Getting Started with Playwright: A Beginner's Guide
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0182b/0182bfb461f6ccf8bf6c7b03b76a5afa75a296e5" alt="Vishal Khairnar"
Table of contents
- Introduction
- What is Playwright?
- Playwright Architecture
- Playwright vs Selenium vs Cypress
- Why Use TypeScript with Playwright?
- Playwright Installation & Project Setup
- Writing Your First Playwright Test
- Different Ways to Execute Tests in Playwright
- Automatic Code Generation in Playwright (CodeGen)
- Playwright Test vs Jest & Mocha
- Conclusion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9d5d/c9d5df6cc518b98bf6e75b573c9191dab215e6ec" alt=""
Introduction
Web automation is a crucial part of modern software testing. Playwright, an open-source framework by Microsoft, enables fast, reliable, and cross-browser automation for modern web applications. In this guide, we’ll explore Playwright’s features, architecture, installation, test execution methods, automatic code generation, and comparisons with other tools like Selenium and Cypress.
What is Playwright?
Playwright is a powerful automation framework for web testing that supports multiple browsers, including Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. It allows parallel test execution, mobile emulation, and API testing, making it a preferred choice for developers and testers.
Key Features of Playwright:
Supports multiple browsers (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
Works with JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, and C#
Provides headless and headed mode execution
Allows mobile emulation
Supports network interception and visual testing
Enables parallel execution for faster testing
Playwright Architecture
Playwright operates using a WebSocket connection to communicate with browsers instead of HTTP, enabling faster execution and better reliability.
WebSocket vs HTTP Connection:
Feature | WebSocket | HTTP |
Connection Type | Persistent | Request-Response |
Speed | Faster | Slower |
Use Case | Continuous communication | One-time requests |
Example | Playwright, WebSockets API | Selenium, REST APIs |
Since Playwright uses WebSockets, it avoids the latency issues seen in HTTP-based automation frameworks like Selenium.
Playwright vs Selenium vs Cypress
Feature | Playwright | Selenium | Cypress |
Multi-Browser Support | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ❌ Only Chromium-based |
Headless Mode | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Parallel Execution | ✅ Yes | ❌ No (without Grid) | ✅ Yes |
Mobile Emulation | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Performance | 🔥 Fast | 🐢 Slow | 🚀 Fast |
Selenium: Best for legacy systems but slower than Playwright.
Cypress: Best for front-end testing but limited to Chromium-based browsers.
Playwright: Best for modern web testing with full cross-browser support.
Why Use TypeScript with Playwright?
Using TypeScript enhances Playwright testing by adding static typing, better code maintainability, and IDE auto-completion.
Benefits of TypeScript in Playwright:
✅ Type safety to reduce runtime errors
✅ Better autocompletion & intellisense
✅ Easier debugging & refactoring
You can still use JavaScript, Python, Java, or C#, but TypeScript is highly recommended for large test suites.
Playwright Installation & Project Setup
Step 1: Install Playwright
npm init playwright@latest
Follow the setup instructions and choose JavaScript/TypeScript.
Step 2: Open the Playwright Test Project
cd my-playwright-project
Step 3: Run a Sample Test
npx playwright test
This runs the default test cases Playwright provides.
Writing Your First Playwright Test
Create a test file example.spec.ts
inside the tests/
folder:
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
test('Check Google title', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('https://google.com');
await expect(page).toHaveTitle(/Google/);
});
Run the test with:
npx playwright test example.spec.ts
Different Ways to Execute Tests in Playwright
Run all tests:
npx playwright test
Run specific test:
npx playwright test example.spec.ts
Headed mode:
npx playwright test --headed
Headless mode:
npx playwright test --headless
Specific browser:
npx playwright test --browser=firefox
Parallel execution:
npx playwright test --workers=4
Debugging mode:
npx playwright test --debug
Capture screenshots:
npx playwright test --screenshot=on
Record video:
npx playwright test --video=on
Run tests with tracing:
npx playwright test --trace=on
For more execution methods, check this detailed guide.
Automatic Code Generation in Playwright (CodeGen)
Playwright CodeGen records user interactions and converts them into test scripts automatically.
Launching CodeGen
npx playwright codegen example.com
CodeGen Options:
Specific browser:
npx playwright codegen --browser=firefox example.com
Headed mode:
npx playwright codegen --headed example.com
Mobile emulation:
npx playwright codegen --device="iPhone 13" example.com
Save script to file:
npx playwright codegen --output=mytest.spec.ts
Use authentication storage:
npx playwright codegen --load-storage=auth.json example.com
For a complete list of CodeGen options, check this detailed guide.
Playwright Test vs Jest & Mocha
Playwright comes with a built-in test runner, but how does it compare to Jest and Mocha?
Feature | Playwright Test | Jest | Mocha |
Built-in Test Runner | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Parallel Execution | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
Browser Automation | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
API Testing | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Playwright Test is best for end-to-end testing, whereas Jest/Mocha are better for unit testing.
Conclusion
Playwright is a game-changer for web automation with its cross-browser support, fast execution, and rich debugging features. Whether you're a beginner or an experienced tester, Playwright can help streamline your testing process.
🚀 Ready to automate your tests? Start using Playwright today!
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Vishal Khairnar directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0182b/0182bfb461f6ccf8bf6c7b03b76a5afa75a296e5" alt="Vishal Khairnar"