๐ Why Location Matters for SD-WAN | The Case for Cloud Hubs at Peering Exchanges ๐


Traditionally, enterprise networks used a model where all branches connected back to a head office for internet access and inter-branch communication. This made sense when applications were hosted on on-premises servers at HQ.
โ But today, with the rise of cloud computing โ๏ธ and SaaS apps ๐, this design is inefficient and outdated.
โ
Fusionโs SD-WAN architecture solves this by placing cloud hubs at major internet peering exchanges ๐, such as NAP Africa, rather than routing everything through a corporate headquarters. This ensures:
๐จ Lower latency
๐ Better connectivity
๐ Improved resiliency
๐ข The Problem with Traditional Head Office Hubs
In a conventional network design:
๐ All branch traffic is backhauled to the head office before being routed to its final destination.
โณ This creates an unnecessary extra hop, adding latency ๐ and network congestion ๐ฆ.
๐ฅ If the head office experiences an outage โ ๏ธ, the entire network may go down.
This approach no longer makes sense because:
Most apps today are cloud-hosted โ๏ธโdirect cloud access is needed!
Remote work ๐ป has changed traffic patternsโemployees donโt need to go through HQ.
Peering exchanges ๐ are the true core of the internet, not corporate data centres.
๐ Why Peering Exchange Hubs Are the Future
1๏ธโฃ Direct Access to the Cloud โ๏ธ
Large peering exchanges like NAP Africa, LINX, and Equinix are where hyperscalers, ISPs, and content providers interconnect. Hosting an SD-WAN hub here ensures:
๐ Faster branch-to-cloud access
๐ก Direct peering with cloud services
๐ No reliance on head office for traffic routing
2๏ธโฃ Eliminating the Single Point of Failure โ๐
A head office cannot be a reliable core for an entire enterprise because:
โก Limited ISP redundancy vs. carrier-neutral exchanges.
โก Lacks direct cloud peering ๐ available at major exchanges.
โก An HQ outage ๐ disrupts all branches.
A cloud hub in a peering exchange โ ensures branches stay online even if HQ goes down.
3๏ธโฃ Scalability & Performance ๐๐
๐ก HQ networks arenโt designed for massive WAN aggregation.
๐ก Peering exchange hubs scale better with carrier-neutral infrastructure.
๐ก Multiple cloud hubs across different regions ensure optimal traffic steering.
๐ข The Head Office Becomes Just Another Branch ๐
๐น In Fusionโs SD-WAN model, the head office is no longer the networkโs coreโitโs just another site like any other branch.
๐น Branches communicate directly via the nearest SD-WAN hub rather than routing through HQ.
๐น Failover and redundancy ๐ are built into the SD-WAN fabric.
๐น Performance improves ๐จ because traffic follows the shortest, most efficient path.
โจ Wrap | SD-WAN Hubs at Peering Exchanges Are the Future ๐ฎ
โ
The head office hub-and-spoke model is outdated โโit creates latency and a single point of failure.
โ
Cloud peering exchanges are the true "epicentre" of internet traffic ๐โthey provide direct, high-speed access to all cloud providers and ISPs.
โ
Fusionโs SD-WAN eliminates unnecessary hops ๐, reduces latency ๐๏ธ, and improves uptime ๐ by treating the head office as just another branch.
๐ฅ The bottom line? In an SD-WAN world, location matters. If your traffic takes inefficient routes, your network performance suffers. A cloud hub at a major peering exchange is the only way to build an efficient, scalable, and resilient network. ๐ช๐
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Ronald Bartels directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Ronald Bartels
Ronald Bartels
Driving SD-WAN Adoption in South Africa