Understanding Fine-Tuning and Core AI Concepts: A Beginner's Guide

Satarupa DebSatarupa Deb
9 min read

Imagine teaching a skilled chef a new cuisine. They already know how to cook, but you're showing them Italian dishes specifically. This is exactly what fine-tuning does for AI models: it takes a pre-trained model (the "chef" with general knowledge) and adapts it to a specialized task. In machine learning, fine-tuning is the process of taking a pretrained ML model and further training it on a smaller, targeted data set. In other words, you're building on existing knowledge rather than starting from scratch.

A pre-trained model is like that experienced chef: they have seen many recipes (data) and learned general cooking skills. The base model (also called a foundation model) is the original model before any new training, think of it as a fresh culinary school graduate with broad cooking skills. A foundation model is pre-trained to perform a range of tasks and provides a general baseline of knowledge that can then be fine-tuned to any domain.

Datasets: Training, Validation, and Test Sets

To teach our "chef," we need examples of recipes and dishes. In ML, these are split into different data sets. The training set is like the main cookbook used for teaching: it contains examples that the model uses to learn. During training, the model adjusts its parameters to fit the training data.

We also use a validation set, a separate set of recipes the chef tries during practice. This lets us check progress and tune the learning process (when to stop or how big the learning rate should be) without peeking at the final exam. Finally, the test set is the final exam: new recipes the chef has never seen. This evaluates how well the chef (model) learned to generalize to fresh examples. The test set provides an unbiased evaluation of a final model on unseen data.

  • Training set: Used to fit the model's parameters (the chef learning from the main cookbook)

  • Validation set: A held-out set of data for tuning hyperparameters and checking learning progress (like practicing a few new recipes during training)

  • Test set: The final hold-out set, only used after training to evaluate how well the model generalizes (the chef's final exam)

We can also apply data augmentation to artificially expand our training set. This is like tweaking recipes (changing ingredients slightly, altering cooking times, etc.) to create more varied examples for the chef. Augmentation prevents overfitting by giving the model more diverse data.

The Training Process: Epochs, Batches, Learning Rate, and Gradient Descent

Training the model is an iterative process. The dataset is usually too large to teach all at once, so it's split into batches. A batch size is how many examples (recipes) the model processes before updating its knowledge. For instance, if you have 1,000 samples and use a batch size of 100, the model trains on 10 batches per pass. Each time the model goes through one batch and updates its weights is one iteration: going through all batches once is one epoch. Thus, one epoch means one complete pass over the entire training set. Think of it as teaching all 100 recipes in the cookbook once: that's one epoch of learning.

Between epochs, we check the validation set to see if the chef is improving or if it's time to stop (to avoid overfitting). The learning rate is a crucial hyperparameter: it determines how big a step the model (or chef) takes when updating its knowledge. A high learning rate means big changes, the chef might drastically change techniques (risking ruin), a low learning rate means tiny adjustments and slow learning. The learning rate is the step size at each iteration while moving toward a minimum of a loss function, metaphorically the speed at which the model learns.

The actual learning algorithm is usually gradient descent or one of its variants. Gradient descent is the process of gradually improving the model by nudging its parameters in the direction that reduces error (loss). It's an optimization algorithm which is commonly used to train ML models by minimizing errors between predictions and actual results. In cooking terms, it's like the chef tasting the sauce and adjusting the salt little by little: step by step to make it perfect.

With each batch or iteration, the model computes the loss function (how wrong it is, like a taste-test score). Then it uses an optimizer (e.g. SGD, Adam) to update the weights in the negative gradient direction. Over time, the updates get smaller as the chef's dishes get closer to ideal, the training converges when further improvements become marginal.

  • Epoch: One full pass through all training examples

  • Batch size: Number of examples processed before an update (chefs practicing a handful of recipes before feedback)

  • Learning rate: Step size of each update, too high risks overshooting, too low means slow learning

  • Gradient descent: The iterative process of moving in the direction of steepest error reduction (like fine-tuning a recipe bit by bit)

Advanced Fine-Tuning Techniques: LoRA, QLoRA, and PEFT

Full fine-tuning (retraining all model parameters) can be very expensive for large models (billions of parameters). Instead, we often use parameter-efficient methods. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) is one such technique. LoRA adapts large models to specific uses by adding lightweight pieces to the original model rather than changing the entire model. In our chef analogy, this is like tweaking only the seasoning skills of the chef for Italian cooking instead of reteaching all cooking fundamentals.

In practice, LoRA freezes the base model's weights and adds small, trainable low-rank matrices to each layer. These "adapter" matrices learn just enough extra flavor to specialize the model. A variant called QLoRA (Quantized LoRA) combines low-precision storage with high-precision computation to compress the model's knowledge. QLoRA keeps the model compact (small memory footprint) while remaining highly accurate: think of it as giving the chef concise recipe notes instead of a full cookbook.

More generally, these methods fall under PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning): the strategy of making small, targeted changes rather than retraining from scratch. A fully fine-tuned model (retraining every parameter) would be like sending the chef back to culinary school for months, possible but costly. PEFT methods like LoRA let us efficiently adapt the chef's existing skills with minimal extra effort.

