Not Just Numbers: Why Semantic Versioning (SemVer) Is Your Best Friend in Fixing Vulnerable Dependencies
Hare Krishna RaiTable of contents
Hey there, fellow AppSec explorers! Ever stumbled across a version like
0.1.0or2.5.3and thought, “Are these numbers even real or just something the dev randomly typed in?”
Same. Been there. Thought that. 😅
But the more I got into fixing SCA (Software Composition Analysis) issues, the more I realized: SemVer isn't just a versioning system — it's a survival guide. So let me take you on a little journey I wish I'd had when I first started messing with dependency upgrades.
📖 What Is Semantic Versioning Anyway?
Semantic Versioning (a.k.a. SemVer) follows a very specific format:
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
Example: 2.4.1
Each part tells you something super important:
MAJOR (2) — Breaking changes. The library authors are yelling: "Read the docs before you upgrade!"
MINOR (4) — New features, backward-compatible. You might be safe to upgrade.
PATCH (1) — Bug or security fixes. Usually safe. Go go go!
TL;DR: It’s not just a number. It’s a promise.
🚨 Why SemVer Is CRUCIAL When Fixing Vulnerabilities
Let’s paint a picture. Imagine you're working on a Node.js app, and Snyk or Socket.dev tells you:
“You have a known vulnerability in lodash version
4.17.15. Please upgrade to a safer version.”
Now, a rookie move? Jump straight to the latest: 5.0.0. ❌
But if you're not careful, 5.0.0 might completely change how functions work, breaking half your codebase in prod.
🫵 Real Talk: I’ve Been Burned By That
I once updated a vulnerable library to a major version without reading the changelog. Let’s just say my app did... not enjoy that. Logs were red, customers were mad, and rollback was my only friend.
🌟 Smart Fix Strategy:
✅ Find the latest patched version in the same major release (ex:
4.17.21instead of jumping to5.0.0).📖 Read the changelog and commit history.
🧪 Run your tests locally. Like seriously. Run them.
🔒 Lock it down in your lockfile.
🧠 How Tools Respect SemVer (and Help You Too)
Tools like:
...are all smart enough to give you guidance. But they assume you know SemVer basics and apply that judgment.
So don’t just click "upgrade" — understand what you're upgrading to.
📄 Your Cheat Sheet: SemVer Decoder
| Version Change | What It Means | Safe to Auto-Upgrade? |
x.y.z → x.y.(z+n) | Patch - bug/security fix | ✅ Yes, generally safe |
x.y.z → x.(y+n).0 | Minor - new features | ❓ Maybe, test first |
x.y.z → (x+n).0.0 | Major - breaking changes | ❌ No, review deeply |
🚀 Final Thoughts: Version Numbers With Meaning
Next time you see a version like 1.5.6, don’t shrug it off. It’s not random.
It’s:
A signal from the author.
A safety net for your app.
A strategy for your patching.
The deeper I go into secure coding and SCA work, the more I realize: SemVer is underrated.
And once you understand it, your upgrades become smoother, safer, and far less panic-inducing. 🚀
📍 Bonus: Visual Guide
If you haven’t already, check out this quick visual I made for your article cover: 🖼️
If this helped or made you smile — drop a 👍 or comment below!
#AppSec #SCA #DependencyManagement #SemanticVersioning #SemVer #OpenSourceSecurity #SecureCoding #DevSecOps #SoftwareEngineering #PatchSafe
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Hare Krishna Rai directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
Hare Krishna Rai
Hare Krishna Rai
Specialized in uncovering vulnerabilities within software supply chains and dependency ecosystems. Creator of SCAGoat and other open-source security tools. Speaker at Black Hat, DEF CON, and AppSec conferences with research on malicious package detection, dependency confusion, and CI/CD security.