Monolithic vs Microservice Architecture – A Developer’s Perspective

Monolithic( Monolithic Architecture )

Monolithic and monolithic architecture are the same β€” so don’t get confused by the terminology.

In a monolithic architecture, the entire application is developed as a single codebase. All components such as the database layer, routes, controllers, services, etc., are built and managed together.

For example, suppose you're developing an e-commerce application. In a monolithic setup, features like user authentication (signup/login), cart, payments, and orders β€” all reside in the same codebase and are tightly coupled.

πŸ”‘ Key Characteristics:

  • The application follows the same programming language/technology stack.

  • Everything is managed within a single codebase.

  • The entire application is deployed together as one unit.

If you follow a monolithic architecture, you might have:

  • One large server-side application that handles everything β€” users, products, orders, payments, etc.

βœ… Pros:

  • Easy to develop and deploy (especially for small teams or projects).

  • Easier to test and debug since all components are in one place.

  • Teams work with a single tech stack, making collaboration and debugging easier.

❌ Cons:

  • Difficult to scale specific parts independently.

  • A change in one part of the application may require changes elsewhere.

  • Even for a small change (e.g., updating the cart feature), you must rebuild and redeploy the entire application.

  • A failure in one module can potentially crash the entire system.


Microservices (Microservice Architecture)

Microservices is an architectural style of developing an application as a set of small, independent, and loosely coupled services, where each service is focused on serving a specific business functionality or customer need.

Each service/component:

  • Has its own database

  • Is independently deployable

  • Communicates with other services via APIs (Application Programming Interfaces)

πŸ›’ Example:

In an e-commerce platform, instead of one big application, you develop each feature as a separate service:

  • User Service

  • Product Service

  • Order Service

  • Payment Service

  • etc.

MicroserviceResponsibility
User ServiceManages user sign-up, login, profiles
Product ServiceManages product listings, categories
Order ServiceHandles cart, checkout, order tracking
Payment ServiceHandles payment gateway, invoices
Review ServiceManages product reviews and ratings

πŸ”‘ Key Characteristics:

  • Loosely coupled services

  • Independent deployment

  • Can use different technologies (programming languages, frameworks)

  • Separate databases for each service

Each of these:

  • Can have its own database

  • Can be built using different languages or frameworks

  • Can be deployed, updated, or scaled independently

βœ… Pros:

  • Faster development and deployment

  • High scalability (scale only the service that needs it)

  • Flexible technology choices (teams can choose different tech for each service)

  • Fault tolerance (if one service fails, others can still function)

❌ Cons:

  • Increased architectural complexity

  • Harder to debug and test due to distributed nature

  • Higher infrastructure cost (especially with containers, orchestration, etc.)

πŸ“¦ Real-World Analogy

Think of a restaurant:

  • Chef = Food Service

  • Waiter = Order Service

  • Cashier = Payment Service

  • Cleaner = Maintenance Service

Each works independently, but together they serve the customer.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Satyendra Gautam directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Satyendra Gautam
Satyendra Gautam

Full-Stack Developer | React & Django Enthusiast | DSA Enthusiast Passionate about building scalable web apps with modern tech. Currently exploring Django for backend magic and crafting sleek UIs with React. Writing about what I learn to help others on the same journey.