🧰 Choosing the Right JavaScript Package Manager: npm vs Yarn vs pnpm vs Bun

Table of contents
- 📦 1. npm — The OG (Node Package Manager)
- ✅ Pros:
- ❌ Cons:
- 🎯 Ideal For:
- 🚫 Avoid If:
- 🔧 Example:
- 🧶 2. Yarn — The Deterministic Pioneer
- ✅ Pros:
- ❌ Cons:
- 🎯 Ideal For:
- 🚫 Avoid If:
- 🔧 Example:
- 🌱 3. pnpm — Performance & Efficiency First
- ✅ Pros:
- ❌ Cons:
- 🎯 Ideal For:
- 🚫 Avoid If:
- 🔧 Example:
- ⚡️ 4. Bun — The All-In-One Newcomer
- ✅ Pros:
- ❌ Cons:
- 🎯 Ideal For:
- 🚫 Avoid If:
- 🔧 Example:
- 🧾 Quick Comparison Table — TL; DR
- 🧠 Final Thoughts: What Should You Use?

When building JavaScript applications, your choice of package manager can have a big impact on development speed, reliability, and even how much space your dependencies take up.
With options like npm, Yarn, pnpm, and the rising star Bun, developers often ask:
“Which one should I use and why?”
In this post, I’ll break down what each package manager offers, where it shines, where it falls short, and when you should (or shouldn’t) use it.
📦 1. npm — The OG (Node Package Manager)
✅ Pros:
Comes bundled with Node.js, so it’s always available out of the box.
Huge community support and ecosystem.
Familiar to almost every JavaScript developer.
❌ Cons:
Slower installations compared to newer tools.
Can duplicate a lot of dependencies across projects.
Less efficient use of disk space.
Limited monorepo support (requires external tools like Lerna).
🎯 Ideal For:
Simpler projects or teams already using it.
Projects where compatibility and stability matter more than performance.
🚫 Avoid If:
You want maximum speed and disk efficiency.
You’re managing a large monorepo.
🔧 Example:
Installing React:
npm install react react-dom
Running a script:
npm run build
Creating a package.json:
npm init -y
🧶 2. Yarn — The Deterministic Pioneer
Created by Facebook, Yarn was built to solve npm’s early shortcomings by offering speed, determinism, and better dependency resolution.
✅ Pros:
Faster than npm, especially with caching.
Deterministic installs via yarn.lock.
Built-in support for monorepos (workspaces).
Yarn 2+ (Berry) introduces innovative features like Plug’n’Play (PnP), which removes node_modules.
❌ Cons:
Yarn 2+ is a significant shift from v1 (some breaking changes).
Plug’n’Play can break some older packages that expect node_modules.
🎯 Ideal For:
Projects needing monorepos or strict dependency management.
Teams that want modern tooling with good performance.
🚫 Avoid If:
- You rely on legacy packages or tooling that assume traditional node_modules.
🔧 Example:
Installing React:
yarn add react react-dom
Running a script:
yarn build
Then:
yarn install
🌱 3. pnpm — Performance & Efficiency First
pnpm is all about speed and disk efficiency. It introduces a unique way of storing dependencies using hard links to a global store, saving space and avoiding duplication.
✅ Pros:
Blazing fast installs.
Uses up to 70% less disk space than npm/Yarn.
Enforces strict dependency declarations (no more accidental access to undeclared packages).
Excellent built-in support for monorepos.
❌ Cons:
Slight learning curve due to its non-standard node_modules layout.
Some tools (very few nowadays) might expect npm-style layouts.
🎯 Ideal For:
Projects with large dependency trees.
Monorepos and enterprise-scale applications.
Teams that value speed and discipline
🚫 Avoid If:
- You’re using very old tooling or dependencies that don’t like non-standard layouts (rare these days).
🔧 Example:
Installing React:
pnpm add react react-dom
Running a script:
pnpm run build
Creating a pnpm workspace:
# pnpm-workspace.yaml packages: - 'apps/' - 'packages/'yam
Then:
pnpm install
⚡️ 4. Bun — The All-In-One Newcomer
Bun is more than a package manager — it’s an entire JavaScript runtime, bundler, and test runner, written in Zig. It’s designed from the ground up for speed.
✅ Pros:
Ridiculously fast installs (and everything else).
Bundler, transpiler, test runner, and runtime — all in one.
TypeScript support out of the box.
Modern APIs and first-class ES module support.
❌ Cons:
Still evolving — some features and compatibility can be hit-or-miss.
Not yet widely adopted or battle-tested like Node/npm.
Some Node.js APIs and npm packages may not be fully supported.
🎯 Ideal For:
Side projects, prototypes, and developers chasing the bleeding edge.
Projects where speed matters above all else.
🚫 Avoid If:
- You need long-term production stability and full compatibility with the Node/npm ecosystem (for now).
🔧 Example:
Installing React:
bun add react react-dom
Running a script:
bun run build
Creating a new project:
bun i
Running a dev server:
bun dev
🧾 Quick Comparison Table — TL; DR
🧠 Final Thoughts: What Should You Use?
🟢 pnpm — Best all-around for performance, workspaces, and modern development.
🔵 Yarn — Great for monorepos and larger teams (just mind the Yarn 2+ learning curve).
🔴 npm — Reliable and compatible, good for legacy or simple apps.
⚡ Bun — For speed-loving early adopters and greenfield projects.
💬 Have a favorite or horror story with one of these? Let me know in the comments! And if you found this post helpful, give it a clap 👏 or share it with your fellow devs!
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Kirtesh Bansal directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
