Trae vs Cursor: AI Code Editor Comparison

5 min read

โก Speed & Performance
Aspect | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Startup Speed | Fast (VS Code fork) | Fast (VS Code fork) | Fastest (native) |
Memory Usage | Moderate | Higher (more RAM) | Lower (minimal AI overhead) |
File Handling | Good | May lag with very large files | Excellent (optimized) |
AI Response Time | Methodical but accurate | Fast for small-medium files | Quick inline suggestions |
Project-wide Tasks | Good | Excellent (faster multi-file ops) | Good |
Large Codebase | Unknown (new) | Can be sluggish | Battle-tested efficiency |
Winner: VS Code for overall performance, Cursor for multi-file operations
๐ Ease to Rollback & Undo
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Undo Granularity | Standard editor undo | Rich undo capabilities | Improved undo functionality |
AI Change Tracking | Basic | Advanced diff view | Enhanced with agent mode |
Rollback Method | Manual (Ctrl+Z) | One-click "Undo Last Edit" | "Undo Last Edit" in agent mode |
Multi-file Rollback | Manual per file | Can revert multi-file changes | Agent mode supports bulk undo |
Preview Before Apply | Builder Mode shows preview | Review changes with diff view | Review changes before acceptance |
Persistence Issues | Unknown | Some users report random reverts | Occasional cache-related rollbacks |
Winner: Tie between Cursor and VS Code, both offer superior rollback capabilities compared to Trae
๐ค Model Selection & Availability
Available Models
Platform | Free Models | Premium Models | Custom Models |
Trae | Claude 3.7 Sonnet GPT-4o DeepSeek R1 | All included free | โ No |
Cursor | Limited selection | GPT-4o, o1, o3-mini Claude 3.5 Sonnet cursor-small (custom) | โ Yes |
VS Code | Basic Copilot | GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Multiple provider support Bring-your-own API keys | โ Yes |
Model Switching
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Easy Switching | โ Simple dropdown | โ Model picker | โ Multiple providers |
Context Retention | Unknown | โ Maintains context | โ Conversation continuity |
Speed Optimization | Limited options | Choose based on task | Automatic model selection |
Cost Control | N/A (free) | Usage-based pricing | Tiered pricing |
Winner: VS Code for flexibility, Trae for free access to premium models
๐ ๏ธ Features Comparison
Core AI Features
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Code Completion | Comment-driven generation | Advanced tab completion Auto-imports | Inline suggestions Next edit predictions |
Multi-file Editing | Builder Mode | Composer Mode Cross-file refactoring | Agent mode Project-wide changes |
Chat Interface | Side + Inline Chat | Context-aware chat | Multiple conversation threads |
Code Review | โ Not available | Bug detection & fixes | AI-powered code review |
Terminal Integration | Basic suggestions | Limited integration | Full terminal AI support |
Development Workflow
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Project Setup | Builder Mode (excellent) | Good | Standard with AI assistance |
Debugging | Basic | AI-powered debugging | Smart debugging with AI |
Testing | Unknown | Code generation | Test generation & execution |
Documentation | Unknown | Limited | Auto-documentation |
Git Integration | Standard | Standard | AI commit messages PR descriptions |
Customization & Extensions
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Themes | 3 options (limited) | Extensive theme support | Largest theme ecosystem |
Extensions | VS Code compatible | VS Code compatible | Native + largest marketplace |
AI Customization | Limited | Global rules & behaviors | Custom instructions Custom chat modes |
Workspace Settings | Basic | Advanced | Most comprehensive |
Enterprise & Team Features
Feature | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Team Collaboration | Unknown | Basic | Full enterprise support |
Policy Management | โ No | Limited | Comprehensive policies |
Analytics | โ No | Basic usage stats | Detailed usage analytics |
Security | Data privacy concerns | Standard | Enterprise-grade security |
Compliance | Unknown | Basic | SOC 2, ISO certifications |
๐ Summary Scores
Category | Trae | Cursor | VS Code + Copilot |
Speed | 8/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Rollback Ease | 6/10 | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Model Selection | 9/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Feature Richness | 6/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Customization | 5/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Enterprise Ready | 3/10 | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Cost Effectiveness | 10/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 |
๐ Final Recommendations
Choose Trae if:
- You want free access to premium AI models
- You're experimenting with AI coding
- Budget is a primary constraint
- You prefer methodical, accurate-first-attempt coding
Choose Cursor if:
- You want the most advanced AI-first coding experience
- You need sophisticated multi-file operations
- You can afford premium pricing
- You want cutting-edge AI features
Choose VS Code + Copilot if:
- You need enterprise-grade reliability and security
- You want the most comprehensive feature set
- You prefer gradual AI adoption
- You're already invested in the Microsoft/GitHub ecosystem
- You need the best rollback and undo capabilities
Performance metrics based on user reports and official documentation as of June 2025
0
Subscribe to my newsletter
Read articles from Anni Huang directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.
Written by

Anni Huang
Anni Huang
I am Anni HUANG, a software engineer with 3 years of experience in IDE development and Chatbot.