As Large Language Model (LLM) applications and sophisticated agentic AI systems become more prevalent, they introduce unique and complex security challenges that traditional threat modeling methodologies may not fully address [2][3][4]. These systems, characterized by their autonomy, learning capabilities, and intricate interactions, necessitate a specialized approach to identify and mitigate potential risks [3][4][9].

Understanding MAESTRO: A Framework for Agentic AI Security

MAESTRO, which stands for Multi-Agent Environment, Security, Threat, Risk, and Outcome, is a novel threat modeling framework specifically designed for the unique challenges posed by agentic AI [2][4][7][11]. Developed by Ken Huang, MAESTRO aims to fill the gaps left by existing frameworks when dealing with the complexities of AI agents, such as their autonomous decision-making, machine learning-specific vulnerabilities, and interaction-based risks [2][4].

Core Principles of MAESTRO MAESTRO is built upon several key principles to provide a comprehensive security analysis:

Extending Existing Frameworks: It builds upon established security frameworks like STRIDE, PASTA, and LINDDUN, augmenting them with AI-specific considerations [2][3][6].
Layered Security: It emphasizes that security is not a single component but must be integrated into every layer of an agentic AI's architecture [2][3][6].
Focus on AI-Specific Threats: The framework directly addresses threats unique to AI, including adversarial machine learning and risks associated with autonomous operations [2][3][6].
Risk-Based Approach: MAESTRO advocates for prioritizing threats based on their likelihood and potential impact within the specific context of the agent [2][3][6].
Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation: It highlights the necessity for ongoing monitoring, threat intelligence gathering, and model updates to address the evolving nature of AI and its associated threats [2][3][6].
Multi-Agent and Environment Focus: The framework explicitly considers the interactions between multiple AI agents and their operational environment [2].

The Seven Layers of MAESTRO

A fundamental aspect of MAESTRO is its seven-layer reference architecture for agentic AI, which allows for a granular analysis of potential vulnerabilities [3][4][6].

Foundation Models: This layer includes the core AI models, such as LLMs, that power the agents [3][6]. Threats at this layer can include backdoor attacks, data poisoning, and adversarial examples like malicious prompts [4].
Data Operations: This encompasses all data utilized by the agents, including its storage, processing, and the use of vector embeddings [3][6].
Agent Frameworks: This layer consists of the software frameworks and APIs that facilitate the creation and interaction of agents [3][6].
Deployment and Infrastructure: This refers to the underlying hardware and software infrastructure, such as servers, networks, and containers, that host the agents and APIs [3][6].
Evaluation and Observability: These are the systems and processes used to monitor, assess, and debug the behavior of AI agents [3][6].
Security and Compliance: This layer involves the security controls, policies, and compliance measures designed to protect the entire AI system [3][6].
Agent Ecosystem: This considers the broader environment in which multiple agents interact, including potential collaborations, marketplaces, and conflicts between agents [3][6].

Applying MAESTRO: A Step-by-Step Threat Modeling Process

MAESTRO provides a structured, step-by-step approach to proactively identify, assess, and mitigate risks across the AI lifecycle [2].

System Decomposition: Break down the AI system into its core components, aligning them with MAESTRO's seven-layer architecture. Define the capabilities, goals, and interaction patterns of the agents involved [2].
Layer-Specific Threat Modeling: Utilize layer-specific threat landscapes to identify potential threats relevant to each component of your system [2].
Cross-Layer Threat Identification: Analyze the interactions between different layers to uncover threats that may arise from vulnerabilities in one layer impacting others [2][3].
Risk Assessment: Evaluate the likelihood and potential impact of each identified threat. Prioritize these threats based on the risk assessment to focus mitigation efforts [2].
Mitigation Planning: Develop a comprehensive plan to address the prioritized threats. This includes defining specific mitigation strategies for layer-specific, cross-layer, and AI-specific threats [2].
Implementation and Monitoring: Implement the planned mitigation measures. Establish continuous monitoring processes to detect new threats and update the threat model as the system evolves [2].

Enhancing MAESTRO with MITRE ATLAS

While MAESTRO provides a robust methodology, it can be further enhanced by integrating resources like MITRE ATLAS. MITRE ATLAS is a knowledge base of adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) specifically focused on AI systems, modeled after the well-known MITRE ATT&CK framework [1][4]. ATLAS itself is not a detailed threat modeling methodology but serves as a valuable resource to enrich processes like those defined in MAESTRO [1]. MAESTRO offers a more holistic approach for agentic AI threat modeling by considering emergent behaviors and cross-layer threats, areas where ATLAS is still evolving [1].

An integrated approach can leverage the strengths of both [1]:

System Decomposition: Use MAESTRO's seven-layer model to define the AI system's architecture and agentic properties [1].
Threat Identification: Employ MITRE ATLAS to identify known AI-specific adversarial tactics and techniques. Simultaneously, use MAESTRO to highlight vulnerabilities and risks inherent to agentic systems and their interactions [1].
Layer-Specific & Cross-Layer Analysis: Leverage ATLAS to document known AI adversarial tactics within each layer. Apply MAESTRO's perspective to uncover vulnerabilities arising from agentic behavior and complex cross-layer interactions [1].
Risk Assessment & Mitigation Planning: Utilize MAESTRO’s risk management framework to assess and prioritize identified threats. Develop mitigation strategies informed by the specific threats detailed in ATLAS and the systemic vulnerabilities identified by MAESTRO [1].
Implementation, Monitoring, and Continuous Improvement: Implement defenses and establish continuous monitoring. This ensures that security measures are constantly refined to protect against both traditional and evolving AI-specific threats [1].

