Rockchip vs NXP – How to Choose the Right Embedded SoC for Your Product

Selecting the right System on Chip (SoC) is one of the most important decisions a product development team can make. Whether you're building an industrial panel PC, an AI-powered gateway, or a smart HMI, the choice between Rockchip and NXP is likely to come up. These two families dominate many embedded markets—but they take very different approaches.
This article offers a concise, field-tested comparison to help teams choose wisely.
⚙️ Architecture Overview
Feature | Rockchip (e.g. RK3566/RK3588) | NXP (e.g. i.MX8M Mini/Plus) |
CPU Cores | Quad-core / Octa-core Cortex-A55/A76 | Quad-core Cortex-A53 |
GPU | Mali G52 / G610 | GC7000L / Vivante GPUs |
NPU / AI Acceleration | Yes (0.8–6 TOPS) | Yes (i.MX8M Plus) |
Video Codec | 4K/60fps H.264/H.265 | Limited to 1080p in some models |
Multimedia | Advanced, multi-display | More conservative |
Industrial Focus | Strong in consumer + embedded | Strong in automotive + industrial |
💡 When to Choose Rockchip
Rockchip SoCs are widely used in Android-based embedded products such as media players, smart panels, and human-machine interfaces.
✅ Pros:
High performance per dollar (especially RK3566, RK3588)
Strong multimedia capabilities (multi-display, 4K video)
Built-in NPU for AI inference at the edge
Broad Android BSP support
⚠️ Cons:
Slightly less documentation in English
Not as mature in long-term industrial life cycle management
🛡️ When to Choose NXP
NXP is often the go-to choice for industrial, medical, and automotive embedded products.
✅ Pros:
Long-term supply chain commitment (10-15 years)
Excellent Yocto BSP and mainline Linux support
Rich peripheral and interface options (CAN, TSN Ethernet)
⚠️ Cons:
Lower graphical performance
No AI accelerator unless using Plus series
Higher cost for comparable compute power
📈 Market and Ecosystem
Rockchip is widely adopted by ODMs in China and Asia for smart devices.
NXP has strong traction with Tier-1 industrial and automotive OEMs in Europe and North America.
🔗 For a more detailed engineering breakdown of Rockchip vs NXP, including real-world performance metrics and target use cases, check out this article on Dev.to:
👉 Rockchip vs NXP – A Deep‑Dive for Product Teams Choosing Their Next Embedded SoC
🧪 Developer Experience
Feature | Rockchip | NXP |
Android Support | Excellent | Limited |
Linux Kernel | 4.19–5.10 (some BSPs) | Often mainline Yocto |
Documentation | Community + Chinese docs | Excellent industrial docs |
SDK Complexity | Medium | High (Yocto-focused) |
Bootloaders | U-Boot, sometimes Android A/B | U-Boot (industrial-grade) |
🧭 Final Decision: How to Choose
Your Focus | Suggested SoC |
Multimedia/4K/Android | Rockchip RK3566 / RK3588 |
Industrial/Automotive | NXP i.MX8M / Plus |
AI Gateway | Rockchip w/ NPU or i.MX8M Plus |
Cost-Sensitive | Rockchip wins |
Longevity-Critical | NXP wins |
🔍 Bonus: Real-World Tips for SoC Evaluation
Test the BSP out-of-the-box: Can you boot, display, and run your GUI easily?
Check NPU/AI needs: Not all SoCs support TensorFlow Lite or ONNX well.
Power and thermal: NXP generally runs cooler; Rockchip may need better heat management at high loads.
Vendor support: Check how responsive the SoC vendor is for SDK/BSP help.
📚 Additional Resources
Rockchip RK3566 Datasheet (via CN vendors) (Unofficial mirror)
Understanding NPU Acceleration in Embedded Systems – Edge AI Fundamentals
If you’ve faced this choice in a real product, feel free to share your experience below—your feedback could help the next engineer or PM make the right call.
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from kevinliu121 directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by
