🐳 When CrashLoopBackOff Meets ImagePullBackOff: A Kubernetes Debugging Lesson

Recently, while working on a simple Kubernetes setup, I ran into something strange that looked like a bug, but turned out to be a brilliant teaching moment — one that made me appreciate why Deployments are superior to standalone Pods.

Here’s how it went down 👇

---

🎯 The Setup

I started off with a basic pod.yaml using the official nginx image. Just something like this:

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: nginx
spec:
  containers:
    - name: nginx
      image: nginx

I applied it with:

kubectl apply -f pod.yaml

Everything spun up fine. ✅

But out of curiosity, I wanted to see what would happen if I changed the image to something invalid — so I updated the YAML like this:

image: invalidimagename

Then ran:

kubectl apply -f pod.yaml
kubectl get pods -w

That’s when things got weird.

---

😵 The Weird Behavior

Instead of just showing a simple image pull error (ErrImagePull or ImagePullBackOff), the pod kept switching between:

• CrashLoopBackOff

• ImagePullBackOff

Wait… what? How can the container crash if the image can’t even be pulled?

---

🧠 The Explanation

After a bit of digging (and some head-scratching), I figured it out:

• The original container (using the valid nginx image) had already run and exited/crashed.

• When I updated the image to invalidimagename, Kubernetes did not recreate the pod. It simply updated the container spec and tried to restart the existing container.

• But the new image couldn’t be pulled. So you get:

  • ImagePullBackOff → because the new image is invalid

  • CrashLoopBackOff → because the pod still remembers the last state of the old container, which had crashed.

Kubernetes tracks container restarts inside a pod using the restartCount and lastState fields, which retain historical info from previous attempts — even if the image has since changed.

---

📉 The Pitfall of Raw Pods

This behavior highlighted something very important:

Raw Pods are not replaced or re-created automatically on spec change.

So even if you change something critical (like the container image), Kubernetes won’t cleanly restart the pod. Instead, it will reuse the existing pod, and the old status might still linger — leading to confusing mixed signals.

---

✅ The Better Way: Use Deployments

Deployments, on the other hand, are declarative and immutable:

• When you update a Deployment (like changing the image), Kubernetes creates a new ReplicaSet and a new pod, cleanly replacing the old one.

• You avoid leftover state, get clearer status messages, and enable rollout strategies and versioning.

Here’s a quick example:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: nginx-deployment
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: nginx
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: nginx
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: nginx
          image: nginx

---

💡 Lesson Learned

If you're experimenting or building anything beyond a one-off test, use Deployments instead of raw Pods.

You’ll get:

• Better lifecycle handling

• Automatic pod recreation

• Cleaner, more predictable state

• Built-in support for rolling updates, rollbacks, and scaling

---

🔚 Conclusion

This little debugging journey reminded me how even simple tools can have deep behaviors — and that sometimes, the best learning comes from being confused.

Kubernetes is powerful, but to really understand it, you have to experience its quirks firsthand.

Let your pods break. Then fix them. That’s how you grow. 🌱