๐ŸŒ Why Location Matters for SD-WAN | The Case for Cloud Hubs at Peering Exchanges ๐Ÿš€

Ronald BartelsRonald Bartels
3 min read

Traditionally, enterprise networks used a model where all branches connected back to a head office for internet access and inter-branch communication. This made sense when applications were hosted on on-premises servers at HQ.

โŒ But today, with the rise of cloud computing โ˜๏ธ and SaaS apps ๐Ÿ“Š, this design is inefficient and outdated.

โœ… Fusionโ€™s SD-WAN architecture solves this by placing cloud hubs at major internet peering exchanges ๐ŸŒ, such as NAP Africa, rather than routing everything through a corporate headquarters. This ensures:
๐Ÿ’จ Lower latency
๐Ÿ”— Better connectivity
๐Ÿ”„ Improved resiliency


๐Ÿข The Problem with Traditional Head Office Hubs

In a conventional network design:
๐Ÿ” All branch traffic is backhauled to the head office before being routed to its final destination.
โณ This creates an unnecessary extra hop, adding latency ๐ŸŒ and network congestion ๐Ÿšฆ.
๐Ÿ’ฅ If the head office experiences an outage โš ๏ธ, the entire network may go down.

This approach no longer makes sense because:

  • Most apps today are cloud-hosted โ˜๏ธโ€”direct cloud access is needed!

  • Remote work ๐Ÿ’ป has changed traffic patternsโ€”employees donโ€™t need to go through HQ.

  • Peering exchanges ๐ŸŒ are the true core of the internet, not corporate data centres.


๐Ÿ”‘ Why Peering Exchange Hubs Are the Future

1๏ธโƒฃ Direct Access to the Cloud โ˜๏ธ

Large peering exchanges like NAP Africa, LINX, and Equinix are where hyperscalers, ISPs, and content providers interconnect. Hosting an SD-WAN hub here ensures:
๐Ÿš€ Faster branch-to-cloud access
๐Ÿ“ก Direct peering with cloud services
๐Ÿ”„ No reliance on head office for traffic routing

2๏ธโƒฃ Eliminating the Single Point of Failure โŒ๐Ÿ”„

A head office cannot be a reliable core for an entire enterprise because:
โšก Limited ISP redundancy vs. carrier-neutral exchanges.
โšก Lacks direct cloud peering ๐ŸŒ available at major exchanges.
โšก An HQ outage ๐Ÿ›‘ disrupts all branches.

A cloud hub in a peering exchange โœ… ensures branches stay online even if HQ goes down.

3๏ธโƒฃ Scalability & Performance ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ“ˆ

๐Ÿ’ก HQ networks arenโ€™t designed for massive WAN aggregation.
๐Ÿ’ก Peering exchange hubs scale better with carrier-neutral infrastructure.
๐Ÿ’ก Multiple cloud hubs across different regions ensure optimal traffic steering.


๐Ÿข The Head Office Becomes Just Another Branch ๐Ÿ 

๐Ÿ”น In Fusionโ€™s SD-WAN model, the head office is no longer the networkโ€™s coreโ€”itโ€™s just another site like any other branch.
๐Ÿ”น Branches communicate directly via the nearest SD-WAN hub rather than routing through HQ.
๐Ÿ”น Failover and redundancy ๐Ÿ”„ are built into the SD-WAN fabric.
๐Ÿ”น Performance improves ๐Ÿ’จ because traffic follows the shortest, most efficient path.


โœจ Wrap | SD-WAN Hubs at Peering Exchanges Are the Future ๐Ÿ”ฎ

โœ… The head office hub-and-spoke model is outdated โŒโ€”it creates latency and a single point of failure.
โœ… Cloud peering exchanges are the true "epicentre" of internet traffic ๐ŸŒโ€”they provide direct, high-speed access to all cloud providers and ISPs.
โœ… Fusionโ€™s SD-WAN eliminates unnecessary hops ๐Ÿš€, reduces latency ๐ŸŽ๏ธ, and improves uptime ๐Ÿ”„ by treating the head office as just another branch.

๐Ÿ”ฅ The bottom line? In an SD-WAN world, location matters. If your traffic takes inefficient routes, your network performance suffers. A cloud hub at a major peering exchange is the only way to build an efficient, scalable, and resilient network. ๐Ÿ’ช๐ŸŒ

10
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Ronald Bartels directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Ronald Bartels
Ronald Bartels

Driving SD-WAN Adoption in South Africa