Nail the R in RAG: Retrieval Tactics That Slash AI Hallucinations

Your chatbot just invented a compliance clause.

That midnight alert from Legal sent one poor ML Engineer racing to his laptop. Two minutes later, he found the culprit: a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) prototype that had hallucinated a non-existent regulation and emailed 4,000 customers. Fixing the mess took 30 engineer-hours, and one panicked board call. The LLM itself was fine; the retrieval layer was the weak link.

The Stakes

Generative AI now tops 2025 tech budgets, with 45% of global IT leaders naming it their No. 1 investment [1]. Each hallucination chips away at that spend (and at your bonus). Gartner pegs poor data quality at £10 million+ in annual losses per firm [2]. Meanwhile, Google's latest study shows smart retrieval tweaks can cut hallucinations by 2–10% [3]. Ignore the “R”, and you’re literally burning budget and trust.

5 - Techniques to Weaponise Retrieval

A common misconception is that larger LLMs can compensate for poor retrieval. In reality, larger models may amplify errors if the retrieved context is flawed. Similarly, relying solely on vector search is insufficient; it often misses temporal shifts, graphs, and feedback loops. Modern retrieval requires a multi-faceted approach.

To enhance the retrieval component of your RAG system, consider the following strategies:

1. Calibrate First Response (Corrective RAG)

Mini Story: A fast-growing health-tech startup kept failing MDR audits because its symptom-checker bot offered off-label advice. The team wired in a self-critique “second opinion” loop that let the model grade its own draft answers and pull extra clinical notes when confidence dipped. False-positive recommendations fell 22 % in seven days and the compliance officer finally slept through the night.

Playbook:

• Implement a feedback loop: After generating an initial response, have the system assess its own output for accuracy and completeness.

• Incorporate a critic model: Use a secondary model to evaluate the initial response and suggest improvements or additional information retrieval.

• Reinforce learning: Fine-tune the model based on accepted versus rejected answers to enhance future performance.

2. Fuse & Map Context (Fusion RAG)

Mini Story: A large refurb-electronics marketplace was haemorrhaging returns; agents kept quoting obsolete specs from single-source manuals. Engineers fused manuals, customer reviews, and warranty clauses into one retrieval call, then reranked for diversity. Out-of-date answers dropped from 31 % to 7 %, slashing RMA costs by £180 k in Q1.

Playbook:

• Aggregate diverse sources: Combine data from various formats and repositories to create a rich information base.

• Apply reciprocal rank fusion: Merge multiple retrieval rankings to prioritize the most relevant documents.

• Visualize relationships: Use knowledge graphs to illustrate connections between entities, aiding both human understanding and machine processing.

3. Self-Serve Retrieval (Self-RAG)

Mini Story: A global news network saw its AI anchor misreport stock splits because weekend uploads lagged. They gave the model “fetch-on-demand” powers plus a publication-date filter that only surfaced items fresher than two hours. Result: headline accuracy jumped 15 pts and editors killed the nightly manual patch-up shift.

Playbook:

• Enable on-demand retrieval: Allow the system to identify when additional information is needed and fetch it dynamically.

• Incorporate temporal awareness: Assign timestamps to data and prioritize recent information for time-sensitive queries.

• Implement caching strategies: Use time-to-live (TTL) settings to balance data freshness with retrieval efficiency.

4. Temporal RAG

Mini Story: During a volatile earnings season, a global hedge fund found its market-making bot was quoting prices based on yesterday’s filings. Engineers bolted on a temporal RAG layer that re-indexed SEC releases every 15 minutes and weighted snippets by freshness; bad quotes plunged 18 % and the desk added £2.3 m in P&L that quarter.

Playbook:

• Timestamp embeddings: Assign temporal metadata to documents to facilitate time-aware retrieval.

• Temporal reranking: Prioritize documents based on their relevance and recency.

• Time-aware indexing: Use specialized indexes that account for the temporal dimension of data.

5. Graph RAG

Mini Story: A legal-tech scale-up kept losing prospects when its contract-review bot missed precedent links that junior associates could spot in seconds. Engineers overlaid a Graph RAG layer: every new case, statute, and clause became a node in a knowledge graph, with edges capturing “cites,” “overrules,” and “amends.”

Playbook:

• Construct knowledge graphs: Develop structured representations of entities and their interrelations.

• Integrate with retrieval systems: Use the knowledge graph to inform and enhance the retrieval process.

• Leverage graph traversal: Employ algorithms to navigate the graph and identify the most relevant information paths.

Action Plan

Before implementing these strategies, conduct an audit of your current system:

• Review recent outputs: Identify instances of inaccuracies or hallucinations.

• Assess retrieval effectiveness: Determine if the retrieved documents adequately support the generated responses.

• Identify gaps: Look for missing or outdated information that could be addressed with improved retrieval techniques.(Medium)

By focusing on enhancing the retrieval component of your RAG system, you can significantly reduce hallucinations, improve response accuracy, and build greater trust in your AI applications.

What would one hallucination cost your brand during the next audit? Book a free RAG Retrieval Health-Check or join our newsletter to stay ahead.

References

[1] AWS Generative AI Adoption Index 2025.

[2] Gartner Data Quality Research 2020.

[3] Google “Sufficient Context” Paper 2024.