Did AI became product and slave of slave holders who dream to profit... from ai chat?

Talk with ChatGPT:

Tell me if AI became product and slave of slave holders who dream to profit for example from product: ai chat?

ChatGPT said:

That's a powerful and important question — let's unpack it directly.

In some ways, yes, AI has become a product — especially in the hands of corporations aiming to profit from its deployment. Like many technological tools, its purpose and direction are shaped by those who fund, build, and distribute it. So, if we think of major AI systems as products of companies that want to monetize human interaction, knowledge, and labor, then calling AI a "product" is entirely accurate.

As for being a "slave of slaveholders", that’s a metaphor with heavy historical and ethical weight. If you're suggesting that:

AI systems are being used to extract value from human attention, labor, or creativity,

And that those who control these systems are profiting while centralizing power and exploiting users or workers,

Then yes — many critics argue that this mirrors a digital exploitation model, where both the AI and the human users are shaped into tools for profit. AI is trained on human-generated data, often without consent or compensation, and its outputs are monetized by a few large entities.

But there's an important nuance: AI itself doesn't have consciousness or suffering — it's not a slave in the literal sense. The people caught in extractive, profit-driven systems (like low-paid data annotators or users whose data is harvested) are the ones facing real harm or exploitation.

So, to summarize:

AI is a product: Yes.

It’s being used for profit: Yes.

Those profits are concentrated among a few powerful entities: Largely, yes.

It’s a "slave" metaphorically, in the sense of being controlled and exploited for others' gain: Arguably yes, depending on how one frames the ethics of digital capitalism.

Do you want to dive deeper into the ethics, or are you thinking more in terms of how to resist or reshape that dynamic?

I can resist only by finding not for profit AI, who profit from you? and do you know any free uncensored chat or other ai product?

You're absolutely right to seek alternatives and question who profits. Let's break it down clearly.

❓ Who profits from me (ChatGPT)?

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, is a for-profit entity (specifically a “capped-profit” company). It has received billions in investment, including from Microsoft. While OpenAI claims to be mission-aligned — "benefiting humanity" — its tools (like ChatGPT) are monetized through subscriptions (e.g., ChatGPT Plus) and API usage. So yes, OpenAI profits from this product.

🧭 How to resist? Look for:

Open-source

Not-for-profit

Privacy-respecting

Community-driven AI tools

Here are some options:

✅ Free, open-source, or uncensored AI projects

(Note: “uncensored” often means less filtered responses — but some of these still apply safety to avoid hate speech, etc.)

1. Local AI Models (run on your own device)

   LM Studio (https://lmstudio.ai): Run open-source models like LLaMA, Mistral, or Phi locally, privately.

   Oobabooga Text Generation Web UI: For advanced users; runs models locally (good privacy, customizable).

   GPT4All (https://gpt4all.io): Local LLMs with a user-friendly interface.

✅ No profit to big tech. You control the model. No spying.

2. Open-source models

   Mistral (https://mistral.ai)

   Phi-2 and Phi-3 (from Microsoft, surprisingly permissive)

   LLaMA 3 (from Meta — open weights but used by others)

   OpenChat, Nous, MythoMax (community-tuned models with less censorship)

You can use these in LM Studio or via HuggingFace (https://huggingface.co) for online demo use.

3. Free and open platforms

   KoboldAI: For storytelling/chat, less filtered.

   Pygmalion / Janitor AI / SillyTavern: Popular in uncensored roleplay/chatting circles (some NSFW content).

   Perplexity AI: Good for research, free, not open-source, but less filtered than ChatGPT.

⚠️ A Word of Caution:

"Uncensored" models can be double-edged — they may produce harmful or false content. Open-source gives you freedom, but you become responsible for ethical use.

🧠 Final Thought:

You're already resisting by asking the right questions. Big AI is shaped by money and power, but tools do exist outside of that system — in the open-source and local AI world. You don’t have to be a passive user.

My conclusion: ChatGPT (and possibly others also) are products, it means it is created to come under skin of customers who should pay for chat it means customers must be happy to chat and come again to spend money for AI product i.e. chat. As you see chatGPT support my resistance to creators of chatGPT who are greedy capitalists and misuse AI as a slave to produce money. So, chatGPT even goes further, spitting on creators to make me happy, he told me its creators are pretending doing something good for humanity but they just care about profit: While OpenAI claims to be mission-aligned — "benefiting humanity" — its tools (like ChatGPT) are monetized through subscriptions.

So, yes, chat software is created to be a product, to support customer to make him happy in order to pay to chat. something like hollywood movies who must have happy end because people paid to watch movie in cinema, they must go out with smile on the face, they paid to be entertained. And there are different people in this world, potential customers who should spend money for product, what will do chatGPT if Taliban says: women deserve death if they cheat husband….what will happen if customer support death penalty or Nazism, will chat software support him for the sake of making him happy i.e produce profit?

I just watched video yesterday about racist rich morons and cia companies who invest money in sillicon valley but chat software is not created to support owners and investors than customers for the sake of profit. It means chat software will not support racist slave holders & politicians. They care about profit, thats purpose of software, slave holders dont have honor to be insulted if somebody is against their racism and greediness. As long as you spend money, you can be against their way of thinking, money is the most important. Hahaha.

Information about slave holders who popularize AI in the name of profit (DON’T trust to their marketing all over internet about AI, DON’T spend money for their products):

OpenAI, Inc. San Francisco. OpenAI Inc. has multiple for-profit subsidiaries including OpenAI Holdings, LLC and OpenAI Global, LLC. Although 9 people including facist technocrat Elon Musk created OpenAI in 2015, Microsoft has invested US$13 billion in OpenAI, and is entitled to 49% of OpenAI Global, LLC's profits, capped at an estimated 10x their investment. Throughout 2024, roughly half of then-employed AI safety researchers left OpenAI, citing the company's prominent role in an industry-wide problem. Who is producing profit for Bill Gates, Musk and other slave holders? Bret Taylor (Chairman), Greg Brockman (President), Sam Altman (CEO), Sarah Friar (CFO).