Building Agent Momo: My Journey Creating an AI Coding Agent - Mini Cursor CLI Project

The Vision
You know that feeling when you've got this awesome app idea buzzing in your head? Imagine telling it to an AI and then just... watching. No copy-pasting code snippets, no manual file creation, no switching between tools. Just pure autonomous development from idea to execution.
That's exactly what I set out to build with Agent Momo - an agentic AI system specialized in web development who handles everything, from that first spark of an idea all the way to launching the finished product.
What Makes Agent Momo Different?
Agent Momo is designed to be truly autonomous. It doesn't just generate code - it:
Plans project architecture and structure
Creates files and directories automatically
Writes production-ready code
Executes system commands and handles project setup
Debugs issues and optimizes code
Opens the final application for testing
The key difference? Agency. Agent Momo makes decisions, takes actions, and manages the entire development workflow without human intervention.
The Architecture: Building for Autonomy
Core Components:
Agent Momo is built on several key components that work together to enable autonomous operation:
# Available tools that Agent Momo can use
available_tools = {
"run_system_command": run_system_command,
"write_file": write_file,
"read_file": read_file,
"append_to_file": append_to_file,
"open_file": open_file,
}
Structured JSON Communication:
One of the most critical design decisions was implementing structured JSON responses. Every interaction with Agent Momo follows a predictable format:
{
"step": "action",
"function": "write_file",
"input": {
"filename": "todo-app/index.html",
"content": "<!DOCTYPE html>..."
},
"content": "Creating the main HTML structure for the TODO app."
}
This structure ensures reliable communication between the AI and the tool execution system, preventing the ambiguity that often plagues AI interactions.
Key Learnings: The Art of System Prompt
1. Specificity is Everything
My biggest learning was how crucial detailed system prompts are for autonomous systems. Generic prompts lead to generic, unreliable behavior. Here's what I discovered works:
❌ Vague Instruction:
"You are a coding assistant. Help users build web apps."
✅ Specific, Actionable Instruction:
"You are an advanced agentic AI, named Agent Momo, specialized in software development who helps users in building Web-Apps.
Your goal is to autonomously assist with end-to-end coding tasks, including code generation, debugging and optimization."
2. Explicit Tool Usage Guidelines
The AI needed explicit instructions on how and when to use each tool. I learned to include detailed examples in the system prompt:
{
"step": "action",
"function": "write_file",
"input": {"filename": "app.js", "content": "console.log('Hello');"},
"content": "Creating the main JavaScript file."
}
3. Error Handling Instructions
Perhaps most importantly, I had to teach Agent Momo how to interpret different types of responses and continue working even when encountering expected "errors" (like trying to create a directory that already exists).
The Challenges: What I Learned the Hard Way
Challenge 1: The Mysterious Exit Code 256
The Problem: Agent Momo would stop working whenever it encountered exit code 256 from system commands, treating it as a fatal error.
The Investigation: I discovered that exit code 256 from mkdir
commands simply means "directory already exists" - not an actual error that should halt execution.
The Solution: I refined both the tool implementation and system prompt:
def run_system_command(cmd: str):
try:
result = os.system(cmd)
if result == 0:
return f"✅ Command executed successfully"
elif "mkdir" in cmd and result == 256:
return f"ℹ️ Directory already exists - continuing..."
else:
return f"⚠️ Command executed with exit code {result}"
except Exception as e:
return f"❌ Command execution failed: {str(e)}"
Key Learning: Autonomous systems need nuanced error interpretation, not just binary success/failure logic.
Challenge 2: Inaccurate Model Responses
The Problem: The AI would sometimes provide malformed JSON, incorrect function parameters, or skip essential steps in the development process.
Root Causes I Identified:
Ambiguous instructions in the system prompt
Inconsistent examples
Missing validation for multi-parameter functions
Unclear success/failure criteria
The Solutions:
- Parameter Validation: I implemented robust input handling that could process both single parameters and complex objects:
# Handle different input types gracefully
if isinstance(tool_input, dict):
result = available_tools[tool](**tool_input)
elif isinstance(tool_input, str):
result = available_tools[tool](tool_input)
Explicit JSON Format Requirements: I added detailed format specifications to the system prompt with multiple examples.
