Comparing React Native (Expo) and Flutter: A Developer's Perspective

Ritesh SinghRitesh Singh
4 min read

When it comes to cross-platform mobile development, two frameworks stand out prominently: Expo (built on React Native) and Flutter. Both promise to deliver excellent cross-platform applications, but they differ significantly in several aspects. Let's compare them across key parameters that matter to developers.

Performance: Numbers Don't Lie

Flutter

Flutter's performance is often considered exceptional due to its direct compilation to native code and its rendering engine.

Benchmarks:

  • Startup Time: Flutter apps typically launch in 350-450ms on modern devices

  • UI Rendering: Flutter's custom rendering engine (Skia) achieves ~60fps consistently, even with complex animations

  • Memory Usage: Average memory footprint of ~190MB for a typical app

// Flutter animation example - extremely performant even with complex animations
AnimatedContainer(
  duration: Duration(seconds: 1),
  curve: Curves.fastOutSlowIn,
  width: _isExpanded ? 300.0 : 100.0,
  height: _isExpanded ? 300.0 : 100.0,
  color: _isExpanded ? Colors.blue : Colors.red,
  child: FlutterLogo(size: 75),
)

Expo

Expo, being built on React Native, relies on JavaScript bridges to communicate with native components.

Benchmarks:

  • Startup Time: Typically 700-900ms (standard Expo apps)

  • UI Rendering: ~55-60fps for most UI interactions, but can drop with complex animations

  • Memory Usage: Average memory footprint of ~230MB

// Expo/React Native animation - might experience slight jank with complex animations
import { Animated } from 'react-native';

// In component:
const animatedValue = new Animated.Value(0);

Animated.timing(animatedValue, {
  toValue: 1,
  duration: 1000,
  useNativeDriver: true, // Crucial for performance
}).start();

// Usage with interpolation
<Animated.View
  style={{
    opacity: animatedValue,
    transform: [{ scale: animatedValue }]
  }}
>
  <SomeComponent />
</Animated.View>

Real-world Impact: In apps with highly complex UI or animations, Flutter generally performs better. However, for standard business applications, the difference is often negligible to users.

Syntax Comparison

Flutter (Dart)

// Flutter stateful widget
class CounterScreen extends StatefulWidget {
  @override
  _CounterScreenState createState() => _CounterScreenState();
}

class _CounterScreenState extends State<CounterScreen> {
  int _counter = 0;

  void _incrementCounter() {
    setState(() {
      _counter++;
    });
  }

  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return Scaffold(
      appBar: AppBar(title: Text('Counter')),
      body: Center(
        child: Column(
          mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center,
          children: <Widget>[
            Text('Counter value:'),
            Text('$_counter', style: TextStyle(fontSize: 24)),
          ],
        ),
      ),
      floatingActionButton: FloatingActionButton(
        onPressed: _incrementCounter,
        child: Icon(Icons.add),
      ),
    );
  }
}

Expo (React Native with JavaScript/TypeScript)

// Expo/React Native functional component with hooks
import React, { useState } from 'react';
import { View, Text, Button, StyleSheet } from 'react-native';

export default function CounterScreen() {
  const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);

  return (
    <View style={styles.container}>
      <Text>Counter value:</Text>
      <Text style={styles.counterText}>{counter}</Text>
      <Button title="Increment" onPress={() => setCounter(counter + 1)} />
    </View>
  );
}

const styles = StyleSheet.create({
  container: {
    flex: 1,
    alignItems: 'center',
    justifyContent: 'center',
  },
  counterText: {
    fontSize: 24,
    marginVertical: 18,
  },
});

Key Differences:

  • Language: Flutter uses Dart while Expo uses JavaScript/TypeScript

  • Style Definition: Flutter uses a widget-based approach with inline styles, while Expo uses StyleSheet objects similar to CSS

  • Component Structure: Flutter uses class-based StatefulWidget/StatelessWidget paradigm; Expo follows React's functional components with hooks or class components

Ecosystem

Flutter

  • Package Manager: pub.dev with over 30,000 packages

  • UI Components: Rich set of Material Design and Cupertino widgets out of the box

  • Tooling: Excellent developer tools, hot reload, and well-documented Flutter CLI

  • Community: Strong and growing community with good support from Google

  • Testing: Built-in testing frameworks for unit, widget, and integration testing

Expo

  • Package Manager: npm/yarn with over 1.3 million packages (though not all are Expo/RN compatible)

  • Expo SDK: Pre-built solutions for common mobile features (camera, maps, etc.)

  • Expo Go: Test apps directly on physical devices without complicated setup

  • EAS Build: Cloud-based build service (major advantage over vanilla React Native)

  • Community: Massive JavaScript/React ecosystem; very active community

  • Updates: Over-the-air updates without App Store/Play Store review

Ecosystem Winner: It's a tie, depending on your needs. Flutter's ecosystem is more cohesive, while Expo leverages the massive JavaScript ecosystem and offers exceptional deployment tools.

Ease of Development

Flutter

Pros:

  • Excellent documentation

  • Hot reload that preserves state

  • Consistent behavior across platforms

  • Strong typing with Dart

  • Extensive widget inspector

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve if you're not familiar with Dart

  • More verbose UI code with the widget tree structure

  • Setting up native functionality requires more platform-specific knowledge

Expo

Pros:

  • Easy setup (create-expo-app)

  • Familiar to web developers (JavaScript/React)

  • Expo Go for instant testing on physical devices

  • Managed workflow abstracts away native code complexity

  • Over-the-air updates

Cons:

  • Performance limitations for complex applications

  • Limited access to native modules in the managed workflow

  • Ejecting to bare workflow loses some Expo benefits

  • Bundle size tends to be larger

Development Experience Winner: Expo has a lower barrier to entry, especially for web developers. Flutter offers more control but requires more investment to master.

Conclusion

Choose Flutter if:

  • Performance is your top priority

  • You're building a UI-heavy application with complex animations

  • You prefer a more structured, typed language

  • You want a more cohesive development experience

Choose Expo if:

  • You want to leverage JavaScript/React knowledge

  • Quick development and iteration cycles are important

  • You need over-the-air updates

  • You prefer simplified access to native features

Both frameworks are excellent choices for cross-platform development, with their own strengths and tradeoffs. The best choice depends on your team's background, project requirements, and long-term development goals.

10
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Ritesh Singh directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Ritesh Singh
Ritesh Singh