iOS Inside #004 – iOS App Architecture in 2025: From Chaos to Clean, with Purpose


You’ve probably heard of MVC, MVVM, Clean Architecture, VIPER, TCA, Redux…
And maybe you’ve tried applying one of them to your project — and got frustrated halfway through.
The truth is, as iOS devs, we’re often stuck between the code that needs to work today and the architecture that promises to save tomorrow.
This article is about bridging that gap.
It’s not about which pattern is “the best.”
It’s about understanding what really matters when structuring an iOS app in 2025.
And more importantly: how to do it realistically, with purpose, and without falling into the trap of architectural purism.
Why talk about architecture now?
Because apps are getting more complex.
Because Swift has evolved.
And because Xcode won’t save you from a 800-line ViewController.
Architecture matters when:
Your team grows
Your code needs to last
Features start to cross paths
Maintenance becomes a nightmare
Onboarding takes too long
But maybe most importantly:
It matters when you want peace of mind 6 months from now.
The current landscape: what’s actually being used?
If you open 10 iOS codebases today, you’ll likely find:
A bit of MVC (with bloated ViewControllers)
A mix of MVVM (with Combine or plain closures)
Some flavor of Clean Architecture
A growing adoption of TCA (The Composable Architecture)
Most projects today are in a gray zone — not fully chaotic, not strictly structured. And that’s okay.
The real question is:
How do we make it work well?
Architectures you’ll encounter (and what to do with them)
Let’s be clear: no architecture is perfect.
Each solves certain problems — and brings trade-offs.
MVC (Model-View-Controller)
Pros:
Simple to implement
Great for prototypes or small apps
Works well with Storyboards and UIKit
Cons:
Everything ends up in the ViewController
Hard to test
Logic is scattered and tightly coupled
Use it for fast iteration. But extract responsibilities early to avoid the trap.
MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel)
Pros:
Separates presentation logic from the View
Works great with SwiftUI or Combine
Enables reuse of logic across views
Cons:
ViewModels often become bloated
Confusion around what goes where
Can become a different kind of mess
MVVM shines when used with discipline and clean bindings.
Clean Architecture
Pros:
Clear separation of concerns
Makes testing and scaling easier
Encourages maintainable, modular code
Cons:
More setup and ceremony
Requires understanding boundaries and use cases
Can be overkill for small projects
Perfect for long-term projects, cross-platform code, and growing teams.
TCA (The Composable Architecture)
Pros:
Highly testable
Scales well across large apps
Promotes composition and clear state management
Cons:
Steep learning curve
Verbose for small features
Hard to onboard newcomers
Great when you need predictable, scalable, and testable state management.
VIP / VIPER
Pros:
Strong separation of layers
Ideal for legacy or large enterprise apps
Predictable flow and unit testing
Cons:
Too verbose
Lots of boilerplate
Slow to evolve
Still valid in massive apps — otherwise, not so much.
Choosing with purpose: not just because someone said so
Before picking any architecture, ask this:
What am I trying to solve?
Architecture should be a response to a problem, not just a trend.
If you need testability:
Use Clean Architecture, TCA, or a clean MVVM setup.
Focus on separating business logic from UI and injecting dependencies.
If you need scalability:
Modularize by Feature or Domain, isolate concerns, and define clear boundaries.
If you need speed:
Use MVC with good folder structure or light MVVM.
Avoid overengineering. Focus on shipping.
If your team is small or junior:
Avoid patterns with steep learning curves.
Clarity > Complexity.
If you're working across platforms:
Separate business logic entirely from the UI layer.
Clean Architecture with a pure domain layer is your friend.
Modularization: break it down, cleanly
Ways to modularize:
By Layer (
Core
,UI
,Networking
)By Domain (
Auth
,Profile
,Feed
)By Feature (
HomeFeature
,SettingsFeature
) using Swift Packages
Start simple. Extract common components. Separate networking. Then evolve to packages.
Example: from ViewController chaos to clean structure
The “before” (classic bloat):
class LoginViewController: UIViewController {
@IBAction func loginTapped() {
// UI, logic, networking, parsing all here
}
}
The “after” (clean structure):
LoginViewController
: handles UI onlyLoginViewModel
: orchestrates logicLoginUseCase
: defines what to doAuthService
: makes the actual request
Now each layer is testable, clear, and independent.
How to apply this today
Start by organizing your folders by context
Extract shared logic into a
Core
orShared
moduleRefactor small parts incrementally
Choose a style based on your actual needs, not trends
Align your team’s understanding — architecture is culture
Final thoughts
The best architecture is the one your team understands, maintains, and evolves.
It doesn’t have to be pure.
It just has to be clear.
Next episode?
We’ll talk about async testing, snapshot previews, and patterns to scale code across teams and platforms.
Until then:
Build. Run. Refactor. With purpose.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from iOS Inside directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
