Performance Pitfalls of Running Fortigate & Palo Alto Firewalls in an Intel Virtualized Environment π₯π»β οΈ


As enterprises move towards virtualized network functions (VNFs) and NFV-based SD-WAN deployments, many choose to deploy traditional firewalls like Fortigate and Palo Alto within an Intel-based virtualization environment (such as VMware ESXi, KVM, or Hyper-V). However, while this approach offers flexibility, it introduces significant performance issues that can impact security effectiveness and network stability.
Why Fortigate & Palo Alto Firewalls Struggle in Virtual Environments ππβοΈ
1. Lack of Native Virtualization Optimization βοΈππ
Firewalls like Fortigate and Palo Alto were originally built for dedicated hardware appliances, meaning:
Their packet processing engines rely on custom ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) that are unavailable in virtualized environments.
The lack of hardware acceleration forces them to rely on software-based processing, drastically reducing throughput.
2. Performance Bottlenecks on Intel-based Hypervisors ποΈβπ¨
Even with Intel VT-x and SR-IOV support, these firewalls encounter bottlenecks due to:
Overhead from hypervisor context switching π
Limited multi-core scaling, as certain firewall operations are single-threaded π¦
Interrupt-driven packet processing, which can degrade performance under high loads π
3. Virtual Networking Inefficiencies πβπ’
Traditional firewall vendors often struggle with:
Packet duplication in virtual bridges ποΈ
Suboptimal use of DPDK (Data Plane Development Kit) for high-speed packet handling π¦
High-latency virtual NICs, especially when using generic drivers π§
Real-World Impact on NFV Deployments πππ±
These inefficiencies translate into:
Reduced firewall throughputβa major issue in SD-WAN and high-traffic scenarios.
Increased CPU overhead, which affects other virtualized workloads.
Inconsistent security enforcement due to processing delays.
The Clavister Advantage | Designed for Intel Virtualization π‘οΈβ‘π‘
For organizations seeking a firewall that excels in an NFV-based SD-WAN deployment, Clavister Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) stands out as a superior alternative. Unlike traditional firewall vendors that struggle in virtual environments, Clavister is:
Optimized for Intel VT-x and SR-IOV, ensuring minimal overhead in hypervisors.
Built with a high-performance virtualized network stack, allowing it to process packets at near-native speeds.
Designed from the ground up as an NFV appliance, making it an ideal choice for SD-WAN edge security.
Fully compatible with DPDK and other high-performance packet processing frameworks, eliminating common networking inefficiencies.
Wrap | If You're Virtualizing, Choose the Right Firewall πππ°
If youβre running an SD-WAN deployment and need a firewall in a virtualized environment, you might as well choose hardware designed for the job. Fortigate and Palo Alto struggle due to their hardware-dependent origins, whereas Clavister NGFW is purpose-built for Intel virtualizationβmaking it the superior choice for NFV-based deployments.
The right firewall choice can mean the difference between an efficient, secure SD-WAN and a performance nightmare. Choose wisely! π₯π‘π
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Ronald Bartels directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Ronald Bartels
Ronald Bartels
Driving SD-WAN Adoption in South Africa