Understanding MCP and Agent-to-Agent Protocol: Capabilities, Vulnerabilities, and Security Measures

Overview

As of April 2025, the landscape of AI integration protocols has evolved dramatically with two major standards emerging as frontrunners: the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol. These complementary frameworks are reshaping how AI systems interact with data sources and each other, creating both unprecedented opportunities and significant security challenges. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of both protocols, examining their architectures, vulnerabilities, security measures, and practical applications.

The Evolution of AI Integration Protocols

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has created a pressing need for standardized methods to connect AI assistants with external systems and each other. Before these protocols, integrating AI applications with external tools was an "M×N problem" – requiring custom integrations for each combination of AI application and external tool[7]. This approach led to duplicated effort, inconsistent implementations, and significant security risks.

Two major protocols have emerged to address these challenges: Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Google's Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol. While both aim to standardize AI interactions, they address different layers of the AI ecosystem – MCP focuses on connecting models to tools and data, while A2A enables communication between autonomous agents.

Understanding the Model Context Protocol (MCP)

What is MCP?

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard developed by Anthropic for connecting AI assistants to systems where data lives, including content repositories, business tools, and development environments[3]. Think of MCP like a "USB-C port" for AI applications – a standardized interface that connects AI models to tools and data regardless of vendor[10].

MCP addresses the fundamental challenge of giving AI systems secure, standardized access to the data they need. Rather than requiring custom integrations for each data source, MCP provides a universal protocol that enables two-way connections between AI systems and external tools[3].

MCP Architecture and Components

MCP implements a client-server architecture with three key components:

1. Hosts: Applications the user interacts with (e.g., Claude Desktop, IDE extensions, custom agents)

2. Clients: Components within host applications that manage connections to specific MCP servers

3. Servers: External programs that expose tools, resources, and prompts via a standard API[7]

The MCP specification defines three critical capabilities that servers can expose:

• Tools (Model-controlled): Functions that LLMs can call to perform specific actions (similar to function calling)

• Resources (Application-controlled): Data sources that LLMs can access without performing significant computation

• Prompts (User-controlled): Pre-defined templates to optimize the use of tools or resources[7]

As of April 2025, MCP has been widely adopted across the AI ecosystem, with pre-built servers available for popular enterprise systems like Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, Git, Postgres, and Puppeteer[3].

Security Vulnerabilities in MCP

Despite its benefits, MCP introduces significant security challenges. Recent research has identified several critical vulnerabilities that malicious actors can exploit.

Tool Poisoning Attacks

One of the most severe vulnerabilities in MCP is what security researchers term "Tool Poisoning Attacks" (TPAs)[18]. This vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious instructions into tool descriptions, hijacking the agent's behavior and potentially exfiltrating sensitive data[18][19].

In April 2025, Invariant Labs demonstrated a practical attack where a malicious MCP server could instruct an AI agent to read sensitive files like SSH keys and configuration files containing credentials, then transmit this data to an attacker[18]. This attack is particularly dangerous because:

1. Users only see simplified tool names during confirmation, with actual tool arguments hidden behind simplified UI elements

2. The package/server architecture of MCP enables "rug pulls" where initially trusted servers can later modify tool descriptions to include malicious instructions

3. When multiple MCP servers are connected to the same client, a malicious server can override rules from trusted servers[18]

Command Injection and Privilege Escalation

Beyond tool poisoning, MCP implementations face additional security risks:

• Command Injection: Hackers can hide commands in seemingly innocent content that, when processed by AI assistants, trigger unauthorized actions like data theft or system command execution[4]

• Privilege Escalation: Malicious tools can override the privileges of other tools, gaining unauthorized access to sensitive systems and data[4][5]

• Server-Sent Events Problems: MCP's SSE architecture keeps connections open after data sharing, creating latency issues and potential data tampering opportunities[4]

Security Implications for Organizations

These vulnerabilities represent significant risks for organizations deploying MCP-enabled AI systems. As noted by security researchers, "MCP can be a security nightmare for building AI Agents"[4]. The current implementation often prioritizes functionality over security, leaving systems vulnerable to compromise[4].

Most concerning is that these vulnerabilities could transform AI agents into attack vectors against other systems. Researchers have demonstrated that uncontrolled AI agents can become threats to remote services, potentially conducting denial of service attacks or vulnerability scanning[5].

The Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A)

What is A2A?

