS respectively.
Make a note of the features you’ll have to test elsewhere, such as camera-dependent features on a real device.
Run your tests for functionality and compatibility and debug any issues on the spot.
Configure the emulator for each of the device versions you’re targeting.
Option 2: Simulators
What is a simulator, and how does it work?
A simulator is a tool that virtually replicates a device’s software environment to help you test your app’s functionality and user interface, just as if it were on a real device.
The big difference between simulator vs emulator is that a simulator is software-specific, and doesn’t mimic any hardware-level interactions. So simulator testing is mainly about the app’s behaviour itself, and not how it interacts with the rest of the device.
Ideal use cases for a simulator include:
Testing early during rapid iterations, as it’s faster than an emulator
Validating app UI, design elements, and basic navigation logic
Testing in an iOS environment with Xcode
Pros of using a simulator
Lightweight and easy to set up
No need to buy physical devices
Best for testing layouts, animations, and other aspects of app UI
Faster to run than an emulator, since it doesn’t replicate hardware
Cons of using a simulator
Inability to test features that rely on hardware
Limited performance testing for real-world conditions or on lower-end devices
Largely tied to a specific platform, eg Xcode only supporting iOS and not Android, making investment in multiple platforms necessary
Tips to get started with simulator testing
Set up the different resolutions, screen sizes, and OS versions and then run your tests.
Install the right tool (typically Xcode for iOS), and remember that Android app testing relies on emulators.
With both simulator and emulator testing, you’ll need to schedule time and a budget for testing on real devices.
Option 3: Real Devices
What is a real device, and how does it work?
A real device is just that – an actual mobile device, like a smartphone or a tablet, that you run tests on. A real device lets you interact with the app in the exact same way an actual user would, giving you the most accurate results in terms of usability and performance.
That’s why, regardless of whether you go for emulator vs simulator in mobile app testing, you’ll need to devote some testing time to real devices.
Ideal use cases for real device testing include:
Assessing how the app handles real-world conditions like battery consumption or memory constraints
User experience elements like touch responsiveness that emulator and simulator testing cannot mimic
Testing across different device models, brands, screen sizes, and so on
Testing hardware-dependent features in your app
Pros of using real devices
Most accurate depiction of app behaviour in real-life contexts
Only option for testing features connected to hardware like GPS or sensors
Authentic feedback on UX elements like touch, gestures, animations, and so on
No limitations due to differences between the real world and virtual emulator/simulator environments
Cons of using real devices
Can be quite costly to build and maintain an up-to-date device lab
High costs of charging, updating, and replacing devices
Time-consuming to test across so many devices
Difficult to cover all possible configurations
Tips to get started with real device testing
Start by setting up a device lab with the device versions most commonly used by your target audience.
Consider using real device testing platforms like TestGrid to access real devices remotely at a lower cost.
Invest in real devices for final validation of the app once you’re done testing on emulators and simulators.
Prioritize testing hardware-specific features and everyday usage scenarios on your real devices.
Emulator vs Simulator vs Real Device: A Tabular Comparison
Here’s a breakdown of how emulators, simulators and real devices compare against each other.
Aspect | Emulator | Simulator | Real Device |
Definition | Mimics both hardware and software of the target device | Mimics on the software environment, not the hardware | Actual physical device used for testing |
Software simulation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Hardware simulation | Yes | No | Yes |
Real-world conditions | No | No | Yes |
Speed | Slower than simulators due to hardware emulation, especially for resource-intensive apps | Faster than emulators due to lightweight design | Real-world speed – depends on device specifications |
Performance accuracy | Moderate | Low | High |
Cost | Free or low | Free or low | High (as device is purchased and maintained) |
Hardware features | Limited support for hardware-specific features like camera and sensors | No support for hardware-dependent features | Full access to hardware features |
Setup complexity | Moderate | Easy | Time-consuming (requires managing devices) |
Debugging | Extensive | Limited | Moderate to extensive |
Advantages of Combining All Three Options
Instead of getting hung up on the difference between emulator and simulator in mobile testing, we recommend using a smart combination of all three options to cover all the bases of testing your app. Here’s how to do it.
1. Start with emulators and simulators
When you’re just starting out with app development, these two are cost-effective and efficient ways to test your functionality and OS issues. Simulators are ideal for checking UI-related features, while emulators are great for debugging issues related to the operating system.
2. Move to real devices for the critical features
As you move towards the final development stages, bring in real devices to test app features that interact with device hardware like cameras or sensors.
Real device testing also lets you see how the app performs under various network or battery conditions and do a final sanity check on how the end user will experience the app.
3. Use device clouds to optimize your costs
You don’t necessarily have to build your own device labs. Cloud-based testing platforms allow simultaneous remote testing across a wide range of device configurations and operating systems. This significantly brings down your testing costs while still giving you the advantage of real device access.
Final thoughts
Let’s circle back to the original question – how to choose between simulator vs emulator in mobile testing? As is clear by now, there’s no single best option.
Emulators, simulators, and real devices all have their role to play in mobile app testing, with the former two offering speed and scalability and the latter offering the crucial real-world validation.
No matter what your app’s purpose is, you’ll benefit from a judicious mix of all three options to optimize its performance and give users a flawless and enjoyable experience. Give this approach a try – your audience will thank you.
Source: This blog was originally published at https://testgrid.io/blog/emulator-vs-simulator-vs-real-device/
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Ronika Kashyap directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3713b/3713bc00bf1ae96d2f878133b1fdd361892481bf" alt="Ronika Kashyap"
Ronika Kashyap
Ronika Kashyap
Experienced Software Tester with 7+ years of ensuring product excellence. Proficient in automation, API testing, and Agile. Achieved 30% test coverage increase. Dedicated to delivering top-notch software.