MAESTRO in Action: Illustrative Threats and Mitigations

To illustrate MAESTRO's application, consider these examples, some of which are adapted from analyses of systems like Google's A2A protocol [6]:

Layer 1: Foundation Models

Threat: Message Generation Attacks (Evasion): An attacker crafts malicious input causing the agent's model to generate harmful, biased, or incorrect messages, bypassing safety mechanisms [6].
- Mitigation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization. Verify output content for harmful material or unexpected behavior. Employ robust prompt design and consider techniques like ensemble methods or adversarial training to improve resilience [6].
Threat: Model Extraction: An attacker uses excessive or crafted interactions with an agent to infer details about a proprietary model's behavior or parameters, potentially leading to model theft [6].
- Mitigation: Enforce strict rate limits on interactions. Implement anomaly detection to identify probing or data extraction attempts [6].

Layer 7: Agent Ecosystem

Threat: Malicious Agent Interaction: A compromised agent interacts with other agents in the ecosystem to cause harm, exploit vulnerabilities, or trigger unintended consequences. The dynamic nature of agent identities can make these threats hard to predict [6][9].
- Mitigation: Use secure communication protocols and strong authentication mechanisms for inter-agent interactions. Implement agent reputation systems to track behavior and identify potentially malicious agents. Utilize sandboxing to isolate agents and limit the impact of a compromise, alongside runtime monitoring and policy enforcement [6].

Cross-Layer Threats

Example (Agent Frameworks -> Data Operations): An attacker injects malicious code into a message via the agent framework (Layer 3). This could cause an autonomous agent, due to non-deterministic decision-making, to bypass safety checks and access or exfiltrate sensitive data (Layer 2) [6].
Example (Security & Compliance -> Agent Frameworks): An attacker obtains unauthorized agent credentials (Layer 6) and uses them to send malicious commands or messages via the agent framework (Layer 3) [6].

Conclusion

The MAESTRO framework offers a vital, structured approach to navigating the complex security landscape of LLM applications and agentic AI systems [2][11]. By providing a layered perspective, focusing on AI-specific risks, and encouraging continuous adaptation, MAESTRO empowers security engineers, AI researchers, and developers to build more robust, secure, and trustworthy AI [2]. Integrating MAESTRO with knowledge bases like MITRE ATLAS can further enhance threat identification and mitigation strategies [1]. As AI continues to evolve, adopting and contributing to such comprehensive threat modeling frameworks will be crucial for responsible innovation and deployment [1].

Sources [1] Integrating MAESTRO with MITRE ATLAS https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wh2w-XO1iZc9HMy35oftLH_4Dw8DPnuc5Co-Zk4_-M8/mobilebasic [2] Agentic AI Threat Modeling Framework: MAESTRO | CSA https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/blog/2025/02/06/agentic-ai-threat-modeling-framework-maestro [3] Threat Modeling OpenAI's Responses API with MAESTRO | CSA https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/blog/2025/03/24/threat-modeling-openai-s-responses-api-with-the-maestro-framework [4] Orchestrating Agentic AI Securely - by Chris Hughes - Resilient Cyber https://www.resilientcyber.io/p/orchestrating-agentic-ai-securely [5] Threat modeling for agentic systems - The SAS Data Science Blog https://blogs.sas.com/content/subconsciousmusings/2025/04/24/threat-modeling-for-agentic-systems/ [6] Threat Modeling Google's A2A Protocol with the MAESTRO ... https://kenhuangus.substack.com/p/threat-modeling-googles-a2a-protocol [7] Agentic AI Threat Modeling Framework: MAESTRO | CSA | Jonathan ... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jonathangiglio_agentic-ai-threat-modeling-framework-maestro-activity-7301211059032391681-JW6D [8] Google Docs https://docs.google.com/?pli=1 [9] Layering Up Against MAS Security Threats | CISO Insights https://podcast.cisomarketplace.com/e/the-maestro-framework-layering-up-against-mas-security-threats/ [10] MAESTRO framework Posts - SAS Blogs https://blogs.sas.com/content/tag/maestro-framework/ [11] Agentic AI Threat Modeling Framework: MAESTRO https://www.thesecurityblogger.com/agentic-ai-threat-modeling-framework-maestro/ [12] Agentic AI Threat Modeling Framework: MAESTRO | CSA - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/johnwbarkerii_agentic-ai-threat-modeling-framework-maestro-activity-7297637244335489024-m-Sy [13] Steve Turner's Post - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/beingageek_maestro-frameworks-threatmodeling-activity-7328039419209216003-tfgq [14] Multi-Agentic system Threat Modeling Guide v1.0 - owasp ai https://genai.owasp.org/resource/multi-agentic-system-threat-modeling-guide-v1-0/

AI Agent Threat Surface Reduction: Approach to Proactive Enterprise Risk Management

Table of contents