Synchronization Usage in Selenium WebDriver

Synchronization is a critical concept in Selenium WebDriver automation, ensuring that scripts wait for web elements to load before interacting with them. Without proper synchronization, scripts can fail due to timing issues, such as attempting to interact with elements that haven't yet appeared on the page. This blog covers everything you need to know about synchronization: implicit wait, explicit wait, fluent wait, and thread.sleep with real-world examples and best practices.

What is Synchronization in Selenium WebDriver?

Synchronization ensures that your Selenium scripts wait appropriately for web elements to be ready before interacting with them. For example? Think about searching for flights: you select a date, click "Search," and the results page takes a few seconds to load. If Selenium tries to click on a result immediately after hitting "Search," it will fail because the elements aren't loaded yet.

Without proper synchronization:

• Selenium throws NoSuchElementException.

• Scripts fail even when the application works perfectly for users.

Thus, we need to instruct Selenium to wait until the web page is ready before proceeding.

Four Synchronization Techniques in Selenium WebDriver

There are four main ways to achieve synchronization:

1. Implicit Wait

2. Explicit Wait

3. Thread.sleep

4. Fluent Wait

   

Each method has its own use cases, advantages, and disadvantages. Let’s explore them in detail.

1. Implicit Wait

What is Implicit Wait?

An implicit wait tells the WebDriver to wait for a certain amount of time globally before throwing an exception if elements are not immediately available. For example, if you set an implicit wait of 5 seconds, Selenium will wait up to 5 seconds for an element to appear before failing.

How It Works

When you instantiate a WebDriver (e.g., WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver();), you can set the implicit wait as follows:

driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(Duration.ofSeconds(5));

This tells Selenium to wait up to 5 seconds for every command (e.g., findElement) throughout the test case. If the element appears sooner (e.g., in 2 seconds), Selenium proceeds immediately without waiting the full 5 seconds. This is because implicit wait continuously polls the Document Object Model (DOM) to check for the element’s presence.

Advantages of Implicit Wait

• Global Application: You define it once, and it applies to all commands in the test case until the WebDriver instance is destroyed. This is ideal for test cases with multiple steps, each requiring small waits (e.g., 2–3 seconds per page load).

• Simplified Code: Since it’s set globally, you don’t need to add wait logic for each element, making the code cleaner and more readable.

• Dynamic Waiting: Implicit wait doesn’t force the script to wait the full duration. If the element is found earlier, execution resumes immediately.

Disadvantages of Implicit Wait

• Hides Performance Issues: By applying a global wait (e.g., 5 seconds), implicit wait can mask performance bugs. For instance, if a page should load in 2 seconds but takes 4 seconds, the test passes due to the 5-second wait, hiding the issue.

• Inflexibility: The same wait time applies to all steps, which may not be suitable for scenarios requiring longer waits (e.g., a search returning 10,000 results taking 15 seconds).

Example Scenario

Consider a test case with 100 steps, each navigating to a new page that takes 2–3 seconds to load. Setting an implicit wait of 5 seconds ensures the script waits for each page to load without failing. However, if one step (e.g., searching for hotels across an entire country) takes 15 seconds, the implicit wait of 5 seconds is insufficient, causing the test to fail.

2. Explicit Wait

What is Explicit Wait?

Explicit wait, unlike implicit wait, is applied to specific elements or conditions. It allows you to define a wait for a particular element (e.g., wait until an element is visible or clickable) without affecting other steps. Explicit wait is implemented using the WebDriverWait class or, in some cases, fluent wait (a subtype of explicit wait).

How It Works

Explicit wait uses the WebDriverWait class to wait for a specific condition, such as an element’s visibility or clickability. The syntax is:

WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, Duration.ofSeconds(5));
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.visibilityOfElementLocated(By.cssSelector("elementId")));

Here, Selenium waits up to 5 seconds for the element to become visible. If the element appears sooner, execution continues immediately.

Types of Explicit Wait

Explicit wait can be implemented in two ways:

• WebDriverWait: The most common approach, using predefined conditions like visibilityOfElementLocated or elementToBeClickable.

• Fluent Wait: A more customizable approach that allows polling at regular intervals.

Advantages of Explicit Wait

• Targeted Waiting: Applies only to specific elements, avoiding unnecessary waits for other steps. This prevents masking performance issues in unrelated parts of the application.

• Flexibility: You can define different wait times and conditions for different elements (e.g., 15 seconds for a slow-loading element, 5 seconds for others).

• No Performance Impact: Since it’s not global, it doesn’t slow down the entire test suite.

Disadvantages of Explicit Wait

• More Code: You need to write additional lines for each element requiring a wait, making the code less concise compared to implicit wait.

• Complexity: Requires understanding of expected conditions and proper syntax, which can be challenging for beginners.

Real-World Example

Imagine booking hotels where normally results load fast, but some results take longer (~15 seconds).

• If you increase implicit wait globally to 15 seconds, all tests slow down unnecessarily.

• Better: Use explicit wait only for that particular search.

3. Thread.sleep

What is Thread.sleep?

Thread.sleep is a Java method that pauses the execution of the entire script for a fixed duration, regardless of whether the element is available. It’s not part of Selenium and belongs to Java but is sometimes used in automation scripts.

How It Works

Thread.sleep(5000); // Pauses execution for 5 seconds

This halts the script for exactly 5 seconds, even if the element appears sooner or later.

Advantages of Thread.sleep

• Simplicity: Easy to implement with a single line of code.

• Guaranteed Wait: Ensures the script waits for the specified duration, useful for debugging or practice.