  • LoRA: Freezes original model and adds low-rank weight updates. Only a small number of new parameters are trained

  • QLoRA: A variant of LoRA that quantizes the model to reduce memory, combining full-precision updates with low-bit storage

  • PEFT: Any fine-tuning approach (like LoRA, adapters, prefix-tuning) that changes only part of the model to save resources

  • Full fine-tuning: Updating all model parameters; analogous to completely retraining the chef, which is far more expensive

Evaluation: Overfitting, Underfitting, and Generalization

During training we must watch for overfitting or underfitting. An overfit model has learned the training data too well (memorized recipes) and fails on new examples. Overfitting happens when a model gives accurate predictions for training data but not for new data. In our analogy, the chef might have perfectly memorized the cookbook recipes (even trivial details) but then makes a mess with any new dish. Overfitting means poor generalization: the chef cannot adapt his skills to new situations.

Conversely, underfitting is when the model (chef) has not learned enough from the training data and performs poorly even on the taught examples. Underfitting is like a chef who still messes up basic recipes despite practicing them. Underfitting occurs when the model cannot determine a meaningful relationship between input and output: think of it as the chef still making fundamental mistakes.

Ideally, we strike a balance so the model generalizes well. Generalization is the ability to apply learned principles to new data: the chef successfully cooking a brand-new Italian dish using general cooking skills. We also save checkpoints during training, snapshots of the model's state. Checkpoints are like pausing and saving the chef's progress: if training crashes (or if a new change worsens performance), we can roll back to a previous stable version. This safeguards our work and lets us experiment (for example, trying a different learning rate) without losing all progress.

  • Overfitting: Model fits training data too closely and fails to generalize (chef memorizes the cookbook but flops on new recipes)

  • Underfitting: Model has not learned enough and performs poorly even on training data (chef still makes basic mistakes)

  • Generalization: The model's ability to handle new, unseen examples (chef cooking new dish well)

  • Checkpoint: A saved model snapshot during training to recover if something goes wrong

Loss Functions and Optimization

A loss function measures how well the model is doing: like a scoring system for the chef's dishes. A loss function quantifies the deviation of a model's predictions from the correct ground truth. During training, the model "learns" by minimizing this loss: each prediction has a small "error score," and the model updates its weights to reduce that score over time. The optimizer (like Adam or SGD) is the method used to apply these updates, guided by the loss gradient. When the model's loss stops decreasing significantly across epochs, we say it has converged: analogous to the chef plateauing in skill improvement with the current teaching.

Specialized Fine-Tuning: Instruction Tuning, RLHF, and Few-Shot

Beyond basic fine-tuning, there are specialized approaches to align models with certain behaviors. Instruction tuning involves fine-tuning on pairs of instructions and ideal outputs (like teaching the chef not only recipes but also how to present dishes elegantly). Instruction tuning means fine-tuning LLMs on a dataset of instructions and outputs, improving the model's ability to follow instructions in general. In practice, it makes the model more compliant with prompts (e.g. plating style requests).

Another technique is Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Here, human preferences guide training. Imagine food critics tasting the chef's dishes and scoring them: these scores become a reward signal. The model then learns (via a policy optimization algorithm) to produce outputs that get higher human approval. RLHF is a technique to align an intelligent agent with human preferences by training a reward model from human feedback. In other words, RLHF helps the chef learn what kinds of dishes people actually enjoy.

Finally, few-shot learning means the model can grasp a new task from very few examples. It's like showing the chef just a couple of sample recipes for a new dish and expecting them to generalize. Few-shot learning enables a pre-trained model to generalize to new data categories using only a handful of labeled examples per class. Humans excel at few-shot learning, and modern AI tries to mimic this ability. from human feedback. In other words, RLHF helps the chef learn what kinds of dishes people actually enjoy.

Finally, few-shot learning means the model can grasp a new task from very few examples. It's like showing the chef just a couple of sample recipes for a new dish and expecting them to generalize. Few-shot learning enables a pre-trained model to generalize to new data categories using only a handful of labeled examples per class. Humans excel at few-shot learning, and modern AI tries to mimic this ability.

  • Instruction tuning: Fine-tuning on (instruction → response) pairs so the model follows new formats (teaching presentation/plate style)

  • RLHF: Training with feedback from humans (critics score dishes), aligning the model with human preferences

  • Few-shot learning: Model generalizes to a new task from only a few examples (chef learning a new dish from 3 sample recipes)

Overall, the key insight is that fine-tuning is far more efficient than training a model from scratch. Training enormous models from zero can be tremendously expensive, whereas fine-tuning an existing model requires far less data and only a fraction of the computational demands when using PEFT methods like LoRA. In our analogy, it's much quicker to teach an experienced chef a new specialty cuisine than to train someone who has never cooked. By building on existing knowledge, fine-tuning lets even beginners create powerful AI tools without reinventing the wheel.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Satarupa Deb directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Satarupa Deb
Satarupa Deb