🎟️ Tickets vs 🪙 Tokens – What Changed in Modern Identity Protocols?

“If tickets still work, why is everyone obsessed with tokens?”
That was my honest question — as someone working on enterprise applications like 3DEXPERIENCE, where legacy systems like CAS still thrive.

This post is my reflection and breakdown of what changed from ticket-based authentication (like CAS) to token-based systems (like OAuth2/JWT), and why it matters — only where it actually matters.

🏁 Legacy Era: Ticket-Based Authentication

Systems like CAS (Central Authentication Service) were designed when:

• Applications were monolithic

• Users accessed systems via browser

• Authentication and session handling happened mostly server-side

🔑 How It Works:

1. User logs in to CAS server.

2. CAS issues a login ticket, which is exchanged for a service ticket.

3. The ticket is passed to the application, which then validates it with CAS.

4. On success, the application creates its own session (e.g., cookies) and continues.

   ✅ Good for browser-based SSO
   ❌ Not great for APIs, mobile apps, or distributed microservices

   🚀 Modern Shift: Token-Based Authentication

   As applications became distributed, stateless, and API-heavy, ticket validation patterns didn’t scale well.

   Enter OAuth 2.0 / OIDC with JWT (JSON Web Tokens).

   🪙 How It Works:

   1. 1. User (or app) authenticates via an Identity Provider (IdP).

         2. IdP issues a signed token — often a JWT.

         3. The application (or API gateway) verifies the token locally using a public key, with no call back to IdP.

         4. Token carries identity + claims. No session server required.

✅ Ideal for APIs, SPAs, mobile, microservices
✅ Decoupled, scalable, stateless
❌ Requires trust setup and secure key rotation

---

⚔️ Tickets vs Tokens – Key Differences

---

🧠 So Why Not Replace Tickets Everywhere?

Because tickets still work really well in specific contexts:

• Web-based apps with session handling

• Internal apps with single identity source

• Systems like 3DEXPERIENCE that maintain legacy user context layers

And tokens aren’t magic either:

• JWT misuse can expose identity data

• Local validation can fail if keys aren’t rotated securely

• Stateless systems still need consistent authorization logic

---

🧩 Can They Coexist?

Absolutely. In real-world enterprise systems:

• Frontend may use CAS + ticket-based flow

• API Gateway (e.g., Apigee) may enforce JWT validation

• Backend apps may still use session context or even DB-auth logic

This hybrid is messy, but practical.

---

🧭 When Should You Use What?

---

🪪 Analogy – Passport vs Boarding Pass

• A CAS ticket is like getting your passport stamped at a specific gate. You need to ask the gatekeeper each time.

• A JWT token is like a boarding pass — once issued and verified, you can walk through multiple gates (as long as it’s valid and signed).

---

🧠 Final Thoughts

Modernization is not about replacing CAS with tokens blindly.
It’s about knowing where your app lives, how it communicates, and what trust model you need.

If you're in a legacy + modern mix (like I am with 3DEXPERIENCE), then the real skill is knowing when to use what.