Comparing REST, RPC, SOAP, and GraphQL: A Guide to Popular API Architectures

Pavel RahmanPavel Rahman
4 min read

In modern software development, APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) play a vital role in enabling communication between different systems. However, choosing the right API architecture can be challenging, as each has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this article, we’ll compare REST, RPC, SOAP, and GraphQL, breaking down their characteristics, best use cases, and key differences.

What Are REST, RPC, SOAP, and GraphQL?

Each of these architectures follows a different approach to structuring APIs. Let’s explore them one by one.

1. REST (Representational State Transfer)

REST is an architectural style that structures APIs around resources. It uses standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE to perform actions on these resources.

  • Data Format: JSON (commonly) but also supports XML, YAML, etc.

  • Best For: Scalable and flexible web services.

Example:
To retrieve a user with ID 1:

httpCopyEditGET /users/1

Pros:
✔ Stateless and scalable.
✔ Uses standard HTTP methods.
✔ Supports caching for improved performance.

Cons:
❌ Can lead to over-fetching (retrieving unnecessary data) or under-fetching (requiring multiple requests).


2. RPC (Remote Procedure Call)

RPC is a procedural approach where a client calls specific methods/functions on a remote server. This makes it ideal for microservices and high-performance applications.

  • Data Format: JSON-RPC, XML-RPC, or binary (e.g., gRPC using Protocol Buffers).

  • Best For: Fast and lightweight service-to-service communication.

Example (JSON-RPC request):

jsonCopyEdit{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "getUser",
  "params": { "id": 1 },
  "id": 1
}

Pros:
✔ Simple and efficient.
✔ Faster than REST due to its lightweight nature.
✔ gRPC supports streaming and is highly optimized.

Cons:
❌ Tight coupling between client and server functions.
❌ Less readable compared to REST.


3. SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)

SOAP is a protocol that uses XML-based messaging to ensure secure and structured communication. It is widely used in enterprise applications such as banking and healthcare.

  • Data Format: XML.

  • Best For: Secure and transaction-heavy applications.

Example (SOAP request):

xmlCopyEdit<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
  <soapenv:Body>
    <getUser>
      <id>1</id>
    </getUser>
  </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

Pros:
✔ High security with WS-Security.
✔ Supports ACID-compliant transactions (ideal for financial systems).
✔ Works over multiple protocols (HTTP, SMTP, etc.).

Cons:
❌ Verbose and slow due to XML.
❌ More complex to implement compared to REST and RPC.


4. GraphQL

GraphQL is a query language that allows clients to request exactly the data they need, avoiding over-fetching and under-fetching.

  • Data Format: JSON.

  • Best For: Applications needing high flexibility, such as mobile apps.

Example (GraphQL query):

graphqlCopyEdit{
  user(id: 1) {
    name
    email
    posts {
      title
    }
  }
}

Pros:
✔ Eliminates over-fetching and under-fetching.
✔ Strongly typed schema for better consistency.
✔ Single request can fetch multiple related data.

Cons:
❌ More complex to set up on the backend.
❌ Caching is more difficult compared to REST.


Comparison Table

FeatureRESTRPCSOAPGraphQL
Data FormatJSON, XMLJSON, BinaryXMLJSON
FocusResources (nouns)Actions (verbs)Standardized messagingFlexible queries
SpeedModerateFastSlowModerate to fast
ComplexityMediumLowHighHigh
SecurityModerateLowHighModerate
Best Use CaseWeb APIsMicroservicesEnterprise systemsMobile & flexible APIs

When to Use Which API Architecture?

  • Choose REST if you want a scalable and standardized web API.

  • Choose RPC if speed and efficiency are your top priorities (e.g., microservices).

  • Choose SOAP for secure, transactional applications (e.g., banking).

  • Choose GraphQL for flexible data fetching in mobile or frontend-heavy applications.

Each API architecture has its strengths and trade-offs. The best choice depends on your project’s needs, security concerns, and performance requirements.


Conclusion

Understanding REST, RPC, SOAP, and GraphQL is essential for designing efficient APIs. REST remains the most widely used, but RPC and GraphQL offer performance benefits, while SOAP is the best choice for security and enterprise systems. By choosing the right architecture, developers can optimize API efficiency and enhance user experience.

What API architecture are you using in your projects? Let us know in the comments! 🚀

1
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Pavel Rahman directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Pavel Rahman
Pavel Rahman