Which FPGA is Better Spartan 6 FPGA Development Board – xc6slx9-tqg144 or xc3s500e?


Technical Specifications Comparison
Feature | XC6SLX9-TQG144 (Spartan-6) | XC3S500E (Spartan-3E) |
FPGA Family | Spartan-6 (45nm) | Spartan-3E (90nm) |
Logic Cells | 9,152 | 5,292 |
Slices | 1,430 | 931 |
Block RAM (kb) | 576 | 360 |
DSP Slices | 16 | 20 |
Max User I/Os | 102 | 172 |
Clock Management | 4 DCMs + 2 PLLs | 4 DCMs |
Memory Controller | MCB (DDR2/3) | None |
Power Consumption | Lower (~30% less) | Higher |
Supported I/O Standards | More (including LVDS) | Fewer |
Key Differences
1. Architecture & Performance
Spartan-6 (XC6SLX9):
More modern 45nm technology
Higher logic density (more functionality per chip)
Better clock structure with PLLs
Supports DDR2/3 memory (MCB)
Spartan-3E (XC3S500E):
Older 90nm technology
More DSP blocks (for signal processing)
More I/O pins (172 vs. 102)
2. Development & Support
Spartan-6:
Still supported by Xilinx (though not recommended for new designs)
Compatible with modern Vivado tools (with limitations)
Spartan-3E:
Legacy product (requires ISE tools)
Limited support
3. Application Areas
XC6SLX9 is better for:
Projects requiring DDR memory
Low-power applications
Designs with complex clock management
Prototyping for more modern FPGAs
XC3S500E is better for:
Signal processing tasks (more DSP resources)
Projects requiring numerous I/Os
Simple learning projects (simpler architecture)
Cost-sensitive applications
Recommendation
Choose the Spartan-6 XC6SLX9 board if:
You need modern features like DDR memory controllers
Low-power design is important
You want to work with more current development tools
Future-oriented prototyping is needed
Choose the Spartan-3E XC3S500E board if:
You require extensive DSP operations
The higher number of I/O pins is critical
You can work with older ISE tools
Budget is a primary concern (often cheaper on the secondary market)
Development Tools
Spartan-6: Vivado (with Spartan-6 plugin) or ISE 14.7
Spartan-3E: ISE only (up to version 14.7)
Conclusion
For most modern applications, the Spartan-6 XC6SLX9 is the better choice due to its more advanced architecture, better power efficiency, and modern interfaces. However, the Spartan-3E board offers more DSP resources and I/Os for specialized applications and is often a more cost-effective option for simple projects.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from ampheo directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
