Understanding AI Agents vs. Agentic AI

In today’s rapidly evolving AI landscape, two terms often surface—but can easily be conflated—AI Agents and Agentic AI. While they share a root in “agent,” their scope, autonomy, and applications differ profoundly. In this post, we’ll unpack their definitions, explore why they matter, compare their characteristics side by side, and walk through concrete code examples. Whether you’re a developer architecting your first autonomous workflow or a decision-maker evaluating AI strategies, this guide will equip you with clarity and actionable insights.


What Are AI Agents?

An AI Agent is a software construct designed to autonomously perform specific, well-defined tasks on behalf of a user or another system. Under the hood, an AI Agent typically follows a sense–plan–act cycle:

  1. Sense: Perceive inputs (e.g., user queries, API responses).

  2. Plan: Decompose goals into subtasks or tool calls.

  3. Act: Execute actions by invoking tools, services, or other agents, then return results.

Why it matters: AI Agents excel at automating repetitive or narrowly scoped workflows—like generating code snippets, responding to support tickets, or orchestrating data pipelines—while keeping human oversight in the loop.

Example: Math-Solving Agent with LangChain

from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool, AgentType

def calculator_fn(query: str) -> str:
    return str(eval(query))  # Simple math evaluation

calculator_tool = Tool(
    name="Calculator",
    func=calculator_fn,
    description="Performs arithmetic operations."
)

llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
math_agent = initialize_agent(
    tools=[calculator_tool],
    llm=llm,
    agent_type=AgentType.ZERO_SHOT_REACT_DESCRIPTION,
    verbose=True
)

print(math_agent.run("What is 256 * (12 + 8)?"))

This agent senses your question, plans to use the Calculator tool, acts by executing the calculation, and returns the answer.

What Is Agentic AI?

Agentic AI elevates the concept of a single AI Agent into a coordinated ecosystem of specialised agents working together toward complex, multi-step objectives, often with minimal human intervention. Key hallmarks include:

  • Autonomy & Planning: Generates and refines long-term plans rather than simply reacting to single prompts.

  • Collaboration: Orchestrates subagents (e.g., “researcher,” “planner,” “executor”) to tackle different facets of a goal.

  • Adaptivity: Monitors feedback and external data, dynamically adjusting strategies (e.g., retrying failed steps).

  • Continuous Learning: Improves over time by incorporating new data and human feedback into future decision-making.

Why it matters: Agentic AI powers end-to-end automation of intricate workflows, such as supply-chain management, virtual project management, and adaptive customer journeys, reducing manual orchestration and improving efficiency at scale.

Example: Two-Agent Orchestration

from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, Tool, AgentType

# Planner breaks high-level goals into steps
def planner_fn(task: str) -> str:
    return """
    1. Research flights from NYC to LAX.
    2. Compare prices under $300.
    3. Book selected flight and email confirmation.
    """

planner_tool = Tool(
    name="Planner",
    func=planner_fn,
    description="Creates multi-step plans for complex tasks."
)

# Executor carries out individual plan steps
def executor_fn(step: str) -> str:
    return f"Executed: {step.strip()}"

executor_tool = Tool(
    name="Executor",
    func=executor_fn,
    description="Performs a single plan step."
)

llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
agentic_system = initialize_agent(
    tools=[planner_tool, executor_tool],
    llm=llm,
    agent_type=AgentType.OPENAI_MULTI_ACTION,
    verbose=True
)

print(agentic_system.run(
    "Plan and book a one-way flight from New York to Los Angeles under $300."
))

Here, the Planner generates the steps and the Executor implements each one, with the orchestrator looping until the task is complete.

Key Differences at a Glance

AspectAI AgentAgentic AI
ScopeSingle tasks or workflowsComplex, end-to-end workflows
AutonomyReactive (driven by explicit prompts/tools)Proactive (self-driven planning & adaptation)
StructureOne agent per goalEcosystem of collaborating subagents
Learning HorizonShort-term memory, iterative refinementLong-term learning across tasks & environments
Typical Use CasesChatbots, code generation, and simple automationSupply-chain orchestration, virtual project managers

Why This Distinction Matters

  • Scalability: Agentic AI can coordinate dozens of specialised agents, scaling complex processes without exponential human oversight.

  • Resilience: Through continuous feedback loops, agentic systems detect failures early and adapt plans in real time.

  • Flexibility: Modular subagents can be replaced or upgraded independently, fostering rapid iteration and domain expansion.

Understanding when to deploy a standalone AI Agent versus a full-fledged Agentic AI framework is crucial for architects and decision-makers aiming to balance development effort, cost, and operational complexity.

Conclusion

AI Agents are powerful tools for automating discrete tasks with clear boundaries, while Agentic AI represents the next frontier—an integrated orchestra of agents collaborating to solve complex, evolving challenges. By grasping their distinctions, you can architect systems that strike the right balance between autonomy, oversight, and scalability.

TL;DR

  • AI Agents automate single-use cases (e.g., math solving, Q&A) via a sense–plan–act loop.

  • Agentic AI coordinates multiple subagents to achieve complex, multi-step objectives, incorporating planning, adaptation, and continuous learning.

  • Choose AI Agents for targeted automation; opt for Agentic AI when tackling end-to-end workflows at scale.

References

  • IBM, “What are AI agents?”, “Agentic AI vs. Generative AI”

  • Wikipedia, “Intelligent agent”, “Agentic AI”

  • NVIDIA Blog, “What Is Agentic AI?”



Thanks for coming this far in the article. I hope I was able to explain the concept well enough. If you face any issues, please feel free to reach out to me; I'd be happy to help.

🔗 Let’s stay connected!

🌐 Linktree| 🐦 X| 📸 Instagram| ▶️ YouTube ✍️ Hashnode| 💻 GitHub| 🔗 LinkedIn| 🤝 Topmate 🏅 Credly

© 2025 Shishir Srivastav. All rights reserved.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from shishir srivastav directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

shishir srivastav
shishir srivastav

Developer, Exploring the world online. I write logical code in IT and talk Illogically in reality.