Documentation: Building Systems That Explain Themselves

Documentation isn’t glamorous. It doesn’t ship to production, and no user ever asks for it directly. But try working with a system without it—suddenly, even the simplest tasks feel like deciphering a mystery novel written in a forgotten language. In modern engineering, good documentation is a quiet enabler of velocity, clarity, and trust.

---

Why Documentation Matters

In fast-moving teams, tribal knowledge often fills the gaps left by missing documentation. But as systems grow and teams scale or turn over, undocumented decisions become sources of confusion, inconsistency, and regressions. Documentation is how we make our systems inclusive—across roles, time zones, and future hires. It gives every team member, from developer to tester to auditor, a map they can trust.

In cloud-native systems, microservices, and cross-functional pipelines, documentation is a multiplier. It makes complex systems explorable. It makes architecture auditable. It makes onboarding humane.

---

What You’re Responsible For

Whether you’re writing backend code, designing APIs, or configuring CI/CD pipelines, your responsibility is to document with intent. That means:

• Explaining the why, not just the what.

• Keeping docs close to the source of truth (code, config, design).

• Using language and formats that your audience can act on—be it markdown in the repo, Swagger for APIs, or diagrams for flows.

Your standard isn’t perfection; it’s discoverability and clarity. If someone can find your work, understand it, and extend it without asking you, you’ve succeeded.

---

How to Approach It

In design: Start early with system diagrams and API contracts. Sketch flows and assumptions—even informally—to help others understand your thought process.

In development: Use inline comments sparingly but meaningfully. Keep README files up-to-date. Adopt standards like Javadoc or docstrings that tools can parse. If you’re writing APIs, auto-generate OpenAPI specs.

In testing and configuration: Document test data assumptions, edge cases, and setup steps. Add meaningful descriptions to feature toggles, environment variables, and infrastructure-as-code scripts. Let every setting tell a story.

And finally, review your documentation like you review code. Clarity is a feature, not fluff.

---

What This Leads To

• Smoother onboarding and handoffs.

• Fewer support queries and misunderstandings.

• Better alignment across development, operations, and compliance teams.

• More resilient systems, because decisions are captured, not forgotten.

When documentation is a habit, not a chore, systems become easier to evolve—and much harder to break.

---

How to Easily Remember the Core Idea

Think of documentation as your past self helping your future self. Or as your system leaving breadcrumbs for the next person in line. It's not about writing novels—it's about writing notes that matter.

---

How to Identify a System with Inferior Documentation

• No README or out-of-date instructions.

• Tribal knowledge is required to deploy or test.

• Comments like “TODO: document this.”

• Complex configurations with no context.

• Decisions that must be reverse-engineered from code or commits.

If people are afraid to touch parts of the system for fear of breaking something—they’re likely operating in a documentation vacuum.

---

What a System with Good Documentation Feels Like

You open the repo and know where to start. You can deploy a service without messaging three people. You understand how two services interact by looking at a single diagram. You see comments that don’t restate the code, but explain why something’s done a certain way. Everything feels intentional—and approachable.

---

Tooling and Documentation Types

Documentation isn’t a monolith. It’s a living collection of artifacts that serve different purposes at different times. Good systems don’t just work — they tell their own story clearly and consistently. That’s where tooling comes in.

Use tools that lower the barrier to writing and maintaining documentation. Markdown-based static site generators like Docusaurus, Hugo, or MkDocs work well for developer-facing docs. For diagrams, tools like Excalidraw, Lucidchart, or PlantUML help visualize flows and architecture decisions without needing a design degree.

Documentation takes many forms, and each has its role:

• API documentation explains how to use your service and what to expect — critical for integrations.

• Architecture diagrams clarify how pieces fit together, easing onboarding and troubleshooting.

• Changelogs and release notes highlight what’s new, what’s fixed, and what to watch out for — helping teams move with awareness.

• Readmes and contribution guides shape the experience of new collaborators, especially in open-source or multi-team setups.

It’s not about making one perfect doc — it’s about covering the right surfaces and updating them with care. Over-documentation that’s stale is often worse than brief documentation that’s up to date.

---

Documentation for External vs. Internal Audiences

Who you’re writing for changes what and how you write. Internal docs can afford to be more technical, candid, or even scrappy — especially when time is short. External docs, on the other hand, need polish, predictability, and clarity.

Internal documentation often includes:

• System setup instructions

• Engineering decision records

• Troubleshooting guides

• Incident postmortems

These serve your teammates — current and future — and should aim for honesty, accessibility, and institutional memory.

External documentation speaks to users, partners, auditors, or customers. It needs to:

• Set clear expectations

• Reflect brand tone and professionalism

• Cover edge cases and fallback behaviors

• Be version-aware and forward-compatible

When you blur the line between internal and external too much, you risk confusing both audiences. But if you document intentionally — with empathy and purpose — you create systems that communicate, even when no one's around to explain them.

