#WorldTok and the Fight to Break Social Media’s American Content Bias

Social media was supposed to make the world feel smaller—a global platform where cultures, ideas, and aesthetics from every corner of the planet could flourish. Instead, many users outside the U.S. have noticed something peculiar: their feeds are overwhelmingly filled with American content. This phenomenon, recently highlighted by the #WorldTok movement on TikTok, sheds light on the underlying biases of social media algorithms that continue to prioritize U.S.-based content over diverse, global voices.

@terryjgeoI've had a lot of new followers from the USA over the past 24 hours and wanted to welcome you to #WorldTok #commonwealthtok #eurotok #globetok #fyp

Tiktok failed to load.

Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser

The California Effect: How American Trends Shape Global Aesthetics

One of the most striking examples of algorithmic bias is how California’s aesthetic has spread globally, shaping everything from home design to fashion trends. This isn’t just about social media—it’s part of a broader phenomenon that some have called the "Airbnbification" of aesthetics.

Thanks for reading Deepa’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

A great example is how every Airbnb rental starts looking the same, no matter where you are. As explained in this article, Airbnb—a California-based company—has subtly standardized how short-term rentals are decorated. Hosts aiming for higher bookings turn to minimalist, neutral interiors with Scandinavian furniture, succulents, and open shelving. This aesthetic traces back to the dominance of West Coast design trends on Pinterest and Instagram.

This same process happens on social media. In its early days, Instagram, Pinterest, Facebook, and Twitter (now X) were all founded in California, meaning the first wave of popular content was heavily influenced by local trends. The algorithms learned from this content, reinforcing and spreading these aesthetics across the world.

Take succulents, for example. They are native to dry, coastal regions like California, yet they became a global interior design trend—not because they made sense in every climate, but because they were visually appealing and constantly surfaced on platforms like Instagram and Pinterest. Similarly, open-concept living, whitewashed walls, and rattan furniture became the "ideal" look for homes, regardless of local preferences or climate suitability.

This homogenization isn't just about visuals—it influences how people design their spaces, dress, and even perceive beauty, often erasing local and culturally significant styles in favor of an algorithmically preferred "global" aesthetic that is, in reality, a California export.

Social Media and the Erosion of Personal Style in Fashion

Fashion has historically been regional, with different countries, cities, and subcultures cultivating distinct styles. However, social media algorithms have flattened fashion trends, leading to a homogenized global look that often originates in the U.S. and spreads rapidly across platforms like TikTok and Instagram.

As highlighted in this piece, algorithms push the same fashion trends to everyone, making it harder for individuals to develop personal style outside of what the algorithm rewards. Viral trends like clean-girl aesthetics, Y2K fashion, or quiet luxury all started as social media trends before becoming the dominant fashion choices globally.

The issue is that these trends aren’t necessarily what people would naturally gravitate toward. They are what the algorithm amplifies because they generate engagement and sales. Once a trend takes off, fast fashion brands quickly capitalize on it, flooding the market with clothing that aligns with what’s trending online.

The Vogue Institute discusses how social media algorithms now shape fashion design itself, leading designers to prioritize what will perform well online over originality. Instead of diverse fashion scenes emerging in different parts of the world, we’re seeing a universalized aesthetic dictated by what trends on Instagram and TikTok—which are, in turn, heavily influenced by American content and consumption habits.

The Business Model Behind Algorithmic Bias

At its core, the reason American content dominates isn’t just historical—it’s financial. Most major social media platforms make most of their revenue from U.S. advertisers. This creates a powerful incentive for their algorithms to prioritize content that appeals to American audiences, which are the most lucrative in terms of engagement and ad spending.

Here’s how the cycle works:

1. American content performs well with U.S. users, who generate the highest ad revenue.

2. The algorithm learns to boost American content because it maximizes engagement and profits.

3. Users outside the U.S. are still exposed to American content since it's what the platform rewards.

4. Non-American creators struggle to gain visibility, as their content isn’t as "valuable" to the platform.

This pattern results in a global feed that feels overwhelmingly American, even for users who prefer to see content from their own country or culture.

#WorldTok and the Push for Global Representation

Frustrated by this imbalance, creators outside the U.S. have started using #WorldTok to highlight non-American content on TikTok. The goal is to help users discover creators from different countries and push back against the overwhelming presence of U.S.-centric media.

The movement has gained traction because it resonates with a broader realization: platforms that claim to be global still operate with a strong American bias. Users worldwide are asking for more algorithmic diversity, ensuring that social media reflects the richness of global cultures rather than amplifying a narrow, California-centric worldview.

Can We Fix the Algorithm?

Fixing this bias isn’t easy, especially since it’s baked into the business models of these platforms. However, some changes could help:

• Geographic Content Prioritization – Algorithms could be adjusted to give users more content from their region, rather than defaulting to U.S.-centric trends.

• Localized Discovery Tools – Platforms could invest in better ways for users to find and engage with content from different cultures, rather than letting the algorithm dictate visibility.

• Algorithm Transparency – Social media companies need to be more open about how their recommendation engines work and whether ad revenue incentives influence what users see.

Conclusion

The rise of #WorldTok underscores a growing awareness of how American content is disproportionately amplified on social media, not because it's inherently better, but because of historical algorithmic bias and financial incentives. From the Airbnb aesthetic to TikTok trends, California’s influence has shaped the digital world—often at the expense of local cultures and creative diversity.

Unless platforms actively work to diversify content discovery, users will continue to experience a social media landscape that flattens global cultures into an Americanized feed, rather than a true reflection of the world’s diversity.

References

• Why Everything Looks the Same – Knowable

• How Algorithms Eroded Personal Style – Fashion Tingz

• Social Media Algorithms Shape Fashion Design Trends – Vogue Institute

• TikTok and the #WorldTok Movement