Introduction.

If you’re struggling to find a job right now, you’re not alone — and no, it’s not because you’re underqualified or unmotivated. The UK job market in 2025 is structurally constrained. We’re in a loose labour market: an oversupply of candidates relative to vacancies.

Roles attract hundreds of applications, yet conversion rates remain low. The underlying issue isn’t personal — it’s systemic. Economic pressure, automated screening, and distorted hiring practices have reshaped the landscape.

This article outlines the operational mechanics behind today’s broken job market, and why it continues to fail jobseekers.

The Worst Job Market Since 2007.

The UK is experiencing its weakest job market conditions since the 2007–08 global financial crisis. Macroeconomic instability — driven by COVID-19’s long tail effects, post-Brexit labour market shifts, geopolitical uncertainty, and sustained inflation — has created cautious hiring environments across most sectors. Organisations are maintaining lean staffing models, prioritising cost containment, and pushing back headcount expansion.

Redundancy levels have increased year-on-year. Vacancy volumes have dropped, particularly in mid-level and junior roles. Hiring cycles have extended significantly — candidates are enduring four- to six-stage processes, only to have positions frozen or rescoped at the last minute. This climate favours employers and places sustained pressure on candidates.

Degrees Have Become a Commoditised Credential.

Higher education in the UK has been increasingly commercialised. Universities operate on revenue-driven models, and entry standards have been relaxed to accommodate tuition-paying applicants — especially from overseas. This has resulted in credential inflation: degrees have become a minimum filter rather than a differentiator.

Scandals within Russell Group institutions have validated concerns about declining academic gatekeeping. For employers, a degree no longer guarantees competence or job readiness.

Consequently, experience — preferably commercial, technical, and recent — is now the primary qualifying metric for most roles.

Entry-Level Jobs That Aren’t Entry-Level.

The phrase “entry-level” has lost operational meaning. Job postings frequently list entry-level titles with mid-level prerequisites: 3–5 years of experience, specific tooling requirements, domain knowledge, and portfolio evidence. This is a direct result of organisations bypassing onboarding costs by recruiting pre-trained candidates.

The result is a barrier to entry for graduates, apprentices, and career switchers. Without prior access to the sector, these individuals remain excluded.

This contradicts the theoretical function of an entry-level role, which is to provide structured progression from learning to work.

Fake Postings, Unavailable Roles, and Recruitment Theatre.

Job boards are saturated with listings that are no longer live, never existed, or are being used to fulfil non-hiring objectives — such as internal audit requirements or shareholder optics. These practices contribute to false-positive application opportunities.

Third-party job boards profit from listing volume, not placement outcomes. As such, expired or already-filled roles are rarely removed unless employers manually intervene.

Candidates spend hours on personalised CVs and cover letters only to encounter unmonitored inboxes and black holes.

Additionally, some vacancies are advertised purely to meet legal obligations (e.g., showing external advertising before hiring internal staff). These roles are functionally closed but remain publicly visible, creating wasted applicant bandwidth.

Ghosting and the Absence of Closure.

Candidate ghosting has become widespread. It's now common for applicants to complete technical assessments, multiple interviews, or final-stage discussions — only to receive no outcome communication. The operational burden of candidate feedback has been deprioritised in many organisations, replaced by passive silence.

This not only degrades candidate experience but removes any opportunity for retrospective skill development or interview refinement.

Unpaid Technical Assessments = Exploited Labour.

Some companies issue structured assessment tasks that mimic commercial work — pitch documents, UX redesigns, content plans, or technical configurations. These are then utilised internally without compensation, and candidates are dismissed post-submission. While framed as “part of the hiring process,” this constitutes uncompensated labour and violates ethical hiring norms.

No feedback, no result, and no visibility into whether the work was discarded or absorbed into live projects.

Salary Opacity and Power Imbalance.

