Introduction to Frontend Testing: Tools, Strategies & Best Practices

Abheeshta PAbheeshta P
3 min read

βœ… Why Automated Testing Over Manual?

  • Manual testing is slow, error-prone, and inconsistent.

  • Automated testing ensures code behaves as expected every time you make changes.

  • Helps catch bugs early, improves confidence in deployment, and allows safe refactoring.

🧰 Testing Tools

1. React Testing Library (RTL):

  • A wrapper around DOM Testing Library.

  • Encourages testing components from the user's perspective (interaction, not internal logic).

  • Avoids testing implementation details.

2. Jest:

  • JavaScript testing framework used to run, organize, and report tests.

  • Supports mocks, timers, snapshots, and test isolation.

  • Commonly used alongside RTL in React applications.

πŸ§ͺ Types of Testing

1. Unit Testing

  • Tests individual functions, components, or classes.

  • Dependencies are mocked to isolate the unit.

  • Fast to run and easy to write.

  • Example: testing if a button triggers a handler.

2. Integration Testing

  • Tests how multiple units work together.

  • Checks the flow between components, services, or modules.

  • More complex but gives better coverage.

3. End-to-End (E2E) Testing

  • Simulates real user experience β€” actual UI, actual backend, actual DB.

  • Tools like Cypress, Playwright, or Puppeteer are used.

  • Slowest, but gives the highest confidence.

πŸ“ Testing Strategy

  • Start with unit tests to cover basic functionality.

  • Add integration tests to validate the flow between components.

  • Add end-to-end tests for core user journeys.

  • Don’t overdo E2E due to maintenance cost and slowness.

🧠 React Testing Library (RTL) Philosophy

  • Focuses on how the component behaves rather than how it is implemented.

  • Encourages testing interactions and outcomes, not props/state/internal logic.

  • RTL sits between unit and E2E testing β€” lightweight but behavior-focused.

✍️ Jest – Writing Tests

Basic Syntax:

test("description", () => {
  // Arrange
  // Act
  // Assert
});

Or using it() (BDD-style):

describe("Button component", () => {
  it("should trigger onClick", () => {
    // test code
  });
});
  • test() and it() are interchangeable β€” just stylistic difference.

  • Can optionally add a timeout as the third argument (default: 5 seconds).

πŸ” Testing Pattern – AAA (Arrange, Act, Assert)

  1. Arrange – set up your test data and environment.

  2. Act – execute the logic or simulate the event.

  3. Assert – check if the result is as expected.

Example:

render(<Button onClick={handleClick} />);
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText("Submit"));
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalled();

πŸ§ͺ Test-Driven Development (TDD)

  • Write tests before writing the component logic.

  • Follows Red β†’ Green β†’ Refactor:

    1. πŸ”΄ Red – write failing tests first

    2. 🟒 Green – implement code to pass tests

    3. ♻️ Refactor – clean and optimize

  • TDD helps you think deeply about requirements and avoid over-engineering.

πŸ” Watch Mode (Automatic Test Reruns)

  • Useful during development to rerun only the tests relevant to your current changes.

  • Create React App supports this by default using npm test.

With Jest in custom setup:

In your package.json, add:

"scripts": {
  "test": "jest",
  "test:watch": "jest --watch"
}

Then run:

npm run test:watch

Follow to get next articles on Frontend testing

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Abheeshta P directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Abheeshta P
Abheeshta P

I am a Full-stack dev turning ideas into sleek, functional experiences πŸš€. I am passionate about AI, intuitive UI/UX, and crafting user-friendly platforms . I am always curious – from building websites to diving into machine learning and under the hood workings ✨. Next.js, Node.js, MongoDB, and Tailwind are my daily tools. I am here to share dev experiments, lessons learned, and the occasional late-night code breakthroughs. Always evolving, always building.