Rockchip vs NXP – How to Choose the Right Embedded SoC for Your Product

kevinliu121kevinliu121
3 min read

Selecting the right System on Chip (SoC) is one of the most important decisions a product development team can make. Whether you're building an industrial panel PC, an AI-powered gateway, or a smart HMI, the choice between Rockchip and NXP is likely to come up. These two families dominate many embedded markets—but they take very different approaches.

This article offers a concise, field-tested comparison to help teams choose wisely.


⚙️ Architecture Overview

FeatureRockchip (e.g. RK3566/RK3588)NXP (e.g. i.MX8M Mini/Plus)
CPU CoresQuad-core / Octa-core Cortex-A55/A76Quad-core Cortex-A53
GPUMali G52 / G610GC7000L / Vivante GPUs
NPU / AI AccelerationYes (0.8–6 TOPS)Yes (i.MX8M Plus)
Video Codec4K/60fps H.264/H.265Limited to 1080p in some models
MultimediaAdvanced, multi-displayMore conservative
Industrial FocusStrong in consumer + embeddedStrong in automotive + industrial

💡 When to Choose Rockchip

Rockchip SoCs are widely used in Android-based embedded products such as media players, smart panels, and human-machine interfaces.

✅ Pros:

  • High performance per dollar (especially RK3566, RK3588)

  • Strong multimedia capabilities (multi-display, 4K video)

  • Built-in NPU for AI inference at the edge

  • Broad Android BSP support

⚠️ Cons:

  • Slightly less documentation in English

  • Not as mature in long-term industrial life cycle management


🛡️ When to Choose NXP

NXP is often the go-to choice for industrial, medical, and automotive embedded products.

✅ Pros:

  • Long-term supply chain commitment (10-15 years)

  • Excellent Yocto BSP and mainline Linux support

  • Rich peripheral and interface options (CAN, TSN Ethernet)

⚠️ Cons:

  • Lower graphical performance

  • No AI accelerator unless using Plus series

  • Higher cost for comparable compute power


📈 Market and Ecosystem

  • Rockchip is widely adopted by ODMs in China and Asia for smart devices.

  • NXP has strong traction with Tier-1 industrial and automotive OEMs in Europe and North America.

🔗 For a more detailed engineering breakdown of Rockchip vs NXP, including real-world performance metrics and target use cases, check out this article on Dev.to:
👉 Rockchip vs NXP – A Deep‑Dive for Product Teams Choosing Their Next Embedded SoC


🧪 Developer Experience

FeatureRockchipNXP
Android SupportExcellentLimited
Linux Kernel4.19–5.10 (some BSPs)Often mainline Yocto
DocumentationCommunity + Chinese docsExcellent industrial docs
SDK ComplexityMediumHigh (Yocto-focused)
BootloadersU-Boot, sometimes Android A/BU-Boot (industrial-grade)

🧭 Final Decision: How to Choose

Your FocusSuggested SoC
Multimedia/4K/AndroidRockchip RK3566 / RK3588
Industrial/AutomotiveNXP i.MX8M / Plus
AI GatewayRockchip w/ NPU or i.MX8M Plus
Cost-SensitiveRockchip wins
Longevity-CriticalNXP wins

🔍 Bonus: Real-World Tips for SoC Evaluation

  • Test the BSP out-of-the-box: Can you boot, display, and run your GUI easily?

  • Check NPU/AI needs: Not all SoCs support TensorFlow Lite or ONNX well.

  • Power and thermal: NXP generally runs cooler; Rockchip may need better heat management at high loads.

  • Vendor support: Check how responsive the SoC vendor is for SDK/BSP help.


📚 Additional Resources

  1. NXP i.MX8M Product Family Overview

  2. Rockchip RK3566 Datasheet (via CN vendors) (Unofficial mirror)

  3. Understanding NPU Acceleration in Embedded Systems – Edge AI Fundamentals


If you’ve faced this choice in a real product, feel free to share your experience below—your feedback could help the next engineer or PM make the right call.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from kevinliu121 directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

kevinliu121
kevinliu121