Difference Between 4D and Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB

Abhijat SarariAbhijat Sarari
3 min read

Introduction

Database management systems (DBMS) are crucial for handling structured and unstructured data efficiently. Among various DBMS solutions, 4D and Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB stand out for their distinct functionalities. This article provides a detailed comparison of these two database systems, highlighting their features, differences, and use cases.

What is 4D?

4D is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that combines a database engine with an integrated development environment (IDE). It is designed for building business applications with an emphasis on ease of use and rapid development.

Key Features of 4D:

  • Relational database capabilities: Supports SQL and NoSQL-like data storage.

  • Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Provides tools for building business applications.

  • Cross-platform support: Works on Windows and macOS.

  • Scalability: Suitable for small to medium-sized enterprises.

  • Customizable: Allows developers to create tailored database solutions.

What is Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB?

Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for PolarDB is a cloud-native relational database service designed for high performance, scalability, and security. It supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle compatibility, making it a versatile choice for large-scale applications.

Key Features of ApsaraDB for PolarDB:

  • Cloud-native architecture: Offers high availability and fault tolerance.

  • MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle compatibility: Supports multiple database engines.

  • Automatic scaling: Dynamically adjusts resources based on workload.

  • Distributed storage: Provides high-speed access to massive amounts of data.

  • Enterprise-grade security: Ensures data protection and compliance.

Comparison Table

Feature4DApsaraDB for PolarDB
TypeRelational DatabaseCloud-Native Relational Database
Primary Use CaseBusiness application developmentHigh-performance cloud applications
PerformanceOptimized for business logicHigh-speed due to distributed storage
ScalabilitySuitable for SMEsHighly scalable with automatic scaling
Data ModelRelationalRelational with multi-engine support
Querying MechanismSQLSQL (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle)
Fault ToleranceManual backup requiredBuilt-in redundancy and failover
IntegrationWindows/macOS applicationsCloud-native applications

Example Use Cases

Example: 4D for Business Application Development

C_OBJECT($record)
$record:=ds.Customer.new()
$record.Name:="John Doe"
$record.Age:=30
$record.save()

This example shows how an object is created and stored in 4D.

Example: ApsaraDB for PolarDB for Cloud-Based Applications

CREATE TABLE Customers (
    ID INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
    Name VARCHAR(255),
    Age INT
);
INSERT INTO Customers (Name, Age) VALUES ('John Doe', 30);
SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE Name = 'John Doe';

This example demonstrates ApsaraDB for PolarDB SQL-based querying.

When to Use 4D vs. ApsaraDB for PolarDB

ScenarioBest Choice
Building business applications4D
On-premise database management4D
High-performance cloud computingApsaraDB for PolarDB
Scalable enterprise applicationsApsaraDB for PolarDB
Multi-engine support (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle)ApsaraDB for PolarDB

Conclusion

4D and ApsaraDB for PolarDB serve different database needs—4D is best suited for business application development and on-premise database solutions, while ApsaraDB for PolarDB excels in high-performance cloud applications and scalable enterprise solutions. Choosing the right database depends on business requirements, scalability needs, and deployment preferences.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Abhijat Sarari directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Abhijat Sarari
Abhijat Sarari