---

Common Documentation Issues (and How to Gently Untangle Them)

Documentation rarely fails because someone didn’t care. It fails quietly — when updates are postponed, links rot, or no one can remember where the “real” source of truth lives. These issues compound over time and slowly erode confidence in the material.

Stale Documentation The most common pitfall is content that no longer reflects reality. A doc that says one thing while the code does another is worse than no doc at all — it breeds mistrust.

How to tackle it:

• Tie documentation updates to code changes in the workflow. If a major refactor lands, its doc should ride along.

• Use documentation linting or tooling that surfaces outdated files or unreferenced pages.

• Set up light-touch reviews (e.g., once a quarter) for foundational docs — not to overhaul, just to prune or affirm.

Searchability and Fragmentation Another familiar issue: the “where do I find it?” dilemma. Documentation scattered across Confluence, Google Docs, wikis, and random Notion pages becomes a maze with no map.

How to tackle it:

• Consolidate into one primary platform whenever possible.

• Invest in simple tagging or navigation structure — don’t let format be the barrier to discovery.

• Write with findability in mind: clear titles, summaries, and meaningful keywords help future readers (and search engines) locate answers faster.

Overly Technical or Unapproachable Writing Docs written only for senior engineers may unintentionally gatekeep. Meanwhile, oversimplified guides might miss the nuance that experienced contributors need.

How to tackle it:

• Layer your content. Start with a clear summary, then allow deeper dives for those who need them.

• Favor plain language where it fits — precision doesn’t have to mean complexity.

• Ask a peer from another team to walk through the doc as a “cold reader” and offer feedback.

Ultimately, the health of your documentation reflects the health of your culture. A good system doesn’t just produce knowledge — it shares it generously and keeps it fresh.

---

Documentation: The Backbone of Other Non-Functionals

Documentation doesn’t stand alone — it quietly powers many other non-functional qualities by making them visible, explainable, and repeatable. Without documentation, what we call resilience, adaptability, or compliance may simply be accidental — lucky until the day it isn’t.

Backup and Restore Having robust backups means nothing if no one knows how to restore from them. Documentation here isn’t just helpful — it’s the difference between recovery and panic. You need precise, step-by-step guides, tested ahead of time, stored somewhere accessible even if the main system is down.

Performance and Scalability You can’t optimize what you don’t understand. Documenting known bottlenecks, tuning parameters, or architecture decisions helps teams evolve systems without stepping on past mistakes. Performance tuning is often trial-and-error — let the next person pick up where you left off.

Compliance and Auditability Many compliance failures aren’t technical — they’re traceability failures. You didn’t store a log long enough, or no one knew the retention policy. Documenting data flows, processing rules, and access boundaries turns invisible requirements into actionable tasks.

Observability Instrumentation without guidance leads to dashboards no one trusts. It’s vital to document what metrics matter, what alerts mean, and how logs are structured. This empowers on-call engineers and avoids alert fatigue.

Data Retention When should data be archived, deleted, or anonymized? Who owns the decision? Clear documentation ensures these policies aren’t buried in emails or tribal memory but codified in a place where they can be revisited and revised as laws or systems evolve.

Adaptability and Onboarding One of the most underrated impacts of documentation is how it unlocks adaptability. When teams change, platforms migrate, or new engineers onboard, good docs create a smooth bridge rather than a jarring restart.

Even if the code is flawless, a missing or outdated document can bring a system to its knees — or stall your team at a critical juncture. Documenting these non-functional dimensions gives your system a memory. One that can be trusted, referenced, and improved over time.

---

Related Key Terms and NFRs

Related Key Terms and Concepts: API documentation, changelogs, architecture diagrams, onboarding guides, knowledge base, version control, markdown, DITA, doc-as-code, internal wiki, documentation tooling, semantic versioning, user manuals, READMEs, automated doc generation, searchable documentation, content governance, stale documentation, knowledge sharing, documentation lifecycle

Related NFRs: Maintainability, Observability, Compliance Readiness, Adaptability, Backup and Restore, Testability, Accessibility, Cost Awareness, Resilience, Scalability, Auditability

---

Final Thoughts

Documentation doesn’t just explain what the system does—it tells the story of how it’s meant to work, why it was built the way it was, and how to care for it moving forward. It’s easy to overlook the rush to deliver features, but the absence of documentation has a way of multiplying confusion, slowing down progress, and isolating knowledge within a handful of individuals.

The goal isn’t to write novels. It’s to create just enough clarity so others—whether teammates, future maintainers, or auditors—can navigate the system with confidence. The best documentation lives close to the code, evolves with it, and speaks in a voice that welcomes the reader, rather than overwhelming them.

Good documentation won’t make a bad system great—but it will make a good system sustainable. And sometimes, that’s what makes all the difference.

---

Interested in more like this?
I'm writing a full A–Z series on non-functional requirements — topics that shape how software behaves in the real world, not just what it does on paper.

Join the newsletter to get notified when the next one drops.