DevOps vs. MLOps: Understanding the Key Differences

Table of contents
- 1. Team Composition
- 2. Development Process: Linear vs. Iterative
- 3. Versioning: Code-Only vs. Code + Data + Features
- 4. Build Time and Hardware Requirements
- 5. Automation of Training Runs
- 6. Continuous Integration (CI)
- 7. Continuous Deployment (CD)
- 8. Monitoring Intensity
- 9. Continuous Training (CT)
- Conclusion

There’s no doubt that DevOps has been the inspiration behind MLOps.
MLOps inherits many of the principles and practices from DevOps, aiming to streamline development and deployment processes for machine learning applications, much like DevOps has done for software engineering.
By observing how rapidly software is built and deployed using DevOps, the machine learning community — which was struggling with deployment complexity — began to adopt DevOps methodologies.
However, while MLOps is fundamentally built on DevOps principles, it introduces additional complexity due to the nature of ML workflows.
Let’s dive into a detailed comparison of DevOps vs. MLOps, understanding where they align and, more importantly, where they differ.
1. Team Composition
In DevOps, teams are usually composed of:
- DevOps engineers
On the other hand, MLOps requires a more diverse team, including:
Data scientists
ML engineers
Data engineers
DevOps engineers
This diversity reflects the broader skill sets needed to manage the complexities of data pipelines, model training, and deployment in MLOps environments.
2. Development Process: Linear vs. Iterative
DevOps development tends to be linear:
- Once code is written and integrated, it usually moves straightforwardly to deployment.
In contrast, MLOps development is iterative and experimental:
Data scientists constantly experiment with new data, features, models, and hyperparameters.
Achieving maximum prediction accuracy involves complex feedback loops and multiple iterations.
3. Versioning: Code-Only vs. Code + Data + Features
In DevOps:
Only the code needs to be versioned.
A change in code produces a new application.
In MLOps:
Multiple components need to be versioned:
Code
Data
Features
Different combinations of these produce different model outputs, making comprehensive versioning essential.
4. Build Time and Hardware Requirements
DevOps builds are generally:
Quick (minutes to an hour)
CPU-powered (not compute-intensive)
MLOps builds, especially for deep learning models, are:
Compute-intensive
Require GPUs for accelerated training
Can take hours to weeks for larger models
This hardware dependency significantly increases the complexity of ML build processes.
5. Automation of Training Runs
In DevOps:
- Automated builds are reasonable since build times are short.
In MLOps:
Automatic training for every code change isn’t practical due to long training times.
Teams implement staged builds and training runs to balance automation with practicality.
6. Continuous Integration (CI)
DevOps CI focuses on:
- Testing and validating code
MLOps CI extends further:
Testing and validating not just code but also data:
Ensuring data distribution is appropriate
Detecting skewed data or outliers
Checking for null values
Data validation is crucial because poor-quality data directly impacts model performance.
7. Continuous Deployment (CD)
In DevOps:
- CD involves deploying a build package or service to a web server or API endpoint.
In MLOps:
CD means deploying an entire continuous training pipeline:
On trigger, the pipeline retrains and redeploys the model automatically.
This adds significant complexity, requiring automation of steps that were traditionally manual.
8. Monitoring Intensity
DevOps monitoring typically includes:
Throughput
Latency
CPU utilization
System uptime
MLOps monitoring is far more intense, covering:
Model accuracy
Data drift
Feature monitoring
Latency and system metrics
Ethical and regulatory compliance (e.g., bias detection)
MLOps demands vigilance to ensure:
Models do not become biased (gender, race, etc.)
Compliance with government audits, especially in sensitive industries like pharmaceuticals and finance
Failing to monitor these aspects can result in:
Financial loss
Loss of trust and reputation
Legal consequences
In DevOps, software applications behave exactly as coded, making risks lower and more predictable.
In contrast, ML models are influenced by external factors like:
Evolving data patterns
Changes in customer behavior
This unpredictability makes MLOps inherently riskier and requires heightened monitoring.
9. Continuous Training (CT)
DevOps focuses on:
- Continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD)
MLOps introduces an additional critical layer:
- Continuous training (CT)
Why?
Models degrade over time due to changing data profiles.
Even if rare, models can begin behaving abnormally right after deployment.
New data patterns gradually reduce model performance.
To address this, MLOps integrates:
Scheduled retraining
On-demand retraining
Trigger-based retraining (e.g., when new data arrives)
By continuously training models, MLOps ensures that models remain relevant and accurate, adapting to the latest data dynamics.
Conclusion
In summary, while MLOps is deeply inspired by DevOps, it extends its principles to meet the specific needs of machine learning systems.
MLOps isn’t just about delivering models to production — it’s about delivering trustworthy, adaptive, and compliant machine learning systems that evolve with data over time.
As organizations embrace MLOps, they gain the ability to deploy models faster, monitor them effectively, and retrain them continuously, keeping pace with the dynamic nature of real-world data.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Harshit Sahu directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Harshit Sahu
Harshit Sahu
Enthusiastic about DevOps tools like Docker, Kubernetes, Maven, Nagios, Chef, and Ansible and currently learning and gaining experience by doing some hands-on projects on these tools. Also, started learning about AWS and GCP (Cloud Computing Platforms).