Big War in AI: ChatGPT o1-preview, o3-mini, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet - Which is the Best?

Fatih YılmazFatih Yılmaz
5 min read

As you know, Anthropic announced the new Claude model: Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Developed by Anthropic and released in February 2025, this AI model is the first hybrid reasoning model that combines both general-purpose language processing and logical reasoning capabilities under one roof. Claude 3.7 Sonnet made significant progress with an accuracy rate of 62.3% on SWE-bench Verified, surpassing Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 49.0% rate. Additionally, it achieved higher accuracy rates in tasks related to retail and airlines compared to previous versions. This model is particularly strong in coding and front-end web development. Anthropic also offers a command-line tool called Claude Code, which allows developers to delegate tasks like writing code, testing, and pushing to GitHub. Furthermore, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is designed to better adapt to real-world tasks. It excels in handling complex codebases, planning, and full-stack updates. The model is priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, which is more expensive than some competing models.

1. Natural Language Understanding and Generation

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Offers advanced natural language understanding, capable of interpreting metaphors and cultural references. It supports creative text generation and multilingual capabilities.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: A variant of the o3 model, optimized for coding, mathematics, and science. It provides low latency and high-speed limits, making it ideal for coding and STEM tasks.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Strong in mathematics and coding, with the ability to tackle complex problems through "extended thinking".

2. Coding and Technical Capabilities

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Strong in coding and technical tasks, though not as specialized as o3-mini.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: Offers advanced coding capabilities, particularly in code writing and testing. It achieved an Elo rating of 2,727 on Codeforces.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Superior coding abilities, with high scores on SWE-bench Verified and expertise in code design.

3. Security and Ethics

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Provides more freedom but is less stringent on security and ethics compared to Claude.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: Utilizes "deliberative alignment" to ensure safe and reliable outputs.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Prioritizes security and ethics, designed to prevent harmful content generation, though its ethical boundaries are slightly more relaxed in version 3.7.

4. Speed and Response Time

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Offers fast response times, though not as quick as o3-mini.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: Provides low latency and high-speed limits, enhancing user interaction.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Fast, but lacks web search capabilities, which can be a disadvantage in some cases.

5. Personalization and User Experience

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Analyzes user behavior to provide personalized experiences.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: Offers user-centric experiences, though not as advanced in personalization as o1.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Also user-centric, but not as personalized as o1.

6. Knowledge Base

  • ChatGPT o1-preview: Has a broad knowledge base, though not as current as Claude.

  • ChatGPT o3-mini: Similar knowledge base to o1, possibly more updated in coding and STEM areas.

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Covers information up to October 2024, providing a more current knowledge source in some cases.

Comparison Table

FeatureChatGPT o1-previewChatGPT o3-miniClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Natural Language UnderstandingAdvanced, metaphorsCoding and STEM focusedMathematical, analytical
CodingStrong, but not as specialized as o3-miniAdvanced, code writing and testingSuperior coding abilities
Security and EthicsLess stringentSafe, deliberative alignmentSecurity prioritized, slightly relaxed
SpeedFast, but not as quick as o3-miniLow latency, high speedFast, but lacks web search
PersonalizationAnalyzes user behaviorUser-centric, less personalizedUser-centric, less personalized
Knowledge BaseBroad, not as currentSimilar to o1, possibly more updated in STEMCurrent up to October 2024

Who Wins?

Each model has its strengths and weaknesses, so determining the "winner" depends on the user's needs. Here's a brief analysis:

ChatGPT o1-preview

  • Pros: Offers a broad knowledge base, multilingual support, and creative text generation capabilities. It provides fast response times.

  • Cons: Not as specialized in coding and technical tasks as o3-mini.

ChatGPT o3-mini

  • Pros: Optimized for coding and STEM fields. Provides low latency and high-speed limits, making it ideal for coding tasks.

  • Cons: Less focused on general knowledge and creative writing compared to o1-preview.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • Pros: Strong in mathematics and coding, with superior visual reasoning and code analysis capabilities. Prioritizes security and ethics.

  • Cons: Lacks web search capabilities.

The Winner Depends On:

  • Coding and Technical Tasks: o3-mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet excel in this area.

  • General Knowledge and Creative Writing: o1-preview is more suitable.

  • Visual Reasoning and Security: Claude 3.7 Sonnet is preferable.

Thus, the "winner" is determined by the user's specific requirements.


References

  1. OpenAI Documentation: Details on o3-mini capabilities and performance.

  2. ChatGPT o1-preview Documentation: Overview of its natural language understanding and generation capabilities.

  3. OpenAI Blog: Insights into the "deliberative alignment" approach used by o3-mini.

  4. SWE-bench Verified Results: Performance metrics for Claude 3.7 Sonnet on coding benchmarks.

  5. Codeforces: Elo rating achievements by o3-mini.

  6. Claude Documentation: Details on Claude 3.7 Sonnet's features and capabilities.

  7. Research Papers: Studies on the "extended thinking" capabilities of Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

  8. Sourcegraph Cody: It helped me try these 3 AIs.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Fatih Yılmaz directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Fatih Yılmaz
Fatih Yılmaz

As a 20 years old front-end developer based in Turkey, I lead UnoxDevs, a team dedicated to building exceptional web experiences.