So... Can Embryos Be Treated Like Property in Aussie Courts?

Dan ToombsDan Toombs
6 min read

Right, this one’s a bit of a head-scratcher. Not just legally, but emotionally too.

Because we're not talking about houses or cars or super here. We're talking about embryos — those tiny clumps of cells full of hope, potential, and (let’s be honest) a fair amount of heartbreak.

Now, before the legal brain freeze kicks in, let’s break this down properly. Plain English. No waffle. No legal gobbledygook.

Let’s talk about how Aussie courts deal with embryos when relationships fall apart — and why the whole “are they property?” thing is a way bigger deal than it sounds.


What even is “property” in family law?

Okay, quick detour — in family law, “property” isn’t just land or a boat or your ex’s dodgy crypto wallet.

It’s basically anything that can be owned, controlled, or has value. Superannuation, furniture, frequent flyer points... you’d be surprised what ends up in a settlement.

So the big legal question is: can embryos — frozen and stored at a clinic somewhere — fit into that definition?

Seems straightforward, yeah?

Yeah... nah. It’s messy.


The law's been a bit all over the place on this

There’s no clear legislation in Australia that outright says, “Hey, embryos = property.” Which means we’re relying on court cases, past decisions, and a whole lot of legal debate to figure it out.

Now, in some recent cases — including one that made headlines — the Family Court did allow embryos to be dealt with as part of a property settlement. Not because the Court declared, “Yep, embryos are property,” but more like... for this specific purpose, they’ll treat them like that.

Weird workaround, right?

One judge basically said, “Look, we’re not saying embryos are just like your car or your cash, but we can’t ignore them either — especially if both parties have a stake in them.”

It’s kind of a legal shrug. Like: “We’ll allow it, but we’re not exactly thrilled about it.”


But wait — isn’t this about human life?

Yep. That’s where things get tricky.

See, embryos sit in this grey zone. They’re not legally recognised as full-blown people. But they’re also not just tissue samples or random bits of medical waste.

Emotionally? They're massive. For people going through IVF or preserving fertility, embryos can represent the only shot at having a biological child. That’s huge.

So when a relationship breaks down, and one person wants to use the embryos — and the other one doesn’t — things can get brutal, fast.


One case that rattled everyone

There was a case not too long ago where a couple split, and there were a few embryos left from IVF. The woman wanted to use them. The man said no.

The clinic wouldn't release them unless both agreed. Deadlock.

Eventually, the Court let the embryos be included in the property pool — even though they weren’t “declaring” them as property per se.

It was more of a workaround to sort out who had the legal right to decide what happens next.

It didn’t settle the debate, though. If anything, it made it murkier.


So where does that leave everyone else?

Honestly? Bit in limbo.

Different courts and different judges might take different views, depending on the circumstances.

There’s no uniform rule yet, no “black letter” law saying, “Here’s how we handle embryos after a breakup.” Which is… well, not ideal.

Especially for couples going through IVF who split down the track — and suddenly realise they didn’t plan for this scenario.


Pro tip: sort it out early, before things go pear-shaped

Sounds unromantic, but if you're doing IVF with a partner, make sure your consent forms cover what happens to embryos if the relationship ends.

Many clinics offer forms where you can tick boxes like “destroy,” “donate to science,” “partner decides,” etc. It feels a bit hypothetical when you’re in love and hopeful, but trust me — it’s one of those “better safe than sorry” things.

Because if you don’t? You’re basically handing future-you a legal headache and an emotional rollercoaster.


But here's the kicker — no one agrees on what embryos should be

Some legal experts reckon embryos should be treated as a special category — not quite property, not quite persons, but something in-between.

Others argue they should never be treated as property at all, because of what they represent.

And plenty of people — including judges — are just trying to juggle existing laws in a way that doesn’t feel morally off or emotionally cruel.

This debate? It’s far from settled.


So what does this mean for you?

If you’ve got embryos in storage and things aren’t peachy with your partner (or ex), get advice. Proper advice.

Don’t rely on clinic staff, friends, or even internet forums (tempting, but dangerous). You need someone who actually knows how family law and reproductive law collide — and trust me, they do collide.


The emotional side matters too

Look, this stuff’s not just about law. It’s about people. About future kids. About grief and hope and decisions no one ever expects to make.

So yeah, while the courts may treat embryos like property for some purposes... they’re not a dining table. They’re not a bank account. They carry weight that’s impossible to put a price on.

And that matters.


FAQs

Can I use the embryos if my ex says no? Usually not. Most clinics require both parties to give ongoing consent. If there’s a dispute, the Court might get involved — but it's rare for someone to be forced into parenthood.

Can embryos be divided in a property settlement? They can be dealt with in a settlement, yes — but not necessarily split down the middle like other assets. It depends on the case, the agreements in place, and how the Court approaches it.

Can I stop my ex from using the embryos? If you don’t consent, yes — that typically stops the process, at least in the eyes of most clinics and ethical guidelines.

Are embryos protected under privacy or human rights law? Sort of. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but some protections might apply depending on how the dispute plays out. Definitely something to get legal advice about.

Should I make an agreement before starting IVF? Absolutely. Don’t wait. Even if it feels awkward, setting expectations early can avoid massive drama later.


Final thought — this stuff’s still evolving

The law’s still catching up. Medical technology moves fast. Relationships shift. Emotions run high.

And the courts? They’re trying to make it work in a system that wasn’t really built for these kinds of questions.

If you're in the thick of this — or even on the edge of it — best to chat with someone who deals in both family law and fertility law.

And yep, Page Provan is exactly the kind of firm with lawyers who understand both sides of that fence.


Disclaimer: This article is general information only and not legal advice. Always seek guidance from a qualified family or fertility lawyer for your specific situation.

0
Subscribe to my newsletter

Read articles from Dan Toombs directly inside your inbox. Subscribe to the newsletter, and don't miss out.

Written by

Dan Toombs
Dan Toombs

As the Director and Founder of Practice Proof, Dan Toombs leads a multidisciplinary team delivering full-stack marketing solutions tailored to professional service firms. He has spearheaded hundreds of campaigns across Google Ads, social media, SEO, content marketing, and CRM automation. Under his leadership, Practice Proof has become a StoryBrand-certified agency known for its clarity-driven messaging and measurable results. Dan has also been at the forefront of integrating AI tools, such as intelligent chatbots and automated lead funnels, helping law firms, financial advisors, and healthcare providers modernize client acquisition and retention strategies. His work consistently bridges traditional marketing foundations with cutting-edge digital innovation.