What is used to provide IoT sensors with access to the network?


In IoT (Internet of Things) systems, sensors are connected to a network using various hardware and communication technologies, depending on the use case, power requirements, and range. Here are the most common methods used to provide IoT sensors with network access:
1. Wireless Connectivity (Most Common for IoT Sensors)
A. Short-Range Wireless (Local Network Access)
Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11)
Used for high-bandwidth, power-hungry applications (e.g., smart cameras, home automation).
Example: ESP8266/ESP32 modules.
Pros: Fast, direct internet access.
Cons: High power consumption, requires a Wi-Fi network.
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE, Bluetooth 4.0+)
Used for low-power, short-range sensor networks (e.g., wearables, beacons).
Example: Nordic nRF52, Raspberry Pi with BLE.
Pros: Low power, smartphone-compatible.
Cons: Limited range (~10-100m).
Zigbee (IEEE 802.15.4)
Mesh networking for smart homes/industrial IoT (e.g., Philips Hue, Xiaomi sensors).
Example: CC2530, XBee modules.
Pros: Low power, mesh support.
Cons: Requires a Zigbee hub.
Z-Wave
Similar to Zigbee but proprietary (used in home automation).
Pros: Interoperable, low interference.
Cons: Slower than Zigbee, licensed tech.
Thread (IPv6-based, 802.15.4)
Emerging standard (Google Nest, Apple HomeKit).
Pros: Secure, self-healing mesh.
B. Long-Range Wireless (Wide-Area Network Access)
LoRaWAN
Long-range, low-power (up to 10km in rural areas).
Used in smart agriculture, city sensors.
Example: RAKwireless LoRa modules.
Pros: Ultra-low power, long range.
Cons: Low bandwidth (~300 bps to 50 kbps).
NB-IoT (Narrowband IoT)
Cellular-based, low-power wide-area network (LPWAN).
Example: SIMCom NB-IoT modules.
Pros: Works on existing cellular networks.
Cons: Requires a SIM card, subscription fees.
LTE-M (LTE for Machines)
Faster than NB-IoT, better for mobile IoT (e.g., asset tracking).
Example: Quectel BG96.
Sigfox
Ultra-narrowband, global IoT network.
Pros: Low cost, long battery life.
Cons: Limited data (12-byte messages).
2. Wired Connectivity (For Stable, High-Reliability Networks)
Ethernet (PoE for Power + Data)
Used in industrial IoT (e.g., factory sensors, security cameras).
Pros: Reliable, high bandwidth.
Cons: Requires cabling.
RS-485 / Modbus
- Industrial sensor networks (long-distance wired communication).
Power Line Communication (PLC)
- Sends data over existing power lines.
3. Gateway Devices (For Hybrid Networks)
Many IoT sensors (e.g., Zigbee/LoRa) don’t connect directly to the internet but use a gateway to bridge to Wi-Fi/cellular.
Example:
Raspberry Pi as a LoRaWAN gateway
Amazon Echo (Zigbee hub)
Industrial IoT gateways (e.g., Siemens, Advantech)
4. Cloud & Edge Computing
Sensors send data to:
Cloud (AWS IoT, Google Cloud IoT, Azure IoT Hub) – For storage/analytics.
Edge devices (NVIDIA Jetson, Raspberry Pi) – For local processing before sending.
Which One Should You Use?
Use Case | Best Choice |
Smart home sensors | Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi |
Industrial monitoring | Ethernet, RS-485, LoRa |
Wearables/health tracking | BLE |
Large-scale agriculture | LoRaWAN, NB-IoT |
Battery-powered remote sensors | LoRa, NB-IoT, Sigfox |
Conclusion
IoT sensors connect to networks via Wi-Fi, BLE, Zigbee, LoRa, cellular (NB-IoT/LTE-M), or wired (Ethernet/RS-485). The choice depends on range, power, bandwidth, and cost. Many systems also use gateways to bridge different protocols to the internet.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from ampheo directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
