Which FPGA is Better Spartan 6 FPGA Development Board – xc6slx9-tqg144 or xc3s500e?

ampheoampheo
2 min read

Technical Specifications Comparison

FeatureXC6SLX9-TQG144 (Spartan-6)XC3S500E (Spartan-3E)
FPGA FamilySpartan-6 (45nm)Spartan-3E (90nm)
Logic Cells9,1525,292
Slices1,430931
Block RAM (kb)576360
DSP Slices1620
Max User I/Os102172
Clock Management4 DCMs + 2 PLLs4 DCMs
Memory ControllerMCB (DDR2/3)None
Power ConsumptionLower (~30% less)Higher
Supported I/O StandardsMore (including LVDS)Fewer

Key Differences

1. Architecture & Performance

  • Spartan-6 (XC6SLX9):

    • More modern 45nm technology

    • Higher logic density (more functionality per chip)

    • Better clock structure with PLLs

    • Supports DDR2/3 memory (MCB)

  • Spartan-3E (XC3S500E):

    • Older 90nm technology

    • More DSP blocks (for signal processing)

    • More I/O pins (172 vs. 102)

2. Development & Support

  • Spartan-6:

    • Still supported by Xilinx (though not recommended for new designs)

    • Compatible with modern Vivado tools (with limitations)

  • Spartan-3E:

    • Legacy product (requires ISE tools)

    • Limited support

3. Application Areas

  • XC6SLX9 is better for:

    • Projects requiring DDR memory

    • Low-power applications

    • Designs with complex clock management

    • Prototyping for more modern FPGAs

  • XC3S500E is better for:

    • Signal processing tasks (more DSP resources)

    • Projects requiring numerous I/Os

    • Simple learning projects (simpler architecture)

    • Cost-sensitive applications

Recommendation

Choose the Spartan-6 XC6SLX9 board if:

  • You need modern features like DDR memory controllers

  • Low-power design is important

  • You want to work with more current development tools

  • Future-oriented prototyping is needed

Choose the Spartan-3E XC3S500E board if:

  • You require extensive DSP operations

  • The higher number of I/O pins is critical

  • You can work with older ISE tools

  • Budget is a primary concern (often cheaper on the secondary market)

Development Tools

  • Spartan-6: Vivado (with Spartan-6 plugin) or ISE 14.7

  • Spartan-3E: ISE only (up to version 14.7)

Conclusion

For most modern applications, the Spartan-6 XC6SLX9 is the better choice due to its more advanced architecture, better power efficiency, and modern interfaces. However, the Spartan-3E board offers more DSP resources and I/Os for specialized applications and is often a more cost-effective option for simple projects.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from ampheo directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

ampheo
ampheo