Disadvantages of Thread.sleep

• Static Waiting: Unlike implicit or explicit waits, it doesn’t check the DOM or element availability. If the element appears in 1 second, the script still waits the full 5 seconds, wasting time.

• Inefficiency: If the element takes longer than the specified time, the script fails, requiring manual adjustment.

• Not Recommended: In real-time projects, Thread.sleep is discouraged because it slows down execution and lacks intelligence to adapt to dynamic page loading.

Why Avoid Thread.sleep?

Implicit and explicit waits are smarter because they monitor the DOM and proceed as soon as the element is available. Thread.sleep is only suitable for quick prototyping or debugging, not for production-grade automation.

4. Fluent Wait

What is Fluent Wait?

Fluent wait is a type of explicit wait that allows you to define a maximum timeout and a polling interval for checking an element’s availability. It’s more customizable than WebDriverWait but less commonly used.

How It Works

Fluent wait polls the DOM at regular intervals (e.g., every 3 seconds) until the element is found or the timeout is reached. If the element appears between polling intervals, the script waits until the next poll to proceed.

The syntax is:

Wait<WebDriver> wait = new FluentWait<>(driver)
    .withTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(30))
    .pollingEvery(Duration.ofSeconds(3))
    .ignoring(NoSuchElementException.class);

WebElement element = wait.until(driver -> {
    WebElement webElement = driver.findElement(By.cssSelector("elementId"));
    if (webElement.isDisplayed()) {
        return webElement;
    }
    return null;
});

Here, Selenium waits up to 30 seconds, checking every 3 seconds for the element. If the element is found, it returns immediately; otherwise, it continues polling until the timeout.

Key Differences from WebDriverWait

• Polling Interval: Fluent wait checks the DOM at specified intervals (e.g., every 3 seconds), while WebDriverWait continuously monitors the DOM.

• Custom Conditions: Fluent wait requires you to define custom conditions (e.g., isDisplayed), whereas WebDriverWait provides predefined conditions like visibilityOfElementLocated.

• Complexity: Fluent wait involves more complex code, making it less straightforward than WebDriverWait.

Advantages of Fluent Wait

• Customizable Polling: Allows you to control how frequently Selenium checks for the element, which can be useful in specific scenarios.

• Targeted Waiting: Like WebDriverWait, it applies only to specific elements, avoiding global performance impacts.

Disadvantages of Fluent Wait

• Complex Code: Requires writing custom conditions, increasing code complexity and maintenance effort.

• Rare Use Cases: Most scenarios can be handled with WebDriverWait, making fluent wait less popular in real-time projects.

• Potential Delays: If an element appears between polling intervals (e.g., at 2.5 seconds with a 3-second polling interval), the script waits until the next poll (3 seconds), introducing slight delays.

Practical Implementation

In a test on Internet HerokuApp, the script clicks a "Start" button and waits for a "Hello World" message to appear. Using fluent wait:

Wait<WebDriver> wait = new FluentWait<>(driver)
    .withTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(30))
    .pollingEvery(Duration.ofSeconds(3))
    .ignoring(NoSuchElementException.class);

WebElement element = wait.until(driver -> {
    WebElement webElement = driver.findElement(By.cssSelector("#finish h4"));
    if (webElement.isDisplayed()) {
        return webElement;
    }
    return null;
});

System.out.println(element.getText()); // Outputs: "Hello World!"

The script waits up to 30 seconds, polling every 3 seconds, until the "Hello World" message is visible. If the element is already present but invisible, the custom condition (isDisplayed) ensures the script waits until it’s visible.

Comparison of the Synchronization Techniques in Selenium WebDriver

---

Best Practices for Synchronization

1. Combine Implicit and Explicit Waits:

   • Use implicit wait for general-purpose delays (e.g., 5 seconds globally) to handle consistent page loads.

   • Use explicit wait for specific elements requiring longer or unique conditions (e.g., 15 seconds for a slow-loading search result).

   • This hybrid approach balances code simplicity and performance.

2. Avoid Thread.sleep:

   • Reserve Thread.sleep for debugging or prototyping. In production, use implicit or explicit waits for dynamic waiting.

3. Limit Implicit Wait Duration:

   • Keep implicit wait durations low (e.g., 5–10 seconds) to avoid hiding performance issues. Adjust based on application performance standards.

4. Use Explicit Wait for Critical Elements:

   • Apply explicit wait to elements with unpredictable or longer load times, such as search results or confirmation messages.

5. Understand Application Behavior:

   • Analyze your application’s performance in different environments (e.g., UAT vs. production) to decide between implicit and explicit waits.

   • For inconsistent applications, implicit wait is safer. For stable applications, explicit wait is more precise.

6. Use Fluent Wait Sparingly:

   • Reserve fluent wait for rare scenarios requiring custom polling, such as sequential messages with identical locators.

   • In most cases, WebDriverWait is sufficient and simpler.

7. Optimize Code Structure:

   • Encapsulate repetitive logic (e.g., adding items to the cart) in utility methods to keep tests clean and maintainable.

   • Validate locators (e.g., CSS, XPath) using tools like ChroPath to ensure accuracy.

8. Test in Realistic Environments:

   • To make sure your system works well, test it in an environment that is similar to the real-world setting where it will be used. This helps you find out if there are any problems that could affect how well it performs.

   • Avoid over-relying on waits to mask application slowness; report performance bugs to developers.

Conclusion

Synchronization in Selenium WebDriver is not just about "waiting" - it's about waiting smartly.
Choosing the right wait strategy ensures your automation framework is reliable, fast, and reflective of real-world user experience.

Check out the complete Selenium Series for more such articles.

For practical and sample code examples related to synchronization check the GitHub repo attached below: