Design Patterns for Data Pipelines

Mikaeel KhalidMikaeel Khalid
4 min read

In today’s data-driven landscape, building efficient, scalable, and reliable data pipelines is foundational to the success of any data engineering effort. Whether you're managing simple workflows or architecting enterprise-grade data systems, choosing the right pipeline design pattern is essential.

This article walks through key considerations and patterns in designing data pipelines, offering a practical perspective with real-world examples.

What Is a Data Pipeline?

A data pipeline refers to a structured sequence of processes that ingest, transform, and deliver data from source systems to target destinations. Each stage of the pipeline passes processed output to the next, forming a logical flow.

A typical pipeline involves:

  • Source: Where data originates (e.g., APIs, databases)

  • Processing: Where data is transformed (cleansing, enrichment, aggregation)

  • Destination: Where data is stored or consumed (e.g., data warehouse, analytics tools)

Depending on the architecture, pipelines can involve source-to-destination, destination-to-destination, or many-to-one configurations.

Understanding Data Pipeline Architectures

Logical vs. Platform Architecture

  • Logical Architecture focuses on the flow and transformation of data from ingestion to consumption.

  • Platform Architecture addresses the tooling, technologies, and frameworks that implement these processes (e.g., Spark, Kafka, BigQuery).

Key Pipeline Design Patterns

1. Batch Processing

Batch pipelines collect data over fixed intervals and process it in bulk. This traditional model remains viable for workloads that don't require real-time results.

  • Use Cases: Reporting dashboards, historical analysis

  • Technologies: Apache Spark, Logstash, Fluentd

  • Considerations: Cost-effective but not suitable for real-time insights

2. Stream Processing

Stream pipelines process data continuously as it arrives, enabling near real-time analytics and responsive systems.

  • Use Cases: Fraud detection, real-time personalization, IoT

  • Technologies: Kafka, Kinesis, Flink, Google Dataflow

  • Pattern: Often implemented via a pub/sub (publisher/subscriber) model

3. Lambda and Kappa Architectures

These hybrid approaches combine batch and streaming paradigms.

  • Lambda: Incorporates both batch and real-time layers; ideal for situations where raw data must be stored for future use.

  • Kappa: Streamlines the approach by using a single processing layer (typically streaming), simplifying the architecture.

ETL, ELT, and CDC Approaches

  • ETL (Extract, Transform, Load): Classic method where transformation occurs before data reaches the destination.

  • ELT (Extract, Load, Transform): Gaining popularity with modern data warehouses; transformation happens after loading.

  • CDC (Change Data Capture): Detects and responds to data changes in real time, often through message queues or streaming services.

Data virtualization is another strategy where logical views are created on top of existing datasets, improving flexibility and reducing storage overhead.

How to Choose the Right Pipeline Design

Selecting a pipeline pattern depends on several factors:

  • Volume: Can the system scale to handle large, concurrent events?

  • Velocity: Does the use case require real-time or near-real-time data?

  • Variety: Can the system handle structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data?

  • Cost: Is streaming necessary, or can a batch process suffice to optimize cost?

Example: Streaming might provide real-time insights, but batch ingestion is often free in many warehouse services like BigQuery. The trade-off between speed and cost must align with business needs.

Tooling Consideration:

There are services that can create and run both streaming and batch data pipelines, i.e. Google Dataflow. How is it different from any other pipeline built in the data warehouse solution? The choice would depend on existing infrastructure. For example, if you have some existing Hadoop workloads, then GCP DataFlow would be a wrong choice as it will not let you to re-use the code (it is using Apachec Beam). In this case you would want to use GCP Dataproc which works on Hadoop/Spark code.

💡
The rule of thumb is that if the processing is dependent on any tools in the Hadoop ecosystem, Dataproc should be utilized. It is basically a Hadoop extension service.

On the other hand, if you are not limited by existing code and would like to reliably process ever-increasing amounts of streaming data then Dataflow is the recommended choice.

💡
You can check these Dataflow templates if you like to do things in Java, Python or Go.

Conclusion

As organizations increasingly adopt data-centric strategies, data pipelines must evolve to support ever-growing demands in data volume, variety, and velocity. The right pipeline design pattern not only enhances operational efficiency but also supports real-time decision-making and long-term scalability.

Whether you're adopting a traditional ETL flow or implementing advanced stream processing, understanding the trade-offs and best-fit use cases is crucial for designing robust data architectures.

By carefully selecting your architecture and tools, you can future-proof your data infrastructure while meeting immediate analytical and operational goals.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Mikaeel Khalid directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Mikaeel Khalid
Mikaeel Khalid

I am a Software and Certified AWS & GCP Engineer, I am passionate about solving complex technical problems. My goal here is to help others by sharing my learning journey.