Moms are Hashmapping Geniuses - Part 2: Rehashing, Load Factor and an Ever Expanding Kitchen


A Continuation of the Journey
Now that I had a pretty solid mental model of how HashMap
works — and how my mom had been resolving collisions in God Mode all along — something else started to bug me.
Sure, collisions were clever. Linear probing, chaining, jumping around — we had it all under control.
But what about capacity?
Her kitchen never looked full. Never felt cramped. No packet was left out. No drawer was overloaded. No last-minute reshuffling just to make room.
Even as new items kept coming in, week after week — everything still had a place.
I couldn’t help but ask:
“How does this system never get overwhelmed?”
Because in my head, the HashMap should’ve collapsed by now.
That’s when I realized: Mom wasn’t just solving problems. She was anticipating them. Scaling silently in the background — without any of us noticing.
She wasn’t just hashing. She was rehashing — long before I even knew the term.
And like any curious dev at 2 a.m., I opened up my search engine and typed just two words:
HashMap scale?
What is Load Factor?
Remember how my mom’s kitchen never felt crowded?
Even as new packets showed up — somehow, everything still fit. It wasn’t just about drawer space. It was about when she decided it was time to expand.
In the world of HashMap
, that moment is driven by a little number called the Load Factor.
Load Factor Defined (Tech Speak)
Load Factor is a threshold — a ratio that tells the HashMap
when it’s getting too full and might need to grow.
It's calculated as:
Load Factor = Number of Stored Entries / Total Buckets
If this ratio crosses a certain value — typically 0.75
in Java’s default HashMap
— the structure resizes itself (we'll get there in a bit).
🍽 Kitchen Analogy
Imagine your kitchen has 16 drawers. And mom’s personal rule is: "If more than 12 of them are used, it's time to expand."
That 12/16 = 0.75
— the Load Factor.
It's like mom’s internal radar. She doesn’t wait until every drawer bursts open. She scales before chaos hits — proactively, not reactively.
So the Load Factor in a HashMap is that same radar. A quiet little signal saying:
“Hey, things are getting tight around here — time to make room.”
Why Not Just Wait Till It’s Full?
Because performance matters.
As the map gets more crowded, the chance of collisions increases. More collisions mean more fallback strategies — which slows things down.
So to preserve speed, HashMap watches its load factor and expands before performance degrades.
Your mom? She does the same. When drawers start to feel just a little too full — she’s already upgrading to a bigger shelf.
What is Rehashing?
When the Load Factor crosses its threshold, the HashMap
doesn’t panic. It doesn’t start throwing keys out the window.
Instead, it calmly says:
“Okay. Time to grow. Time to rehash.”
What Happens During Rehashing?
Rehashing is the process where the internal array (bucket table) of the HashMap is expanded — usually doubled in size — and all existing entries are re-inserted into this new, larger table.
But here’s the twist:
The position of each key may change in the new table —> because it’s recalculated using the new size.
That’s why it’s called re-hashing — you don’t just copy things over, you re-calculate their place from scratch using the new capacity.
🍽 Kitchen Analogy
Let’s say you had 16 drawers in the kitchen. And now, thanks to new groceries and rising complexity, your mom decides to expand.
She buys a new shelf with 32 drawers.
She doesn’t just move each item randomly. She rethinks — “Hmm, now with more space, where does each item make the most sense?”
So she takes every packet — sugar, salt, coffee beans —and puts them into the new drawer it belongs to, based on the new setup.
The older drawer numbers? Obsolete. There’s a whole new logic in town.
🧮 Rehashing in Steps
Here’s what really goes down when a rehash is triggered inside a HashMap
:
Load Factor Check: Every time a new entry is added, the HashMap evaluates its current load factor — calculated as
number of entries / current bucket size
.Threshold Breach: If the load factor crosses the defined threshold (usually
0.75
in Java), it knows it’s time to grow — before performance takes a hit.New Bucket Array Creation: A brand-new bucket array is created, typically with double the size of the original.
Re-Insertion Begins: The HashMap doesn’t just copy data blindly. Instead, it iterates over each entry in the old array, and for each key-value pair, it:
Recomputes the new hash using the updated capacity.
Inserts the entry into the correct new bucket using the
insert()
method.
The rehashing process is not just a resize — it's a full redistribution of the existing data.
⚠️ Wait — Does Rehashing Hurt Performance?
Yes — but only briefly.
Rehashing isn’t something that happens in the background while your application continues running. It is triggered synchronously when a new key-value pair is inserted and the load factor is breached.
That means: the insertion that crosses the threshold is the one that pays the price. It takes the hit — does the heavy lifting of rehashing — and only then completes.
So while 99.9% of operations in a HashMap are blazing fast O(1), a single insert during a resize might momentarily feel like O(n).
This is why many high-performance applications either:
Pre-define the initial capacity to avoid frequent rehashes.
Use alternative data structures if predictable latency is mission-critical.
So yes, performance can dip for that one insert — but it's a small price for keeping the rest of your kitchen clean, efficient, and lightning fast.
Visualizing Rehashing: Before and After
Let’s make this concrete.
Suppose we had a small HashMap
with capacity = 5 and inserted these keys:17, 67, 32, 43
They’d be placed like this:
🧺 Old HashMap (Size = 5)
Bucket | Entries |
0 | — |
1 | — |
2 | 17 → 67 → 32 |
3 | 43 |
4 | — |
Now, we cross the load factor threshold → time to rehash and double the capacity to 10.
🧺 New HashMap (Size = 10)
Bucket | Entries |
0 | — |
1 | — |
2 | 32 |
3 | — |
4 | — |
5 | — |
6 | 43 |
7 | 17 |
8 | — |
9 | 67 |
Just like that, everything now lands in its own clean slot. No collisions. No chains. Lookup speed back to lightning fast.
Scaling Done Right
And here’s the best part:
Just like my mom never lets her kitchen overflow, HashMap never waits till it's too late.
It monitors the Load Factor quietly in the background. And the moment it senses clutter on the horizon — it doesn’t panic. It grows. It reorganizes. It comes back stronger.
HashMap doesn’t just handle growth.
It’s designed for it.
And now, every time I resize a data structure or bump up a cache… I think back to the kitchen — and silently thank the moms who rehash in real life without ever calling it that.
Next Up? We Build One Ourselves.
We've talked drawers. We've talked collisions. We've talked expansion like my mom upgrades her kitchen.
But what if we tried building a HashMap from scratch — one drawer, one key, one collision at a time?
In the next blog, I’ll try exactly that. No java.util.*
, no magic — just plain code, bugs, and a lot of console prints.
Because moms may be hashing geniuses… but I’m not.
Click here for “Moms are Hashmapping Geniuses, I Am Not — Let’s Code a HashMap in Java.”
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Harshavardhanan directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
