Performance Pitfalls of Running Fortigate & Palo Alto Firewalls in an Intel Virtualized Environment πŸ”₯πŸ’»βš οΈ

Ronald BartelsRonald Bartels
2 min read

As enterprises move towards virtualized network functions (VNFs) and NFV-based SD-WAN deployments, many choose to deploy traditional firewalls like Fortigate and Palo Alto within an Intel-based virtualization environment (such as VMware ESXi, KVM, or Hyper-V). However, while this approach offers flexibility, it introduces significant performance issues that can impact security effectiveness and network stability.

Why Fortigate & Palo Alto Firewalls Struggle in Virtual Environments πŸ›‘πŸŒβš™οΈ

1. Lack of Native Virtualization Optimization βš™οΈπŸ”—πŸš€

Firewalls like Fortigate and Palo Alto were originally built for dedicated hardware appliances, meaning:

  • Their packet processing engines rely on custom ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) that are unavailable in virtualized environments.

  • The lack of hardware acceleration forces them to rely on software-based processing, drastically reducing throughput.

2. Performance Bottlenecks on Intel-based Hypervisors πŸ—οΈβ›”πŸ’¨

Even with Intel VT-x and SR-IOV support, these firewalls encounter bottlenecks due to:

  • Overhead from hypervisor context switching πŸŒ€

  • Limited multi-core scaling, as certain firewall operations are single-threaded 🚦

  • Interrupt-driven packet processing, which can degrade performance under high loads πŸ”„

3. Virtual Networking Inefficiencies 🌐❌🐒

Traditional firewall vendors often struggle with:

  • Packet duplication in virtual bridges πŸ—οΈ

  • Suboptimal use of DPDK (Data Plane Development Kit) for high-speed packet handling πŸ“¦

  • High-latency virtual NICs, especially when using generic drivers 🚧

Real-World Impact on NFV Deployments πŸŒπŸ“‰πŸ˜±

These inefficiencies translate into:

  • Reduced firewall throughputβ€”a major issue in SD-WAN and high-traffic scenarios.

  • Increased CPU overhead, which affects other virtualized workloads.

  • Inconsistent security enforcement due to processing delays.

The Clavister Advantage | Designed for Intel Virtualization πŸ›‘οΈβš‘πŸ’‘

For organizations seeking a firewall that excels in an NFV-based SD-WAN deployment, Clavister Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) stands out as a superior alternative. Unlike traditional firewall vendors that struggle in virtual environments, Clavister is:

  • Optimized for Intel VT-x and SR-IOV, ensuring minimal overhead in hypervisors.

  • Built with a high-performance virtualized network stack, allowing it to process packets at near-native speeds.

  • Designed from the ground up as an NFV appliance, making it an ideal choice for SD-WAN edge security.

  • Fully compatible with DPDK and other high-performance packet processing frameworks, eliminating common networking inefficiencies.

Wrap | If You're Virtualizing, Choose the Right Firewall πŸ†πŸš€πŸ’°

If you’re running an SD-WAN deployment and need a firewall in a virtualized environment, you might as well choose hardware designed for the job. Fortigate and Palo Alto struggle due to their hardware-dependent origins, whereas Clavister NGFW is purpose-built for Intel virtualizationβ€”making it the superior choice for NFV-based deployments.

The right firewall choice can mean the difference between an efficient, secure SD-WAN and a performance nightmare. Choose wisely! πŸ”₯πŸ’‘πŸ”

10
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Ronald Bartels directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Ronald Bartels
Ronald Bartels

Driving SD-WAN Adoption in South Africa