More Classes vs. More Functions: The Eternal Developer Dilemma


If you've been coding long enough, you've probably faced this classic dilemma: Should I create more classes or just add more functions in an existing class? Itโ€™s like deciding between keeping everything in one big suitcase or neatly organizing stuff into multiple smaller bags.

Neither approach is inherently wrong, but choosing the right one can make your code scalable, maintainable, and readable. So, letโ€™s break it down and understand when to go class-heavy and when to stick to functions.


๐Ÿš€ The Case for More Classes

When to Use More Classes?

  1. When You Have Distinct Entities ๐Ÿ—๏ธ

    • If your logic can be broken into separate responsibilities, use different classes.

    • Example: A UserService class handling authentication should be separate from an OrderService handling orders.

  2. Reusability Across Multiple Modules ๐Ÿ”„

    • If the logic needs to be reused across multiple flows, it makes sense to encapsulate it in a separate class.

    • Example: A PaymentProcessor class that multiple checkout systems use.

  3. Encapsulation & Data Hiding ๐Ÿ”’

    • More classes mean better separation of concerns.

    • Example: A DatabaseConnector should not expose direct SQL queries in an unrelated OrderProcessing class.

  4. Scalability & Maintainability ๐Ÿ”ง

    • If functionality is expected to grow significantly, keeping it in separate classes prevents a massive God-class.

    • Example: A NotificationService class can later expand to support SMS, Email, and Push notifications without cluttering another class.

Example: More Classes Approach

public class InternalOrderService {
    public Response placeOrderInternal(String productId, int quantity, String warehouseId, String authToken) {
        return RestAssured.given()
                .header("Authorization", "Bearer " + authToken)
                .post("/internal/orders/place");
    }
}
public class B2COrderService {
    public Response placeOrderB2C(String productId, int quantity, String authToken) {
        return RestAssured.given()
                .header("Authorization", "Bearer " + authToken)
                .post("/b2c/orders/place");
    }
}

โœ… Pros:

  • Clear separation of internal and external logic.

  • Easier to debug and extend.

  • Avoids bloated classes.

โŒ Cons:

  • More files to manage.

  • Might feel over-engineered for small applications.


๐Ÿค” The Case for More Functions in Fewer Classes

When to Use More Functions?

  1. When the Functionality is Closely Related ๐Ÿ”—

    • If all functions logically belong together, putting them in the same class makes sense.

    • Example: MathUtils having functions for addition, subtraction, and multiplication.

  2. If the Class Has a Single Responsibility ๐ŸŽฏ

    • If a class is designed to handle a specific task, it should contain all related methods.

    • Example: FileHandler class with readFile(), writeFile(), and deleteFile().

  3. Avoiding Class Explosion ๐Ÿ’ฅ

    • Overuse of classes can lead to unnecessary complexity.

    • Example: Instead of separate UserLogin, UserLogout, and UserSession classes, a single UserAuth class may be more practical.

Example: More Functions in One Class Approach

public class OrderPlacementUtils {
    public static Response placeOrderInternal(String productId, int quantity, String warehouseId, String authToken) {
        return RestAssured.given()
                .header("Authorization", "Bearer " + authToken)
                .post("/internal/orders/place");
    }

    public static Response placeOrderB2C(String productId, int quantity, String authToken) {
        return RestAssured.given()
                .header("Authorization", "Bearer " + authToken)
                .post("/b2c/orders/place");
    }
}

โœ… Pros:

  • Easier to manage fewer files.

  • Quicker to implement simple functionalities.

  • Reduces over-engineering.

โŒ Cons:

  • Can become bloated over time.

  • Harder to refactor if more logic is added later.


โš–๏ธ The Middle Ground: A Balanced Approach

A pragmatic approach is to start with functions inside a class and split into multiple classes only when necessary. Hereโ€™s a good rule of thumb:

โœ… Use one class with functions if:

  • The logic is simple and closely related.

  • The number of functions is less than 5-6.

โœ… Create separate classes if:

  • The logic is becoming too large (> 300-400 lines of code).

  • Different entities are getting mixed.


๐ŸŽฏ The Final Verdict

ScenarioMore ClassesMore Functions in Fewer Classes
Reusabilityโœ… Better for reuse across multiple areasโœ… If functions are closely related
Complexityโœ… Better for complex, growing applicationsโœ… Better for simple implementations
Maintainabilityโœ… Easier to modify without breaking other codeโœ… Fewer files to manage
Scalabilityโœ… More scalable for expanding logicโœ… Good for small to medium applications

๐ŸŽ‰ Conclusion: Choose Wisely!

Ultimately, thereโ€™s no universal right answer. The best approach depends on your projectโ€™s needs:

  • Start with functions inside a class for simplicity.

  • Refactor into multiple classes as complexity increases.

  • Follow the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) to decide when to split.

Every project is different, but with a little foresight, you can strike the perfect balance between maintainability and simplicity. ๐Ÿš€


๐Ÿ’ก What do you think? Do you prefer breaking things into multiple classes or keeping things together in one big class? Letโ€™s discuss in the comments! ๐Ÿ‘‡

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Himanshu Nikhare directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Himanshu Nikhare
Himanshu Nikhare

I am a Senior Software Engineer at BigBasket with over three years of experience in software development. Specializing in QA automation, CI/CD, and mobile automation, I am passionate about creating efficient workflows and sharing knowledge through blogs and articles. I actively contribute to the tech community through my work, open-source projects, and insightful content. Feel free to connect with me on GitHub or LinkedIn to explore my projects and contributions.