Micro Frontend Architecture: Breaking the Frontend Monolith

Hari SHari S
3 min read

In the backend world, microservices revolutionized how we build and scale systems. But what about the frontend? With apps growing into massive single-page applications (SPAs), the need to break the frontend monolith has never been more critical.

That’s where Micro Frontends (MFEs) come in.

In this blog, we’ll explore what micro frontends are, why they matter, and how you can build them using React, TypeScript, and Node.js.


💡 What Are Micro Frontends?

Micro Frontends is an architectural style where a frontend app is decomposed into individual, semi-independent “micro apps” that can be developed, tested, and deployed independently.

Think of it as microservices for the UI.

Each team can own a feature end-to-end—from the backend to the UI—without stepping on each other's toes.


🧩 Why Micro Frontends?

Here’s why teams adopt micro frontends:

  • Independent Deployments: No more waiting on other teams to release.

  • Tech Agnosticism: Use different frameworks or versions if needed.

  • Scalability: Easy to scale teams and codebases.

  • Faster Development: Smaller codebases mean faster builds and better focus.


🛠️ Common Micro Frontend Approaches

  1. Iframe-based (Old School)
    Easy to implement but comes with performance and UX tradeoffs.

  2. Build-Time Integration
    Shared libraries or pre-built bundles. Works well but tightly coupled.

  3. Runtime Integration (Module Federation) — ✅ Recommended
    Leverages Webpack 5’s Module Federation to load remote components dynamically at runtime.


🧪 Real-World Setup with React + TypeScript + Webpack Module Federation

Let’s imagine we’re building a shopping platform:

  • container (Shell App)

  • product (Micro Frontend App)

  • cart (Micro Frontend App)

Each is a standalone React + TypeScript project.

📦 Step 1: Module Federation Config

In product/webpack.config.js:

tsCopyEditnew ModuleFederationPlugin({
  name: 'product',
  filename: 'remoteEntry.js',
  exposes: {
    './ProductList': './src/components/ProductList',
  },
  shared: ['react', 'react-dom'],
});

In container/webpack.config.js:

tsCopyEditnew ModuleFederationPlugin({
  remotes: {
    product: 'product@http://localhost:3001/remoteEntry.js',
  },
});

🧬 Step 2: Load Remote Component

In container/src/App.tsx:

tsxCopyEditconst ProductList = React.lazy(() => import('product/ProductList'));

export const App = () => (
  <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
    <ProductList />
  </Suspense>
);

🔒 Common Challenges

  • Version Mismatches: Shared libraries must be carefully managed.

  • Authentication: Each MFE needs consistent auth handling.

  • Routing Conflicts: Consider a unified router or namespacing.


🌐 Deployment Strategies

  • Single Repo (Monorepo): Easier coordination, shared tooling.

  • Multi Repo: Full team independence, but needs good CI/CD setup.

Tip: Tools like Nx, Turborepo, or Lerna can simplify monorepo management.


✅ When to Use Micro Frontends

Good Fit:

  • Large-scale applications with multiple teams.

  • Need for independent deployments.

  • Long-term scalability concerns.

Not Ideal:

  • Small or medium apps.

  • Teams not mature in DevOps or modular design.


🧠 Final Thoughts

Micro frontends aren’t a silver bullet, but when done right, they unlock real scalability and independence for frontend teams. Combined with the power of React, TypeScript, and Node.js, you can build resilient, modern apps that scale with your team and business.


💬 Have you implemented micro frontends in your projects? What challenges or benefits did you see? Share your thoughts below!

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Hari S directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Hari S
Hari S