DAMA - SAP MDG: Concept #9

❗️The Problem
People treat master data like a tech object:
“It’s in MARA.”
“That’s a vendor from LFA1.”
“Customer number 10000217 is fine.”
But no one agrees which system is the source.
No one knows who updated it.
And every report gives different numbers.
Why?
Because master data was treated like IT housekeeping — not a strategic asset.
🧠 What DAMA Actually Means by “Master & Reference Data”
Master Data = the key “nouns” of your business
(Customer, Product, Supplier, Employee...)Reference Data = controlled vocabularies used across the org
(Country codes, Payment terms, Product categories...)
But DAMA goes deeper:
It says this is the data that everything else depends on.
It must be:
Shared
Stable
Governed
Clear
Trusted
If transactional data is the bloodstream —
master data is the identity.
Key Concepts in DAMA
Concept | What It Means |
Golden Record | The single, trusted version of a business object |
Data Domains | Logical groupings like “Customer”, “Product”, “Location” |
Harmonization | Making the same object consistent across systems |
Consolidation | Merging duplicates, resolving conflicts |
Distribution | Sending master data where it’s needed — reliably and timely |
🔧 In SAP MDG: This Is the Core
SAP MDG exists exactly to operationalize DAMA’s vision for master data.
DAMA Term | SAP MDG Component |
Golden Record | Staging + Approval Process + Replication |
Data Domains | BP, Material, Supplier, Custom Objects |
Harmonization | Flex modeling, validations, value mapping |
Consolidation | Match/Merge tools, Duplicate Check, KMC |
Distribution | SOA/ALE/SLT Replication to target systems |
But SAP doesn’t give you the strategy — only the tools.
You need to define:
What is a “trusted record”?
Who maintains it?
What systems depend on it?
What happens if it changes?
⚠️ What Goes Wrong
Every system has its own version of “the customer”
Material created by copy-paste from old ones
Suppliers exist 6 times under slightly different names
Analytics show fake precision with dirty core data
And the worst part:
The business doesn’t trust the data. So they work outside the system.
🧠 Questions That Drive Master Data Clarity
What are our critical data domains?
Do we have a golden source — or just systems that shout the loudest?
Are our reference values consistent across systems and countries?
Can we trace who changed a master record — and why?
If not, you’re not doing MDM. You’re just syncing noise.
💬 Bottom Line
Master data is not about centralizing tables.
It’s about creating one version of the truth — and making sure everyone uses it.
Without it, no workflow, report, or AI can be trusted.
With it, you build a business that runs on clarity.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Dzmitryi Kharlanau directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Dzmitryi Kharlanau
Dzmitryi Kharlanau
SAP Logistics Consultant with 10+ years of experience in SAP SD, SAP MM, SAP LE, and SAP IS-Automotive. Skilled in SAP system support, integration, and process improvements. Achievements ✔️ Delivered custom logistics solutions, overseeing the entire process from concept to go-live. ✔️ Achieved SLA compliance in JIT environments, managing tasks from requirements to release independently. ✔️ Resolved complex issues swiftly, minimizing downtime and optimizing efficiency. Interests: Motivated to work with 🔧 S/4HANA SD, MM, BTP, and ABAP, taking responsibility for end-to-end solutions.