Context API vs Redux Toolkit

Sridhar MuraliSridhar Murali
3 min read

๐Ÿง  High-Level Overview

FeatureContext APIRedux
PurposeProp drilling replacementScalable state management
TypeReact feature (built-in)External library
StateTypically global static valuesGlobal dynamic state (app-wide)
Updating StateuseState, useReducerActions โ†’ Reducers โ†’ Store
Middleware SupportโŒ Not built-inโœ… Supports middleware like redux-thunk
DevtoolsโŒ Limitedโœ… Redux DevTools are ๐Ÿ”ฅ
PerformancePoor with frequent updatesHighly optimized with selective subscriptions
ScalabilitySuitable for small to medium appsBuilt for large-scale apps

๐Ÿ” Key Differences (In Depth)

1. Philosophy & Use Case

  • Context API is meant for infrequently changing values โ€” like theme, user auth info, locale โ€” and avoiding prop drilling.

  • Redux is a centralized state container. It's ideal when your app has complex interactions, frequent updates, and multiple views/components needing access to and updating the same state.

โœ… Use Context for: theme, language, auth.

โœ… Use Redux for: shopping carts, complex forms, async data fetching, multi-step workflows.


2. State Update Performance

  • Context re-renders all consumers when state updates, even if they donโ€™t use the updated value.

  • Redux optimizes with connect/selectors, so only components using the updated state re-render.

// Context problem:
<AuthContext.Provider value={user}>
  <Header /> // re-renders when user changes
  <Footer /> // re-renders too, even if it doesnโ€™t use user
</AuthContext.Provider>

This can lead to performance bottlenecks as the app scales.


3. Middleware, Devtools & Debugging

  • Context API has no middleware support (like logging, async logic).

  • Redux has a robust middleware ecosystem (redux-thunk, redux-saga) + devtools that show time travel, action history, diffs, etc.

This makes debugging and async flows far easier in Redux.


4. Code Structure & Scalability

  • Context gets messy when:

    • You have multiple contexts

    • They depend on each other

    • You need to nest them

<ThemeContext.Provider value={theme}>
  <AuthContext.Provider value={user}>
    <LangContext.Provider value={lang}>
      <App />
    </LangContext.Provider>
  </AuthContext.Provider>
</ThemeContext.Provider>
  • Redux centralizes everything in a single store, making it easier to maintain and test.

5. Testing and Maintainability

  • Redux's pure functions (reducers, actions) are easily testable.

  • Context relies more on hooks and nesting, which can complicate unit tests.


โ— Why You Should NOT Use Context API Alone (in large apps)

  1. Performance: Context re-renders can cause unnecessary updates.

  2. Scalability: Context nesting becomes unmanageable in large apps.

  3. Debugging: No time-travel devtools, no logging middleware.

  4. Async logic: Difficult to handle with only useReducer or useState.

  5. No Middleware: No way to intercept, log, or chain actions.


๐Ÿ’ก When to Combine Them

You can actually use them together smartly:

  • Use Context API to wrap your app with one-time configuration (theme, auth, store).

  • Use Redux for the appโ€™s dynamic state and complex flows.

<AuthContext.Provider value={user}>
  <ReduxProvider store={store}>
    <App />
  </ReduxProvider>
</AuthContext.Provider>

TL;DR

Use CaseUse Context APIUse Redux
Static global state (theme, auth)โœ…โŒ
Complex, dynamic stateโŒโœ…
Needs middleware / async handlingโŒโœ…
Small-scale appโœ…โŒ
Large-scale appโŒโœ…
0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Sridhar Murali directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Sridhar Murali
Sridhar Murali

Passionate Frontend Engineer with over 4.5 years of experience in frontend development and a strong previous experience in Quality Assurance of 4 years (2016-2020). Skilled in building responsive, high-quality applications using JavaScript frameworks like Ember.js and React.js, combining meticulous attention to detail from a QA background with a commitment to delivering seamless user experiences. Recognized for writing efficient, accessible code, strong debugging skills