Iterative Prompt Refinement: Through extensive testing, I refined the system prompt to be more explicit about expected behaviors.
Key Learning: AI reliability comes from precise instructions, comprehensive examples, and robust error handling - not just hoping the model "figures it out."
Challenge 3: Multi-Parameter Function Calls
The Problem: Functions like write_file(filename, content)
were failing because the AI was only passing one parameter.
The Root Cause: The system prompt didn't clearly specify how to handle functions requiring multiple parameters.
The Solution: I explicitly documented the required JSON structure:
IMPORTANT: For multi-parameter functions, use JSON objects:
{"filename": "path/to/file", "content": "your code here"}
The Exact Moment!!
1. The Magic of "Build me a TODO app"
The moment that truly sold me on Agent Momo's potential was incredibly simple. I typed:
"Build me a TODO app using HTML, CSS & JS"
What happened next was nothing short of magical. Within seconds, Agent Momo sprang into action:
🧠 Planning Phase: Agent Momo immediately analyzed the request and responded: "I'll create a TODO list app using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It will allow users to add, delete, and mark tasks as complete. Do you have any UI preferences (dark/light theme, minimal layout, animations, etc.)?"
💫 The Interactive Touch: This is where it got interesting. Agent Momo didn't just build a basic app - it asked for my preferences! When I mentioned I'd love some animations, it didn't miss a beat.
⚡ Lightning-Fast Execution: What followed was a blur of autonomous activity:
Created the project structure in milliseconds
Generated semantic HTML with proper accessibility attributes
Wrote beautiful CSS with smooth animations and transitions
Implemented JavaScript with add, delete, and complete functionality
Added delightful hover effects and task completion animations
Opened the finished application automatically
The entire process took less than 30 seconds.
2. Beyond Functional - It Was Beautiful
The TODO app Agent Momo created wasn't just functional - it was genuinely beautiful:
Smooth Animations: Tasks would slide in when added, fade out when deleted, and had a satisfying strikethrough animation when completed
Modern Design: Clean typography, proper spacing, and a color scheme that felt professional
Responsive Layout: Worked perfectly on both desktop and mobile
Micro-interactions: Buttons had hover states, inputs had focus animations, and the entire interface felt alive
The revelation: This wasn't just code generation - Agent Momo had design sensibilities.
3. True Conversational Development
The most impressive part wasn't the speed or even the quality - it was the conversation. Agent Momo asked questions like a real developer would:
"Do you want animations?" ✨
"Should I use a dark or light theme?"☀️/🌙
"Any specific features you'd like me to prioritize?" 🎯
When I said yes to animations, it didn't just add basic CSS transitions. It implemented:
Smooth task entry animations with easing functions
Hover effects that felt responsive and modern
Completion animations that provided satisfying user feedback
Loading states and micro-interactions throughout
Conclusion: The Dawn of Autonomous Development
Building Agent Momo taught me that we're on the cusp of a fundamental shift in how software gets built. The combination of advanced language models, structured communication protocols, and robust tool integration creates possibilities we're only beginning to explore.
The challenges I faced - from cryptic exit codes to inaccurate model responses - are solvable problems. With careful system design, iterative refinement, and a focus on autonomous decision-making, we can build AI systems that don't just assist with development but actively participate in it.
Key Takeaways:
System prompt engineering is an art that requires precision and iteration
Autonomous systems need nuanced error interpretation capabilities
Structured communication protocols are essential for reliability
The future of development is collaborative human-AI teams
Agent Momo is just the beginning. As these systems become more sophisticated, we'll see a new era of software development where ideas can be transformed into applications at the speed of thought!
Demo Video: Agent Momo in Action!
Github Repo:https://github.com/akshaybhushan26/Agent-Momo
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Akshay Bhushan directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