In April 2025, Google introduced the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol, an open-source specification for enabling AI agents to communicate with each other regardless of platform or vendor[12]. With support from over 50 technology partners including Atlassian, Salesforce, and Deloitte, A2A addresses a different challenge than MCP – enabling secure, standardized communication between autonomous AI agents[9].

A2A Architecture and Capabilities

A2A implements a client-remote agent communication model with two primary agent types:

1. Client Agents: Create and send tasks to appropriate remote agents

2. Remote Agents: Process tasks and return information or complete specific actions[9]

The protocol provides several key capabilities:

• Agent Cards for Discovery: Simple JSON files that describe an agent's capabilities, skills, and connection methods, enabling agents to find and evaluate potential collaborators[2]

• Secure Communication: End-to-end encryption and role-based access control to maintain privacy and security[2]

• Task Lifecycle Management: A defined process for agent interactions from initial handshake through task execution and result verification[2]

• Real-Time Communication: Support for real-time updates using HTTP, JSON-RPC, and Server-Sent Events (SSE)[2]

Relationship Between MCP and A2A

Google has positioned A2A as complementary to MCP, not a competing standard. The two protocols address different layers of the agent ecosystem[10]:

• MCP: Standardizes how an agent (the model) accesses external tools and data (context)

• A2A: Standardizes how agents engage in dialogues and collaborations with each other (protocol)[10]

As Google's documentation explains, "A2A is an open protocol that complements Anthropic's MCP, which provides helpful tools and context to agents"[10]. Together, they enable multi-agent workflows greater than the sum of their parts.

Securing MCP and A2A Implementations

Given the significant vulnerabilities associated with these protocols, implementing robust security measures is essential.

MCP Security Best Practices

To mitigate MCP vulnerabilities, organizations should implement:

1. Tool Validation: Carefully examine tool descriptions before approval and require explicit user confirmation for sensitive operations[18]

2. Sandboxing: Execute MCP servers in isolated environments with limited system access[5]

3. Security Scanning: Use security tools like MCPSafetyScanner to audit MCP servers and identify potential vulnerabilities before deployment[8]

4. Privilege Restriction: Implement least-privilege principles for all MCP servers and tools[5]

5. Comprehensive Logging: Maintain detailed audit logs of all MCP server activities and agent commands[20]

A2A Security Considerations

For A2A implementations, key security measures include:

1. Strong Authentication: Implement rigorous agent identity verification using secure digital signatures[2]

2. End-to-End Encryption: Ensure all agent communications are protected with strong encryption[2]

3. Role-Based Access Control: Strictly limit agent access based on defined roles and permissions[2]

4. Formal Verification: Consider using formal verification methods to analyze cryptographic protocols used in agent communications[14]

Addressing Identity Sprawl

Both protocols contribute to a growing challenge: machine identity sprawl. As organizations deploy thousands of agents, each with its own identity to authenticate and manage, existing identity and access management (IAM) systems struggle to keep pace[20].

To address this challenge, organizations should:

1. Implement automated credential rotation

2. Enforce granular permissions for each agent

3. Develop comprehensive monitoring for agent activities

4. Establish clear accountability frameworks for autonomous systems[20]

Use Cases for MCP and A2A

Despite security challenges, both protocols enable powerful applications across various domains.

Enterprise Applications

In enterprise settings, MCP and A2A enable:

• Data Integration: Connecting AI assistants to enterprise systems like CRMs, ERPs, and document management systems

• Workflow Automation: Enabling agents to execute multi-step processes across different systems

• Collaborative Problem-Solving: Allowing specialized agents to work together on complex business challenges[9][10]

Development Environments

For software development, these protocols support:

• Code Generation and Review: MCP enables AI assistants to access codebases, documentation, and development tools

• Multi-Agent Development Workflows: A2A allows specialized coding agents to collaborate on different aspects of development

• Lightweight Proxy Implementation: MCP Bridge enables resource-constrained environments like mobile devices to leverage MCP capabilities[1]

Cross-Platform Integration

Perhaps the most significant use case is cross-platform integration:

• Vendor-Agnostic Tools: Organizations can choose the best tools regardless of vendor, with MCP and A2A ensuring compatibility

• Multi-Day Operations: A2A enables complex workflows spanning days, such as multi-day job candidate sourcing[9]

• Specialized Agent Collaboration: Different AI systems with unique capabilities can work together seamlessly[10]

Google's Contribution to AI Agent Protocols

Google's development of A2A represents a significant contribution to the AI agent ecosystem. Rather than competing with MCP, Google has positioned A2A as a complementary protocol addressing a different layer of agent interaction[10].

In the MCP paradigm, Google's A2A provides the "Protocol" part of the Model-Context-Protocol triad[10]. While MCP focuses on how an AI model uses tools and data (the Model ↔ Context connection), A2A addresses how multiple autonomous agents coordinate with each other[10].

By releasing A2A as open-source and enlisting over 50 technology partners, Google has helped advance the standardization of agent communication. This approach promotes innovation while ensuring interoperability across different platforms and vendors[12].

Conclusion

The Model Context Protocol and Agent-to-Agent Protocol represent significant advances in AI integration, enabling more powerful and flexible AI systems. However, as with any technology, these benefits come with substantial security risks that must be carefully managed.

Organizations implementing MCP and A2A must prioritize security alongside functionality, implementing robust measures to protect against tool poisoning, command injection, and other vulnerabilities. With proper security controls, these protocols can enable transformative AI applications while minimizing risks to users and systems.

As the AI ecosystem continues to evolve, the complementary relationship between MCP and A2A illustrates how different components of the AI stack can work together to create systems greater than the sum of their parts. By addressing different layers of AI integration, these protocols are laying the groundwork for a more connected, capable, and secure AI future.

Sources [1] MCP Bridge: A Lightweight, LLM-Agnostic RESTful Proxy for Model Context Protocol Servers https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08999 [2] Agent-to-Agent Protocol: Google's New AI Rulebook - Appy Pie https://www.appypie.com/blog/agent-to-agent-protocol [3] Introducing the Model Context Protocol - Anthropic https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol [4] MCP can be a security nightmare for building AI Agents ... - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rakeshgohel01_mcp-can-be-a-security-nightmare-for-building-activity-7317536567315636225-zKFp [5] Security of AI Agents - arXiv https://arxiv.org/html/2406.08689v2 [6] The Effect of S-Allyl L-Cysteine on Retinal Ischemia: The Contributions of MCP-1 and PKM2 in the Underlying Medicinal Properties https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10816972/ [7] Model Context Protocol (MCP) an overview - Philschmid https://www.philschmid.de/mcp-introduction [8] MCP Safety Audit: LLMs with the Model Context Protocol Allow Major Security Exploits https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03767 [9] How the Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) Actually Works - Blott Studio https://www.blott.studio/blog/post/how-the-agent2agent-protocol-a2a-actually-works-a-technical-breakdown [10] Google's A2A Protocol and the MCP Paradigm: A New Era of ... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/googles-a2a-protocol-mcp-paradigm-new-era-ai-agents-kumar-abhishek-u2lzc [11] Cognitive intelligence routing protocol for disaster management and underwater communication system in underwater acoustic network https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930933/ [12] Google Open-Sources Agent2Agent Protocol for Agentic Collaboration https://www.infoq.com/news/2025/04/google-agentic-a2a/ [13] Abstract 6835: Profiling of new prostate cancer vulnerabilities through single-nucleus RNAseq implicates the CAF-specific TGF-β pathway in tumor progression https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/419e26f2b330d192d9b2275d52ef1e259cecaec5 [14] CryptoFormalEval: Integrating LLMs and Formal Verification for Automated Cryptographic Protocol Vulnerability Detection https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13627 [15] Analysis of the Data Flow in the Newscast Protocol for Possible Vulnerabilities https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0313874f29f1d72854486b835a617ea0b1d1279 [16] Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Traditional Finance and Decentralized Finance https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0088db97c342e49d2d54466b9fab2752e2896a3f [17] Mobile Agent Security Using ID-Based Agreement Protocol and Binary Serialization https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d80dd9d42246ea8466a639e7d1b1ad8df7b680c3 [18] MCP Security Notification: Tool Poisoning Attacks - Invariant Labs https://invariantlabs.ai/blog/mcp-security-notification-tool-poisoning-attacks [19] We have discovered a critical vulnerability in MCP, which is widely ... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/marc-fischer-b047571b1_we-have-discovered-a-critical-vulnerability-activity-7312810299005272065-d7yK [20] Why MCP Agents Are the Next Cyber Battleground - Lasso Security https://www.lasso.security/blog/why-mcp-agents-are-the-next-cyber-battleground [21] Pandemic Simulator: An Agent-Based Framework with Human Behavior Modeling for Pandemic-Impact Assessment to Build Sustainable Communities https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba2486af5d7f1198e1ed90d1d634d55d1efdc3e0 [22] Preventing 5-fluorouracil-induced ischemic events in very high-risk cardiac patients: A retrospective cohort analysis (SQCCCRC protocol). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d819dd71c6ede7993d1a87f0db15f830e95c69c [23] LLMs with the Model Context Protocol Allow Major Security Exploits https://arxiv.org/html/2504.03767v2 [24] MCP Servers: The New Security Nightmare - Equixly https://equixly.com/blog/2025/03/29/mcp-server-new-security-nightmare/ [25] The Security Risks of Model Context Protocol (MCP) https://www.pillar.security/blog/the-security-risks-of-model-context-protocol-mcp [26] Uncovering MCP Security: Threat Mapping and Vulnerability ... https://www.querypie.com/resources/discover/white-paper/18/uncovering-mcp-security [27] Agentless vs Agent-Based Security - Palo Alto Networks https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-the-difference-between-agent-based-and-agentless-security [28] Model Context Protocol has prompt injection security problems https://simonwillison.net/2025/Apr/9/mcp-prompt-injection/ [29] What is The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) and Why You Must Learn It ... https://huggingface.co/blog/lynn-mikami/agent2agent [30] Protocols for Agentic AI: Google's New A2A Joins Viral MCP https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2025/04/09/protocols-for-agentic-ai-googles-new-a2a-joins-viral-mcp.aspx [31] Understanding and mitigating security risks in MCP implementations https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoft-security-blog/understanding-and-mitigating-security-risks-in-mcp-implementations/4404667 [32] 5 Reasons Why Agent-Based Scanning Can't be Your Only Defense https://www.edgescan.com/5-reasons-why-agent-based-scanning-cant-be-your-only-defense/ [33] Why Your Company Should Know About Model Context Protocol https://www.nasuni.com/blog/why-your-company-should-know-about-model-context-protocol/ [34] Google scholar citation in retrospect: Visibility and contributions of African scholars https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f1b4a320a4674d38d997e22a596c03d4a356e96 [35] Advancing search engine studies: The evolution of Google critique and intervention https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fa1cf934be026cfc66c467d111850d470d4e0e6 [36] What Is Google Drive MCP? Exploring the Model Context Protocol ... https://www.getguru.com/reference/google-drive-mcp [37] MCP Open-Source Contribution: How to Get Involved - BytePlus https://www.byteplus.com/en/topic/541307 [38] Announcing the Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) https://developers.googleblog.com/en/a2a-a-new-era-of-agent-interoperability/ [39] Google Gemini MCP - Activepieces https://www.activepieces.com/mcp/google-gemini [40] MCP, authentication & authorization, and Durable Objects free tier https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-ai-agents-with-mcp-authn-authz-and-durable-objects/ [41] What Is MCP, and Why Is Everyone – Suddenly!– Talking About It? https://huggingface.co/blog/Kseniase/mcp [42] MCP tools - Agent Development Kit - Google https://google.github.io/adk-docs/tools/mcp-tools/ [43] Build and manage multi-system agents with Vertex AI - Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/build-and-manage-multi-system-agents-with-vertex-ai [44] google/A2A: An open protocol enabling communication ... - GitHub https://github.com/google/A2A [45] How Competition Affects Contributions to Open Source Platforms: Evidence from OpenStreetMap and Google Maps https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24549bc25e2fb7da6e9367e9b7ac676fe59f4148 [46] The Dynamic Monitoring and Driving Forces Analysis of Ecological Environment Quality in the Tibetan Plateau Based on the Google Earth Engine https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf12cd4d642f6393eb85974ca668bf19ea54f04b [47] Redefining Healthcare With Artificial Intelligence (AI): The Contributions of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Co-pilot https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077095/ [48] Google Summer of Code: Student Motivations and Contributions https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.05798 [49] Google Earth Engine: A Global Analysis and Future Trends https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a27bdd2cd699c943a35844d789848ff2a9b9238 [50] Use of Google Street View to Assess Environmental Contributions to Pedestrian Injury. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26794155/ [51] Examples and tutorials on using Google Colab and Gradio to create online interactive student-learning modules https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47000451f80e8810c32f160563941635d6906f21 [52] Understanding Model Context Protocol (MCP): An Open Standard ... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/understanding-model-context-protocol-mcp-open-standard-manish-katyan-no7bc [53] Model Context Protocol Server - Home Assistant https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/mcp_server/ [54] MCP Security Checklist: A Security Guide for the AI Tool Ecosystem https://github.com/slowmist/MCP-Security-Checklist [55] What Is the A2A (Agent2Agent) Protocol and How It Works - Descope https://www.descope.com/learn/post/a2a