Understanding Open-Source Licenses: A Guide for Developers

Table of contents
- 1. MIT License – The Permissive Choice
- 2. GNU General Public License (GPL) – The Copyleft License
- 3. Apache License 2.0 – Permissive with Patent Protection
- 4. BSD Licenses (2-Clause & 3-Clause) – Minimalist and Business-Friendly
- 5. GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) – Strong Copyleft for SaaS
- 6. The Unlicense – Public Domain Dedication
- Which License Should You Choose?

Choosing the right license for your open-source project is crucial—it defines how others can use, modify, and distribute your code. With so many options available, it can be overwhelming to decide which one fits best. In this post, we’ll break down the most popular open-source licenses, their key differences, and when to use them.
1. MIT License – The Permissive Choice
✅ Best for: Projects that want maximum adoption with minimal restrictions.
The MIT License is one of the most popular permissive licenses. It allows users to:
Use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and sell the software
Include the original copyright notice and license in all copies
🔹 Why use it?
Simple and short
Encourages widespread use (used by React, Ruby on Rails, and many Node.js projects)
2. GNU General Public License (GPL) – The Copyleft License
✅ Best for: Projects that want all derivatives to remain open-source.
The GPL (v2/v3) ensures that any modified or distributed versions of the software must also be open-source under the same license.
🔹 Key Features:
Allows modification and distribution
Requires derivative works to be GPL-licensed
Ensures software freedom
🔹 Why use it?
- Protects against proprietary forks (used by Linux, WordPress)
3. Apache License 2.0 – Permissive with Patent Protection
✅ Best for: Projects that want permissive terms with explicit patent rights.
The Apache 2.0 License is similar to MIT but includes:
A grant of patent rights from contributors
Protection against patent litigation
🔹 Why use it?
Used by Kubernetes, Android, and Apache projects
Good for corporate-backed open-source projects
4. BSD Licenses (2-Clause & 3-Clause) – Minimalist and Business-Friendly
✅ Best for: Projects that want minimal restrictions and avoid endorsement issues.
BSD 2-Clause: Allows free use but requires copyright notice
BSD 3-Clause: Adds a "no endorsement" clause
🔹 Why use it?
- Used by FreeBSD, Redis, and early versions of macOS
5. GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) – Strong Copyleft for SaaS
✅ Best for: Projects that want to prevent SaaS companies from using code without sharing changes.
The AGPL extends the GPL by requiring source code disclosure even for network services.
🔹 Why use it?
Used by MongoDB (before switching to SSPL)
Ensures cloud providers contribute back
6. The Unlicense – Public Domain Dedication
✅ Best for: Developers who want to waive all rights.
The Unlicense effectively places your work in the public domain, allowing unrestricted use.
🔹 Why use it?
Maximum freedom (used by SQLite)
Rarely used in corporate projects due to legal ambiguity
Which License Should You Choose?
License | Freedom Level | Best For |
MIT | Very High | Libraries, small projects |
GPL | High (Copyleft) | Projects enforcing openness |
Apache 2.0 | High (Patent-safe) | Enterprise-friendly projects |
BSD | Very High | Minimalist licenses |
AGPL | Strong Copyleft | SaaS & network services |
Unlicense | Public Domain | Complete freedom |
Final Thoughts
Want maximum adoption? → MIT or Apache
Want to enforce open-source derivatives? → GPL/AGPL
Working with patents? → Apache 2.0
Avoiding legal complexity? → BSD
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Abhishek Pratap Singh directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Abhishek Pratap Singh
Abhishek Pratap Singh
DevOps Advocate | Passionate about bridging development & operations to build seamless, scalable systems. Let’s connect and geek out over DevOps, open-source, or the latest in cloud innovation! ✨ Building the future, one pipeline at a time.