Compensation transparency remains weak. A high percentage of job ads exclude salary bands altogether. This asymmetry forces applicants to engage without knowing whether the role aligns with their financial requirements. In some cases, employers use applicant-supplied expectations to underbid, exploiting power imbalance.

Lack of published pay ranges undermines equity and prolongs interview pipelines that were mismatched from the outset.

CVs Filtered by Machines, Not People.

Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) are now the first and often only layer of screening for most large-scale employers. These systems filter submissions based on keyword density, formatting, chronology, and role-specific taxonomies. A well-qualified CV that lacks keyword alignment may be algorithmically rejected without human review.

This has created a new job-seeking discipline: AI-optimised CV writing. Candidates are advised to write for parsing engines, not people — favouring clarity, matching terminology, and structured formatting.

Labour Oversupply and Candidate Replaceability.

The job market in 2025 reflects a loose labour model — an excess supply of candidates relative to employer demand. In this model, workers are easily substitutable. Organisations are under minimal pressure to offer competitive pay, benefits, or retention strategies. Roles are backfilled rapidly, and employee exit costs are absorbed without escalation.

This economic structure disincentivises loyalty and long-term investment in employee development.

The Decline of Traditional Employment Models.

The conventional full-time, permanent, single-employer role is becoming less dominant. Instead, gig contracts, zero-hour agreements, and short-term freelance arrangements are increasingly common. Employers benefit from flexibility and cost savings, but the burden of stability and income forecasting now sits with the worker.

Even among salaried roles, tenure expectations have collapsed. Few workers now anticipate 10+ years with one organisation — not out of preference, but due to structural precarity.

Devaluation of Skills and Outdated Education.

Formal education, unless paired with hands-on experience, is frequently viewed as outdated or insufficient. The pace of technological change has outstripped curriculum updates. Skills like coding, cloud architecture, and cybersecurity need to be current and demonstrable to be valued.

This has contributed to a paradox: overqualified yet unemployable — on paper, a candidate may meet all formal criteria but fail to demonstrate immediate commercial utility.

What You Can Do:

Don’t Internalise Structural Failure.

If your peers are employed and you're not, it's not proof of incompetence. It's market timing, network advantage, or pure variance. Comparing job outcomes without accounting for sector volatility and access gaps is analytically flawed.

If you've been applying, refining, showing up, and still hearing nothing — the problem is not your commitment. It's the system's inefficiency. Job hunting is now a high-input, low-feedback process. That doesn't make you a failure.

You're not expected to spend 14 hours a day sending applications. Recovery and boundary-setting are part of sustainable career building.

Tailor CVs.

Generic CVs won’t work. You need to match the job description exactly — in wording, format, and sequencing. Use tools like Jobscan or CV Wizard to ensure ATS compatibility. Write for parsing, not for personality.

Focus on Demonstrable Output.

Degrees and credentials may no longer be enough. Build a portfolio, case studies, GitHub repos, or live demos — anything that shows direct, job-relevant capability. If you’re in tech, data, writing, or design, this is non-negotiable.

Network Laterally, Not Just Vertically.

This is one of my most effective recommendations that I can give you. Don’t wait for job postings! Reach out to professionals doing the job you want. Ask about their entry route, not just for referrals. Most hires still happen via networks, not public listings.

Use LinkedIn to search for people currently working in the role you’re aiming for. Apply a location filter — such as within 50 miles or specific counties — and identify which companies in your area employ people in that position. These organisations are likely to hire similar roles, so consider targeting them directly!

Final Word.

This labour market is structurally inefficient, overly automated, and heavily biased toward employers.

It isn’t personal. But it is difficult. The best thing you can do is adapt where necessary, protect your mental bandwidth, and avoid blaming yourself for outcomes shaped by a flawed system.

I really hope that you found this article worthwhile, and I wish you all the very best in your job search.

The UK Job Market Is Broken – Here’s What You’re Up Against in 2025.

Table of contents